File: Adobe_Animate.swf-(3 KB, 550x400, Loop)
[_] Anon 3278523
>> [_] Anon 3278538 it's not a secret, they officially rebranded Adobe Flash Professional to Adobe Animate
>> [_] Anon 3278543 >># i don't know what they did but my tablet never worked with flash. when they rebranded it to adobe animate it magicly started working again.

File: Adobe_Animate.swf-(3 KB, 550x400, Loop)
[_] adobe animate = cash grab? Anon 3174331 Marked for deletion (old).
>> [_] Anon 3174333 >># why do you think so OP?
>> [_] Anon 3174336 >># forget your tinfoil hat? >># >check'd Animate just adds HTM5 ntive and yes, fixes up the mess of a UI
>> [_] Anon 3174338 Basically some shitty companies like Crapple dislike Flash so I guess they are rebranding. Adobe HQ is round the corner from me, I could go ask them.
>> [_] Anon 3174361 >># huh? it *is* flash pro. they just rebranded it because flash as gotten a bad reputation (thanks fucking google and apple) and most youtubers dont export to swf any more
>> [_] Anon 3174374 from what you see on zone's twitter, it's still very shitty and doesn't fix a lot of glitches, even brings some of its very own.... it's really just the cremated ashes of adobe flash
>> [_] Anon 3174392 >># zone has a twitter? and he's trash talking flash???
>> [_] Anon 3174394 >># >most youtubers dont export to swf This has always made me sad. I mean I guess it makes sense because you'd see their animation without them getting any money if you rewatched the swf.
>> [_] Anon 3174420 >># >zone-sama >he da fuq is wrong with you BOI?!
>> [_] Anon 3174450 >># let's be honest, you wouldn't miss out much money. 99.99% of the views would still be on youtube. always hated google for not allowing swf uploads. >before anybody even says it: you can easily strip away any harmful actionscript from a swf file during upload. it would be child's play for google. >># im not doing that meme anymore, zone has betrayed /f/. he no longer posts fun things here and he doesnt care to make his flashes below the file size limit any longer.
>> [_] Anon 3174464 >># It really would allow for more efficient uploading of certain video content. I mean sure that won't happen too often and a different, newer, vector only format could probably allow for even greater returns in terms of space reduction but that's still something.
>> [_] Anon 3174473 >># i didn't really mean they should add it today, they should have added it 2010. instead they didn't and pretty much killed swf animations since you had to release on youtube to get the money and then why bother also releasing the swf that you used to make that animation? in those days flash was required to watch videos on youtube so it wasn't even reasonable from a anti-plugin perspective
>> [_] Anon 3174494 >># Maybe someday someone will step up with swftube, preferably under a catchier name.
>> [_] Anon 3174503 SWFs aren't shared because they'd directly harm originality. You can rip a SWF, it's hard to rip anything from a composited video. You can't separate and extract assets at all. Plus streaming content is much better suited to video, not SWF. If a SWF contains code, jumping to the middle could totally screw up the timeline. etc etc. Do your research on the individual formats to understand why this is a terrible idea.
>> [_] Anon 3174512 >># >Do your research on the individual formats to understand why this is a terrible idea. was going to give you a very intelligent answer that breaks down exactly why you are full of shit but since you ended with the typical internet argument insult i will give you the same. fuck you, you don't even know how much i know about every single god damn format out there. flash is awesome and there is NO reason why it would be a "terrible idea" to use it for animations