File: A_Kings_Fall.swf-(6.99 MB, 472x1574, Loop)
[_] Final Dump - 5 Question Inside Anonymous 07/28/21(Wed)15:15:05 No.3469461
Anyone know how to make the flash player debugger show *only* the stage?
Like, this flash will work correctly online i.e show only the stage without the text from off
stage. (i hope so)
But when I download it and use the flash player debugger, its gonna show the text as well. I
spent over 1-2 hours on this shit looking into actionscripts and stuff to maybe set a 'default'
dimension size of the 'flash player debugger' but nothing worked.
----
Anyway, fuck rachel, see you all fags after 2-3 days when these threads die out.
If you recommend any simple loops to be made, post the image and the music that might fit it, and
I'll try and make em.
Marked for deletion (old).
>> [_] Anonymous 07/28/21(Wed)15:30:47 No.3469464
>>3469461
just push the text further to the sides
in the meantime you could learn how to make seamless audio loops
>> [_] Anonymous 07/28/21(Wed)15:51:12 No.3469466
>>3469464
but i don wanna do that
is there no way to set the dimensions of the player opening the swf?
>> [_] Anonymous 07/28/21(Wed)15:55:21 No.3469467
>>3469461
When I open your loops with the flash projector, the window is only showing the stage. It could
be a mac problem.
>> [_] Anonymous 07/28/21(Wed)16:39:40 No.3469469
>>3469467
yeah.. could be
still sucks though
>> [_] Anonymous 07/28/21(Wed)16:42:59 No.3469470
>>3469466
the flash projector only shows the stage, unless you maximize the window
>> [_] Anonymous 07/28/21(Wed)16:48:59 No.3469472
>>3469470
mine seems to doesn't like that this is a long vertical flash and widens up a little for some
reason
i'm using the flash player debugger for mac, maybe thats the issue idk tho
>> [_] Anonymous 07/30/21(Fri)12:08:18 No.3469538
>>3469461
You don't seem to understand how the projection works at all.
Flash only intends to show the stage.
It will scale it up, so that the aspect ration is kept, but the width touches the side of the
screen, or the height, whatever's bigger.
So what gets displayed depends on the screen of the viewer and the aspect ration of their window
if it's not fullscreened.
The art of creating sauce under the flash (you should never use the side of the stage anyway) is
to know how far away is enough.
If you want to have more control over the stage you can set the stage at a bigger resolution than
your content, as a black box and use actionscript to not scale the stage (something like
stage.noscale ?), though that makes the viewer unable to change the stage in any way, possibly
preventing him from seeing the entire stage.
>> [_] Anonymous 07/30/21(Fri)13:38:25 No.3469551
>>3469538
>So what gets displayed depends on the screen of the viewer and the aspect ration of their window
if it's not fullscreened.
well that fucking sucks, whats the point of telling animate what the stage is if its just gonna
show the sides as well.
>is to know how far away is enough.
yeah i get that, but i wanted the text to simply stick to the sides with no black bars in between
the text and the stage.
>you can set the stage at a bigger resolution than your content, as a black box and use
actionscript to not scale the stage (something like stage.noscale ?)
I don't think this will work. If the resolution of the stage is higher, the projecter is
*definitely* gonna show the area *without* the content as well.
The problem is that its showing stuff from the *offstage*.
I tried using stage.noscale (and different variants) and got some variations of the result but
nothing what I wanted.
(stage.noscale worked, but it just stretched out the content to the *same dimension* when I could
see the side texts as well)
I really think there should be more control over the projector dimensions via actionscript. Maybe
there is? but i couldn't find it.
>> [_] Anonymous 07/30/21(Fri)13:43:43 No.3469552
>>3469551
but i'll try fiddling around with the resolution thing, to see if anything works
at the very least, it seems to work fine online, its just the issue with the flash player
debugger. but it would just suck, if someone downloads it and plainly see the text from offstage
>> [_] Anonymous 07/30/21(Fri)13:57:34 No.3469555
>>3469551
>>3469552
The base of your problem is the following:
Your image is fucking hugely high. It has a smartphone-esque resolution, not a widescreen-esque
one.
What exactly do you think is the acceptable outcome? Having it zoomed in, so there is a scroll
window? I don't think flash works like that, but I suppose you COULD just script something like
this in actionscript.
I have seen whole pdfs converted to flash, so I know it can be done.
But really, just use a cropped image that at least is wider than not.
There is a reason the sides are shown. They are offstage filler. There isn't supposed to be
anything there. Flash was always built around the fact to be embedded on a html page anyway, this
way you could just do what you want with it.
The stage is meant to be displayed all at once.
And obviously I cannot just crop of the sides of my screen.
I think it's fine as is, just let the thought of using the horiozontal sides go.
It was a meme that went too far it seems.
What to you want to accomplish anyway? Somebody would have to change his window accordingly to
see anything there. It's really bothersome for simple eastereggs.
A box below the flash is the gold standard for a reason.
>I tried using stage.noscale (and different variants) and got some variations of the result but
nothing what I wanted.
Same problem, you'd need your image to partly be below the stage, so it maintains that wider than
high aspect ratio, but obviously it would be hard to see the bottom part of it.
A scroll function like seen in bed.swf would do maybe.
>> [_] Anonymous 07/30/21(Fri)14:08:51 No.3469557
I was going to answer, then >>3469555 did it before me. See, stage is too tall. I changed height
to 1000 (from 1574) with a decompiler. Bam!, no text on the sides. Sadly I can't realy center the
image then, unless I do it manually for all the frames, so I'm not posting the result here.
>> [_] Anonymous 07/30/21(Fri)14:26:55 No.3469560
>>3469555
>What exactly do you think is the acceptable outcome? Having it zoomed in, so there is a scroll
window?
Well, all I have to do is resize the flash projector horizontally, until the text is not visible,
and it works as I intended.
I don't want a scroll window.
>just use a cropped image that at least is wider than not.
yeah i'll definitely keep that in mind in the future. the embed works fine online, it just sucks
that the projecter doesn't work as intended.
>just let the thought of using the horiozontal sides go.
yeah probably
>Somebody would have to change his window accordingly to see anything there. It's really
bothersome for simple eastereggs.
ehh.. its fine. the main content is the gif and the music really.
the way I think of creating simple flash loops, is that you open em, you see the image & music,
it feels good, it evokes some emotion/feeling in you, maybe reminds you of some scene/moment. And
you close it.
I'd rather not have filler offstage text onto the main content if it can be avoided.
>>3469557
>stage is too tall. I changed height to 1000 (from 1574) with a decompiler. Bam!, no text on the
sides. Sadly I can't realy center the image then, unless I do it manually for all the frames, so
I'm not posting the result here.
I'll check it out, thanks!
Yeah the image & stage is too tall, I'll keep it in mind in the future.
At the very least, it works fine online :)
>> [_] Anonymous 07/30/21(Fri)14:33:46 No.3469561
Thank you /f/rens! You've been very helpful! <3
