File[Bloomin' Octagon.swf] - (7.21 MB)
[_] [L] Better version of >1387752 Anonymous 10/03/10(Sun)08:22 No.

  Seriously, what's with all this l4ppyloops crap?

>> [_] Anonymous 10/03/10(Sun)08:24 No.

  knowing as l4ppyloops are the guys who originally turned this into a flash loop, i'd say theres
  nothing wrong with it

>> [_] Anonymous 10/03/10(Sun)08:39 No.

  >>1387814
  You're wrong, and an idiot.

>> [_] Anonymous 10/03/10(Sun)08:42 No.

  >>1387824
  really? prove me wrong then

>> [_] Anonymous 10/03/10(Sun)08:50 No.

  >>1387825

  Whois on l4ppyloops.info:

  Domain ID:D32157116-LRMS
  Domain Name:L4PPYLOOPS.INFO
  Created On:05-Apr-2010 23:43:19 UTC

  Youtube video of the (what I believe to be) original octagon remix:
  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wu22qFCin9U
  >March 23rd 2010

  Link to the looped flash on swfchan:
  http://swfchan.com/17/82756/?octagon.swf
  Times it has been spotted: 34
  First seen: 31/3 -2010 06:12:47
  Last seen: 3/10 -2010 15:28:27

  I think you'll find cr4ppyloops didn't even exist at the time the remix, and then the flash loop,
  was created.

  Go suck a dick.

>> [_] Anonymous 10/03/10(Sun)08:56 No.

  The domain didn't exist, but the loop however, did. It started on a subdomain and was moved to a
  fully qualified later

>> [_] Anonymous 10/03/10(Sun)09:04 No.

  >>1387831
  really? prove it

>> [_] Anonymous 10/03/10(Sun)09:07 No.

  >>1387838
  i remember creating the site, i should know

>> [_] Anonymous 10/03/10(Sun)09:10 No.

  >>1387840
  that's funny you should say that, because i remember creating this loop

>> [_] Anonymous 10/03/10(Sun)09:12 No.

  >>1387842
  even if you made this one, l4ppyloops made it first.
  anyway let's stop the pointless arguing, since my hair is a bird, etc, etc.

>> [_] Anonymous 10/03/10(Sun)09:19 No.

  >>1387842
  >>1387838

  I like it when people argue on my behalf. Thanks, internet helper!

  The cr4ppyloops guy can still go suck a dick.

>> [_] Anonymous 10/03/10(Sun)09:21 No.

  >>1387846
  awesome way of getting out of counter-arguing by changing the subject :clap:

>> [_] Anonymous 10/03/10(Sun)09:27 No.

  >>1387848

  You haven't proved fuck all. Done nothing to counter what I said except say 'no i did it first!'

  Suck
  My
  Juicy
  Dick

>> [_] Anonymous 10/03/10(Sun)09:30 No.

  >>1387851
  right right, bravo lord faggot

>> [_] Anonymous 10/03/10(Sun)09:30 No.

  >>1387851
  Neither have you.

>> [_] Anonymous 10/03/10(Sun)11:46 No.

  >>1387856
  He's not the one making unfounded claims, and is the only one to post any evidence whatsoever;
  the ball is in your court, and until you do anything other than say "no i remember" or "no it was
  me" you have lost this argument. Good day, sir.

>> [_] Anonymous 10/03/10(Sun)11:52 No.

  >>1387909
  numerous other people can also confirm this, but meh, arguing with a bunch of 4channers is more
  like walking into a playground full of toddlers and asking them to recite the theory of
  relativity. Good day.

>> [_] Anonymous 10/03/10(Sun)11:54 No.

  >>1387913
  >implying you're not also a '4channer'

>> [_] Anonymous 10/03/10(Sun)11:58 No.

  >>1387915
  >implying arguing with me isn't like that

>> [_] Anonymous 10/03/10(Sun)11:59 No.

  >>1387920
  But it's not, because you've already lost.

>> [_] Anonymous 10/03/10(Sun)12:01 No.

  >>1387922
  Not sure how I've lost considering the one bit of evidence he had is wrong because I've already
  got proof the site existed without it's own domain prior to that

>> [_] Anonymous 10/03/10(Sun)12:04 No.

  >>1387923
  And where is this proof of yours?

>> [_] ye !!4qEYOrL41u9 10/03/10(Sun)12:07 No.

  The numerous people who can confirm it, and the fact that it's mentioned months before April

>> [_] Anonymous 10/03/10(Sun)12:09 No.

  >>1387927
  still not seeing any proof there

>> [_] yamas03 10/03/10(Sun)12:14 No.

  >>1387929
  how about we just report your ass for stealing content and claiming it as your own?

>> [_] Anonymous 10/03/10(Sun)12:16 No.

  >>1387931

  Oh shi-

  You're gonna report us to the cyber police?

>> [_] Anonymous 10/03/10(Sun)12:18 No.

  >>1387931
  but see you can't do that because i'm the person who made this flash loop first

>> [_] yamas03 10/03/10(Sun)12:19 No.

  >>1387935
  according to nico nico,AND youtube I made this first!!

>> [_] yamas03 10/03/10(Sun)12:24 No.

  >>1387936
  no me!

  btw i am >>1387935

>> [_] yamas03 10/03/10(Sun)12:27 No.

  >>1387937
  you lying bastard

>> [_] L4ppy 10/03/10(Sun)12:28 No.

  Actually, I created L4ppyloops, and this was one of the very first loops I uploaded to my site.

  How about THAT for proof

>> [_] Anonymous 10/03/10(Sun)12:29 No.

  >>1387939
  But your site wasn't created until after I already made this loop.

>> [_] yamas03 10/03/10(Sun)12:31 No.

  >>1387940
  >>1387939
  both of you are lying bastards

>> [_] ye !!4qEYOrL41u9 10/03/10(Sun)12:36 No.

  wow, an argument staring me when i wasn't even here?
  classic.
  seems i got me a trip at the right time

>> [_] Deyogee !FmrgqX7l/E 10/03/10(Sun)13:11 No.

  sure is mad in here

>> [_] Anonymous 10/03/10(Sun)13:34 No.

  And if you look to your left, children, you will see a bunch of raging 12 year olds. please keep
  your arms inside the vehicle at all times. We don't want to come home with one less person
  because he was dragged into the stupid arguments, do we?