File[xtan_is_a_hottie.swf] - (36 KB)
[_] [H] Much better Anonymous 09/11/10(Sat)18:52 No.1371018
I'm done for now. Vote 5
>> [_] Anonymous 09/11/10(Sat)19:19 No.1371046
Ah, yes indeedy she is. >;-9
>> [_] Anonymous 09/11/10(Sat)19:33 No.1371069
condom socks
>> [_] Anonymous 09/11/10(Sat)19:35 No.1371072
The loose bit on the end of the socks could be a little less exaggerated. This also needs the
subtle, white shine on her bottom, shoulder and elbow that the original image had.
>> [_] Anonymous 09/11/10(Sat)19:40 No.1371079
So... you animated a trace-job of one of the x-tan pictures... and crudely crossed-out the
artist's signature.
>> [_] Anonymous 09/11/10(Sat)19:49 No.1371084
>>1371079
"by anonymous" is much better any day
>> [_] Anonymous 09/11/10(Sat)19:54 No.1371091
i require some footjobs
>> [_] Anonymous 09/11/10(Sat)19:55 No.1371092
Needs moar /d/
>> [_] Anonymous 09/11/10(Sat)20:14 No.1371113
>>1371084
Funny, usually when someone is caught tracing, the great 'anonymous legion' is all too eager to
bring them down. Guess you only give a shit when it's some big-name artist doing the thieving.
>> [_] Anonymous 09/11/10(Sat)20:14 No.1371116
>>1371072
it is there
>> [_] Anonymous 09/11/10(Sat)20:16 No.1371118
>>1371116
Yes, I was just about to post this. My mistake.
>> [_] Anonymous 09/11/10(Sat)20:42 No.1371142
>>1371113
this isn't so much being caught tracing though. This is 'hey, look at my trace'
>> [_] Anonymous 09/11/10(Sat)20:47 No.1371144
>>1371142
I guess.
And I admit that crossing out the artist's signature bugs me particularly because I kind of know
the original artist. They're a cool person and deserve credit for their work.
>> [_] Anonymous 09/11/10(Sat)20:50 No.1371146
>>1371113
>caught tracing
>implying he was in any way at all trying to hide the fact that this is a trace
Dude was only doing it because there were two crappy traces posted last night and he wanted to
show how it was done.
>> [_] Anonymous 09/11/10(Sat)20:53 No.1371148
>>1371146
Like I said, this just makes me kind of butthurt because crossing out the artist's sig feels like
a diss to that person.
>> [_] Anonymous 09/11/10(Sat)20:57 No.1371155
>>1371144
>>1371148
I did still leave it on there, just not on the front.
>> [_] Anonymous 09/11/10(Sat)21:09 No.1371161
needs less exaderated bloom
>> [_] Anonymous 09/11/10(Sat)21:17 No.1371168
Click her ass to see the original art, and click her boob to make her shirt disappear.
>> [_] Anonymous 09/11/10(Sat)21:19 No.1371169
>>1371168
FUCKING
HOW DID I NOT TRY THIS THE FIRST TIME
THIS FLASH IS NOW BEST FLASH
>> [_] Anonymous 09/11/10(Sat)21:28 No.1371179
>>1371169
i lol'd
>> [_] Anonymous 09/11/10(Sat)21:31 No.1371182
>>1371169
>> [_] Anonymous 09/11/10(Sat)21:39 No.1371188
It's not theft in my eyes since the original is still there with the artist's sig. The flash
render of the project is fine as long as it credits the original. This one does, so good work.
>> [_] Anonymous 09/11/10(Sat)21:40 No.1371189
There really need to be more pictures of X-tan drawn.
and then turned into topless flashes
>> [_] Anonymous 09/11/10(Sat)22:36 No.1371233
>>1371155
At first I didn't get what you were talking about, since all I saw was the signature crossed-out.
Then I saw >>1371168 , and got what you meant.
Okay, that renders my previous butthurt a moot pointm, please pardon my faggotry.
>>1371188
Yes, what you said. I didn't know this was at all interactive at first, so I didn't see that bit.
I am a derp.
