STORY LOOP FURRY PORN GAMES C SERVICES [?] [R] RND POPULAR | Archived flashes: 228074 |
/disc/ · /res/ — /show/ · /fap/ · /gg/ · /swf/ | P0001 · P2560 · P5120 |
This is resource SBYFIO5, an Archived Thread.
Original location: http://boards.4chan.org/f/thread/3385729/r-inside Recognized format: Yes, thread post count is 6. Discovered flash files: 1 File: starscream.swf-(810 KB, 600x400, Anime) [_] /r/ inside Anonymous 03/28/19(Thu)22:38:53 No.3385729 looking for one or more flashes I *know* used [600billionlazer - Super Shelter 64] https://onbp.bandcamp.com/track/600billionlazer-super-shelter-64-unreleased-guest-bonus-track as the audio; searching that in swfchan and 4plebs reveals a big honking nothingburger. Offering a 200+ upload classic for general principle. Thanks in advance if anyone has a superior memory. >> [_] Anonymous 03/28/19(Thu)23:56:47 No.3385736 >>3385729 you mean exact same audio? because space_shelter.swf uses the original song >> [_] Anonymous 03/29/19(Fri)12:09:08 No.3385770 >>3385729 >swfchan and 4plebs reveals a big honking nothingburger 4plebs aweful searching interface aside, you know that there's a difference between searching for filenames and for keywords in threads on swfchan, right? because looking for a filename is probably only the 1st step and obiously doesn't feature sauce >> [_] Anonymous 03/29/19(Fri)19:27:22 No.3385799 >>3385736 BINGO Thanks, based anon, that's what I was thinking of. >>3385770 Yeah, without a filename, it's down to trying keywords. Wish there was a more "lazy" search, had I only separated "shelter" from the sauce name, I would have hit it... but ONLY if I tried it in the filename slot with wildcard and not in keyword. This is why humans can't be replaced; thanks for your input anons. >> [_] Anonymous 03/29/19(Fri)20:18:14 No.3385803 >>3385799 in this case the human COULD have been replaced, had the search been a better robot. robots will continue to get better. it's just still too early to replace everyone. Instead the update will be released in waves as sectors become replaceable. Lorry Drivers are the next big one. >> [_] Anonymous 03/29/19(Fri)20:37:09 No.3385809 >>3385803 Automation is inevitable, and true, the bots could be better. But I don't for a minute think that humans are 100% replaceable for the simple fact that without humans, automation has no intrinsic purpose. I think automation may aid, but won't replace occupations like lorry drivers; even less so, management positions. Boston Dynamics just released a new video of the new Handle 'bot, it seems a likely replacement for SKU-stuffing Amazon slaves, but there still needs to be human management to make any sense of anything. SKYNET has a way to go yet before we're exterminated. |
|