File: topweeb.swf-(7.85 MB, 80x46, Other)
[_] Anonymous 04/13/24(Sat)06:36:51 No.3506638
Marked for deletion (old).
>> [_] Anonymous 04/13/24(Sat)08:12:54 No.3506639
I'm cracking up
Why the FUCK is this nearly 8MB?
>> [_] Anonymous 04/13/24(Sat)12:14:11 No.3506640
le Shrek song LELE
>>3506639
Possibly due to the state of such flash being sourced from a video, as opposed to a far more
efficient loop consisting of a select few animations.
>> [_] Anonymous 04/13/24(Sat)18:06:52 No.3506653
>>3506640
Yea, for a decent sized video maybe. This was purposefully made insanely small. I can only assume
OP is making a jest and it did, in fact, make me guffaw.
>> [_] Anonymous 04/14/24(Sun)19:00:14 No.3506677
Let me guess.
OP just converted the video instead of creating an actual loop.
Well, at least he didn't tag it [L] because this certainly isn't.
>> [_] Anonymous 04/16/24(Tue)04:45:39 No.3506714
>>3506653
Either the audio is encoded to be low quality and stored lossless anyway, or the video has a lot
of bitrate. Since the pixels seem pretty sharp it probably has a decent overshoot in bitrate.
