File[Draw_With_Me_finished.swf] - (7.49 MB)
[_] [A] Brace for tears. Anonymous 03/13/10(Sat)17:29 No.1208994
inb4 "furfaggotry"
inb4 "use a ladder"
Marked for deletion (old).
>> [_] Anonymous 03/13/10(Sat)18:03 No.1209019
Many a good conversation about this flash /f/ has had. I believe it is among the top 10 deepest
of /f/. And even though it at face value is furry, no one truly believes this flash is shit and
should burn.
>> [_] Anonymous 03/13/10(Sat)18:08 No.1209024
>top 10 deepest of /f/
Mind you, /f/ can hardly be considered deep.
>> [_] Anonymous 03/13/10(Sat)18:08 No.1209025
There She Is > Draw With Me
Just saying
>> [_] Anonymous 03/13/10(Sat)18:37 No.1209048
I'm SO TIRED OF THIS SHIT GETTING PRAISED FOR BEING DEEP. THE ONLY GOOD PART OF THIS FLASH IS
THAT LAST SPLIT SECOND, GODDAMNIT.
>> [_] ÂÂ 03/13/10(Sat)18:40 No.1209050
>>1209025
there she is ftw
>> [_] Anonymous 03/13/10(Sat)18:44 No.1209053
getting a serious Van Gogh vibe... and not the artistic, brilliant kind of vibe... the batshit
crazy 'chops off their own limbs' kind of vibe
>> [_] Anonymous 03/13/10(Sat)18:50 No.1209062
>>1209019
I beg to differ. This whole thing was so cliche, and while on a whole it was not bad, the story
was absolute shit. The idea of an impenetrable, reassembling glass wall is pretty clever, and it
is wasted in something as stupid as this.
The whole thing is just filled with so many shit, cliche phrases. Like in those movies where it's
like "MAMA HOLD ME" and "I MISS YOU SO MUCH" and everyone's like "oh god, fuck you director." One
that particularly annoyed me was "It feels cold."
>> [_] Anonymous 03/13/10(Sat)19:17 No.1209093
Tears?
More like "This is idiotic" generic rage.
If he can toss something OVER it, and there are things like damnedable casts, I figure you could
make a rope, or shit...
Why are people so stupid.
That wasn't sweet, it was a sign to how retarded people are when faced with something they don't
understand.
>> [_] Anonymous 03/13/10(Sat)19:23 No.1209098
>>1209093
Nothing living can pass over the wall. He tried using a ladder to go over in some expanded
material, but ended up losing an ear. Rope would likely have the same result.
>> [_] Anonymous 03/13/10(Sat)19:26 No.1209102
>>1209098
Submarine, have a giant man throw it very hard.
Stupid idea for a barrier, meet stupid solution.
>> [_] Anonymous 03/13/10(Sat)19:28 No.1209104
>>1209102
The solution in that case is stupider than the barrier.
It's a cartoon for Christ's sake, can't you just take it for what it is?
>> [_] Anonymous 03/13/10(Sat)19:30 No.1209110
>>1209098
when the fuck did that happen?
>> [_] Anonymous 03/13/10(Sat)19:33 No.1209113
>>1209104
No... The idea really isn't... If nothing living can pass and it can be struck, you just have to
move through it fast enough to avoid consequence.
Given that his hand was through the glass and that was about it, we can assume that the time is
in fractions of a second. So, we send an object fast enough, problem solved.
Making a barrier for living things is a horrible idea.
Not explaining it clearly makes it challenging to beat simply because the creator can say
"doesn't work, cause lol."
This is a mistake people make with animations. Kids, this is not an impassable barrier.
As another note, I'd laugh my ass off if she eventually brings a boyfriend to the wall to say her
final goodbyes and he is eternally lonely.
>> [_] Anonymous 03/13/10(Sat)19:35 No.1209116
>>1209110
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rb_ZU1lCgnc#t=3m46s
>> [_] Comment Dikoleo 03/13/10(Sat)19:37 No.1209118
Nice
>> [_] Anonymous 03/13/10(Sat)19:38 No.1209120
>>1209113
It is an impassible barrier, because that's what the creator intended it to be.
You are being an ass. Stop trying to apply literal thinking to a metaphorical cartoon.
>> [_] Anonymous 03/13/10(Sat)19:39 No.1209124
>>1209120
What's the metaphor?
Don't do things like "try?"
Yeah, as long as it remains an antimotivational cartoon, I will place myself on the side of "It's
stupid."
>> [_] Anonymous 03/13/10(Sat)19:43 No.1209128
>>1209120
he's not being an ass, the creator is just uncreative
>> [_] Anonymous 03/13/10(Sat)19:45 No.1209131
>>1209124
>Ask what the metaphor is
>Describe a moral
You failed english class, didn't you?
A metaphor is not a message, a metaphor is a symbolic representation of something else. In this
case, the cartoon is representing two artists with a long distance relationship, or at least I
believe that's what the creator stated.
>> [_] Anonymous 03/13/10(Sat)19:48 No.1209133
>>1209128
No, >>1209113 is being an ass.
