File[Reo.swf] - (6.77 MB)
[_] [L] Anonymous 06/27/11(Mon)11:44 No.

  You're a fuckin' cat, Reo.

Marked for deletion (old).

>> [_] Anonymous 06/27/11(Mon)11:53 No.

  Reo isn't just a cat.. he's my friend.

>> [_] Anonymous2 06/27/11(Mon)12:02 No.

  I will never see why anybody with an IQ above 40 would like this flash.

>> [_] Anonymous 06/27/11(Mon)12:11 No.

  >>1529369
  >stoplikingwhatidontlike.jpg
  *fixed

>> [_] Anonymous 06/27/11(Mon)13:19 No.

  >>1529369
  I have an IQ of >140 and I find it hilarious, so kindly stfu

>> [_] Anonymous2 06/27/11(Mon)13:22 No.

  >>1529387
  Obviously so. I have an IQ of I don't know, and I know how to add periods.
  >>1529373
  I didn't say people shouldn't like it, I just said I don't understand why they do.

>> [_] Anonymous 06/27/11(Mon)13:24 No.

  >>1529389

  You're gonna get worked up over a missing period? Seriously?

>> [_] Anonymous2 06/27/11(Mon)13:28 No.

  >>1529391
  If you would like to debate your intelligence level, I'll also get worked up over your inability
  to use the phrase "going to" and the fact that your first sentence wasn't a question, but both of
  those would be off topic replies, so I'm not going to point them out. I just was saying I don't
  see why anybody would think it's funny. He just swears at a cat.

>> [_] csstener !YgQRHAJqRA 06/27/11(Mon)13:55 No.

  >>1529389
  "I just said I don't understand why they do."
  So you confirm that your IQ is lower than 40

>> [_] Anonymous2 06/27/11(Mon)13:59 No.

  >>1529394
  I don't see what that has to do with the flash.

>> [_] Anonymous 06/27/11(Mon)14:23 No.

  >>1529395
  You've already spun off a tangent about I.Q.s so making an conscious
  effort to stay on topic now is pointless. If you don't like the flash that's
  your preference, but suggesting a person need lack intelligence to enjoy
  it is clearly a biased insult. It's saying the people that disagree with your
  preferences are all invariably of low intelligence rather than acknowledging
  they are simply different people with different tastes.

  I'm guessing you're one of those people I see throwing around the word
  "summerfag" every time someone disagrees with them rather than to
  describe someone with a clear lack of experience for which the term is
  ACTUALLY used.

>> [_] Anonymous 06/27/11(Mon)14:25 No.

  >>1529397
  tl;dr?
  Reo is a motherfucking cat.

>> [_] Anonymous 06/27/11(Mon)14:29 No.

  I lol'd, despite myself.

>> [_] Anonymous2 06/27/11(Mon)14:30 No.

  >>1529397
  I never stated a person must lack intelligence, I just stated that I can easily see how somebody
  with said lack would enjoy it. I also don't see how a grown man could like my little pony, but I
  clearly see how a little girl would. It's the same concept, and I'm not calling the man a little
  girl. Stop taking everything so bloody personally and have a little self-confidence. I didn't
  meant to hurt your feelings, go back to watching Reo be a cat. You should tell your friends about
  the flash, too. You should say how hilarious it was. You should tell them that this guy was
  yelling obcenities at a cat. I'm sure they would get a kick out of that.

>> [_] Anonymous 06/27/11(Mon)15:00 No.

  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EC1qdLEgd4o

>> [_] Kill yourselves DA JUDGE 06/27/11(Mon)19:44 No.

  >>1529368
  >>1529373
  >>1529387
  >>1529389
  >>1529391
  >>1529392
  >>1529394
  >>1529397
  >>1529398
  >>1529399
  >>1529400

  >>WAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

  INTERNET ARGUMENT ON /F/

>> [_] Anonymous2 06/27/11(Mon)20:23 No.

  >>1529507
  Don't blame me. Appearantly not liking this flash causes large amount of angst and butthurt.

>> [_] Anonymous 06/27/11(Mon)20:28 No.

  >>1529524
  omfg stfu already gtfo ::I: ò_ó :I::

>> [_] Anonymous2 06/27/11(Mon)20:56 No.

  >>1529528
  Just calm down. Not everybody has to share opinions. Different strokes for different blokes, no?

>> [_] Anonymous 06/27/11(Mon)21:00 No.

  >>1529538
  You! Stop terrorizing this thread.
  Reo dosen't like it. (He's a fucking cat).

