File: It's not ogre, until I say it's ogre.swf-(9.07 MB, 480x360, Other)
[_] Anonymous 11/09/20(Mon)23:19:27 No.3445219
Happy 9/11, burgers.
Marked for deletion (old).
>> [_] Anonymous 11/09/20(Mon)23:22:24 No.3445220
>>3445219
Are you dyslexic?
>> [_] Anonymous 11/10/20(Tue)02:25:58 No.3445224
>>3445220
It makes sense to put the numbers in order. day/month/year makes more sense than month/day/year
>> [_] Anonymous 11/10/20(Tue)02:35:03 No.3445225
>>3445219
>>3445224
thus it happened on 11/9
>> [_] Anonymous 11/10/20(Tue)02:45:27 No.3445226
>>3445224
>not the superior year/month/day
shiggy diggy desu
>> [_] Anonymous 11/10/20(Tue)02:59:23 No.3445227
>>3445226
I'm more ok with this than I am with moth/day/year
>> [_] Anonymous 11/10/20(Tue)03:34:19 No.3445228
>>3445219
what the fuck is still this place and why I feel like shit for only starting to browse when is
about to be dead, this place really feels like the old internet
>> [_] Anonymous 11/10/20(Tue)03:38:55 No.3445229
>>3445224
Only if you're fixated on ascending/descending order. Even then you could argue that numerically
it is in ascending order even though in terms of time period it isn't. Otherwise it simply
matches the speech order people use when describing a date. At least for the anglosphere that is,
not sure how other people refer to dates.
>> [_] Anonymous 11/10/20(Tue)09:19:36 No.3445245
>>3445229
https://i.imgur.com/MQ7LVC3.jpg
>> [_] Anonymous 11/10/20(Tue)09:29:16 No.3445246
>>3445219
Wait. Isnt it 10/11 today?
>> [_] Anonymous 11/10/20(Tue)09:30:18 No.3445247
>>3445219
>de_vertigo
>> [_] Anonymous 11/10/20(Tue)12:08:15 No.3445260
>>3445226
Nigga, do you even ISO 8601?
It's year-month-day (2001-09-11).
>> [_] Anonymous 11/10/20(Tue)15:17:33 No.3445277
>>3445228
Oh god, welcome new/f/riend.
You're a little late to the party but please, stay a while.
>> [_] Anonymous 11/10/20(Tue)15:38:21 No.3445280
>>3445224
You say
>April 20th, 1891
(4/20/1891)
not
>20 April, 1891
(20/4/1891)
>> [_] Anonymous 11/10/20(Tue)16:22:45 No.3445282
>>3445224
No it doesn't. If I make a bunch of files and organize them by timestamps, it'll stay ordered as
long as I separate them per year using month/day/year.
>> [_] Anonymous 11/10/20(Tue)17:02:01 No.3445288
>>3445280
you could just as easily say its the 20th of April.
>> [_] Anonymous 11/10/20(Tue)17:08:27 No.3445289
>>3445288
Sure, you could. But it's less brief, so no one does. Month/Day/Year has all the organizational
benefits while also lining up with how people think of dates. Unlike some other aspects of the
metric system, there's no reason to obsess over it's order or proportion to one another other
than to satisfy your autism.
>> [_] Anonymous 11/10/20(Tue)19:21:39 No.3445297
>>3445228
Do Not Disturb The Guardians
>> [_] Anonymous 11/10/20(Tue)19:30:14 No.3445298
>>3445280
>>3445289
>t: EOP
People outside the anglosphere do in fact say stuff like 20th april 1891.
>> [_] Anonymous 11/10/20(Tue)19:46:06 No.3445300
>>3445298
>>3445282
The only other order that does this is descending. The only thing worse than day/month/year is
something that has year in the middle.