The questions he's asking are like asking why Daffy Duck can reattach his bill after it's been
blown off, or how it can still talk when disconnected. It just works like that.
>> [_] Anonymous 03/13/10(Sat)19:49 No.1209135
>>1209131
I concede that I had a mix of words there.
I retain it being stupid.
>> [_] Anonymous 03/13/10(Sat)19:51 No.1209139
>>1209135
Well that's like, your opinion man.
Stop trying to treat it as fact.
>> [_] Anonymous 03/13/10(Sat)19:53 No.1209141
OP here. I completely saw this coming.
Every fucking time this flash is posted, the thread erupts in trolling and fiery arguments
between those who like it and those who don't.
>> [_] Anonymous 03/13/10(Sat)19:56 No.1209143
>>1209133
Daffy Duck is obviously meant to be silly.
The story here retains that IT'S A SERIOUS MATTER.
Any person who put serious thought into it would realize there are solutions that don't just
include going over or punching it. If you can break it with a bare hand, you could break it with
the impact of a much larger object.
If they have modern medicine, I'd assume modern transportation. A car, for one. If it yields to a
few exchanged punches, a car going 80mph in an abyss would easily do the same.
We don't know their ages, but we can assume that they are children, sure.
Hell, you could probably manage a bike if you really got going. I've been hit with a bike, it's a
hell of a lot worse than a punch. Larger hole, longer to fix, easier to pass through, really.
Either explain how that's impossible through the animation itself or don't portray it as the end
of the world.
>> [_] Anonymous 03/13/10(Sat)19:57 No.1209146
>>1209141
Not OP here.
:3c
>> [_] Anonymous 03/13/10(Sat)19:59 No.1209148
>>1209143
When the wall reassembles itself, it pulls back and shreds anything that passes through, you see
this in the way the arm moves as it is whipped back forcefully. Yeah, you could drive a car
through it if you wanted to die a particularly painful death. Fuck load of good that would do you.
>> [_] Anonymous 03/13/10(Sat)20:01 No.1209151
>>1209143
The creator chose to have an impassable barrier here, so it is impassible. If the creator says it
is, it is. That's all there is to it and no bullshit run around arguments by a third party will
change that.
>> [_] Anonymous 03/13/10(Sat)20:01 No.1209152
>>1209148
>Glass is going to shred metal
Yep, I'll have a horrible time going through that.
>> [_] Anonymous 03/13/10(Sat)20:03 No.1209155
>>1209151
Bullshit run around for a bullshit barrier.
>> [_] Anonymous 03/13/10(Sat)20:05 No.1209158
>>1209152
It's already established that the wall is supernatural, you argument is invalid.
Any thing moving at a high enough speed can punch through anything else. It could be assumed that
the repairing of the glass wall has a rubber band like effect, the further the pieces are
scattered the more force and speed they have coming back in. If they can tear up/sever a hand/arm
with only a foot or two of distance, they'd do a shit ton more damage if scattered by a higher
impact.
>> [_] Anonymous 03/13/10(Sat)20:09 No.1209161
>>1209155
Call it bullshit all you want, but it's the truth.
If an author is writing a book and says a duck walks up to the main character, it is a duck. It
is not a goose, pheasant or any other kind for bird unless otherwise stated at a latter point.
Same thing applies here.
>> [_] Anonymous 03/13/10(Sat)20:09 No.1209162
Why the hell doesn't he just go around the corner...
>> [_] Anonymous 03/13/10(Sat)20:10 No.1209164
Cmon guys, artists do this all the time. Place something with humanlike behaviors in a universe
that has been specifically designed to expose a particular aspect of human nature. This type of
staging is nothing new.
>> [_] Anonymous 03/13/10(Sat)20:10 No.1209165
>>1209158
Where is that explained?
That point is invalid simply because it is not explained as such.
Even in that situation, there are ways out.
You have a given amount of time, open the driver side door, tuck and roll.
The glass is breakable, that is all that's needed to get through.
Even if the vehicle is destroyed, mission accomplished.
The wall is not infallible.
>> [_] Anonymous 03/13/10(Sat)20:10 No.1209166
why can't he ram through the barrier? honestly guys?
I think the bigger question is, "why do people actually like this abomination of a story?"
>> [_] Anonymous 03/13/10(Sat)20:11 No.1209168
>>1209162
Wall goes off endlessly in either direction.
>> [_] Anonymous 03/13/10(Sat)20:12 No.1209169
>>1209166
/brofist
>> [_] Anonymous 03/13/10(Sat)20:14 No.1209170
>>1209165
Okay, if the wall isn't supernatural then how does it reassemble itself and prevent people from
going over the top?
>> [_] Anonymous 03/13/10(Sat)20:14 No.1209172
>>1209165
Okay, if the wall isn't supernatural then how does it reassemble itself and prevent people from
going over the top?
Also, jumping out of the vehicle would not work. You still passed through the barrier, so you
will still be sucked back to the other side. If anything it would make you more vulnerable to the
wall.
>> [_] Anonymous 03/13/10(Sat)20:14 No.1209174
>>1209170
I meant the point that the speed is not defined as anything other than constant.
Also, it could totally be The Matrix.
>> [_] Anonymous 03/13/10(Sat)20:15 No.1209175
>>1209172
He wasn't sucked out, his hand was sliced off.
It was NEVER stated that he was pulled back, never even depicted.
>> [_] Anonymous 03/13/10(Sat)20:15 No.1209176
>>1209166
It's sweet.
>> [_] Anonymous 03/13/10(Sat)20:21 No.1209181
>>1209175
It was too depicted. First off, it never showed the hand being sliced, dropping or falling away.
What you do see is his hand, after breaking through the glass, get pulled back and shredded to
hell. It's pulled back hard enough to whip clear around behind him.
>> [_] Anonymous 03/13/10(Sat)20:28 No.1209183
>>1209181
If he were pulled back, his hand likely wouldn't have been shredded. He pulled his hand back in
seeing that the glass was coming back. The speed at which his pulled back increased as his hand
was torn to shit. That would explain the turnaround.
Why would something push when it has a built in "shred you to shit" mechanism?
Silly, silly, silly.
>> [_] Anonymous 03/13/10(Sat)20:31 No.1209186
>>1209183
Your post makes no sense.
The hand would be shredded either way, since the glass would be rushing in around it at the same
time as it was being pulled back through.
All of these arguments are pointless though because of >>1209151
>>1209161
>> [_] Anonymous 03/13/10(Sat)20:35 No.1209187
>>1209186
Author didn't think it through.
If it made sense, I wouldn't question it.
If it pushed back, he'd realize the glass was coming and have much more time to avoid it.
Obviously, he pulled back.
>> [_] Anonymous 03/13/10(Sat)20:40 No.1209191
>>1209187
It's animation, it doesn't need to make sense!
>> [_] Anonymous 03/13/10(Sat)20:45 No.1209198
>>1209191
Okay, let me rephrase that.
It needs to be consistent.
>> [_] Anonymous 03/13/10(Sat)20:46 No.1209199
>>1209198
How is it inconsistent?
>> [_] Anonymous 03/13/10(Sat)21:05 No.1209200
how do I down load this ?! >.>
I want to treasure it forever
>> [_] Anonymous 03/13/10(Sat)21:08 No.1209202
>>1209200
file > save as
What I'm really wondering is: What animal is the boy? He seems to have rabbit ears and a dog's
tail.
>> [_] Anonymous 03/13/10(Sat)21:09 No.1209203
What absolute twaddle. A that height, could have made a rope out of their clothes.
>> [_] Anonymous 03/13/10(Sat)21:10 No.1209204
thank you >.<
>> [_] Anonymous 03/13/10(Sat)21:18 No.1209209
>>1209203
see
>>1209098
>> [_] Anonymous 03/13/10(Sat)22:03 No.1209244
wow, when did everyone on /f/ get so stupid?...
..
oh yeah..
>> [_] Anonymous 03/13/10(Sat)22:05 No.1209246
>>1209244
Welcome to 4chan. It's a lot like Wonderland, but instead of everybody being mad, everybody's a
bit retarded. even you, otherwise you wouldn't be here.
>> [_] Anonymous 03/13/10(Sat)23:04 No.1209282
Before TL;DR, Barrier made by creator is impassible without consequence and then you go back to
your origin. This entire animation is all for the simple metaphor of a barrier that you can't get
rid of.
Let's look at the Creator of this. He made this flash for his girlfriend who lived a very long
distance away from him. The wall is a symbol of the impassible distance. The breaking and
shredding of the arm are symbols of a passage across the distance at the cost of a large sum of
money and even then, he is tied to his current position by some unseen power. The fact that he
can send the chalk over the wall is that the "over the wall" movement is a communication through
the internet or some other device. The cutting off of her own arm is a symbol I don't quite
understand at this point.
>> [_] Anonymous 03/13/10(Sat)23:28 No.1209286
>>1209282
The arm thing is probably just a representation of some sort of sacrifice she made for the
relationship, or a symbol of the love they share.
>> [_] Anonymous 03/14/10(Sun)00:04 No.1209291
>>1209282
>>1209286
..That just makes it even more deliciously twisted when he drew a followup image where the guy
wrote back "I don't want your arm. I want you." and turned away
>> [_] Anonymous 03/14/10(Sun)00:12 No.1209294
>>1209282
So basically it's "WHY CAN'T I BE WITH MY INTERNET G/F!?" It's a nice sentiment, but really, it's
the creator's own fault for getting involved in such a relationship if he was unable to deal with
the distance.
>> [_] Anonymous 03/14/10(Sun)00:14 No.1209300
>>1209294
No. The "Internet girlfriend" thing is not what I'm going for. His girlfriend is actually someone
he knew in real life through high-school. I believe they were across oceanic borders from each
other. It is not a person he just found and fell in love with online.
>> [_] Anonymous 03/14/10(Sun)00:18 No.1209306
>>1209300
This. it was also originally intended to be released on Valentines as a "present" for his gf.
>> [_] Anonymous 03/14/10(Sun)01:35 No.1209354
IN A WORLD WITHOUT LADDERS
ONE MAN
ONE WOMAN
ONE WALL
THREE HANDS.