>> [_] Anonymous 06/27/11(Mon)21:32 No.

  Is that a fuckin' cat?

>> [_] Anonymous 06/27/11(Mon)21:56 No.

  LOOKIT ME, IMMA PERSON

>> [_] Anonymous 06/27/11(Mon)22:20 No.

  >>1529400
  >>I also don't see how a grown man could like my little pony
  Because your views are backward and sexist.

>> [_] Anonymous 06/27/11(Mon)22:31 No.

  >>1529569
  I'm a grown man and I don't like ponies.
  >because it's meant for 8-year-old girls.

>> [_] Anonymous 06/27/11(Mon)22:39 No.

  >>"I will never see why anybody with an IQ above 40 would like this flash."
  >>somebody else mentions IQ
  >>"I don't see what that has to do with the flash."
  >>"and the fact that your first sentence wasn't a question"
  >>missed that it WAS a question, just simply didn't have the word "are" at the beginning
  >>"I never stated a person must lack intelligence"
  >>proceeds to insult people based on intelligence
  >>gets worked up over missing period
  >>can't spell "obscenities"

  If you're not a troll, you're a fucking moron. You seem obsessed with tiny details in things, yet
  at the same time miss the point of things both big AND small.

>> [_] Anonymous 06/27/11(Mon)22:41 No.

  >>1529584
  cont'd
  >>1529373
  Was right on the money. You don't like something and think it's stupid, therefore everybody else
  shouldn't like it unless they're stupid.

  tl;dr: Your opinion =/= fact. Stupid things can be funny, you don't have to be stupid to like
  them.

  That you believe both of those things to be untrue means I can only say may God have mercy on
  your soul.

>> [_] Anonymous 06/27/11(Mon)22:43 No.

  >>1529581
  No, it's not.
  To quote the creator:
  "I didn't create this show for little girls, I created it for little girls and their parents -
  including MALE parents. It only stands to reason that adult animation fans without children may
  like it, too.

  The belief that boys shouldn't be interested in girl things is the main reason there's hardly
  anything decent for girls in animation - or almost any media, for that matter. It's a backwards,
  sexist, outdated attitude."

>> [_] Anonymous 06/27/11(Mon)22:47 No.

  >>1529587
  >The belief boys can't be interesting in girl things pretty much = sexism in the future

  This bitch is retarded. This is what causes gays. Boys need to learn what's meant for boys, and
  girls need to know what's meant for girls. There's no sexism in that.
  Besides, why are you even dragging in pony shit when REO IS A FUCKING CAT?

>> [_] Anonymous 06/27/11(Mon)22:51 No.

  >>1529590
  The other guy brought it up, not me.

  And sorry to break it to you, but you're wrong. You're sexist. And probably a homophobe too as
  you think that's what "causes gays".

  I honestly hope you're a troll, if not I feel sorry for you and can only hope you don't breed.

  I'm out.

>> [_] Anonymous 06/27/11(Mon)22:57 No.

  >>1529591
  >ponyfag thinks having things directed toward men and others directed towards girls (like the
  past 100 years) are sexist.
  Well, then. By your logic, we should all just cross-dress and make men make sandwiches.
  Silly moralfag, dicks are for chicks! Also 4chan isn't the place for you to be butthurt over
  sexism/homophobism/etc.

>> [_] Anonymous 06/27/11(Mon)22:59 No.

  >>1529591
  forgot to mention: >>1529594
  REO IS A FUCKING CAT! HE HAS CAT PARTS TO PROVE THAT SHIT.

>> [_] Anonymous 06/27/11(Mon)23:02 No.

  >>1529594
  I'm not >>1529591 but boys don't have to do just boy things, and girls don't have to do just girl
  things. That's retarded. It doesn't mean all men have to crossdress and make sandwiches, it just
  means unless it's directly related to something to do with the physical fact of having a body of
  a certain gender, labelling something only for girls/boys is stupid.

  Also, 4chan isn't /b/. Getting the two things confused shows a very basic lack of understanding.

>> [_] Anonymous 06/27/11(Mon)23:05 No.

  "You're going to(gonna) get worked up over a missing period?"
  This is perfectly fine, save for the gonna which is irrelevant anyway. It's true that it could
  also be a statement, but that doesn't mean it can't be a question. Tone defines that when
  speaking. And yes, I know you can't hear how someone intended their post to sound but the
  question mark adds the tone when in written form.

  Liking this flash has little to do with intelligence. It could come from seeing a man,
  presumably, though he could be a teenager and not yet a man, speaking to a cat as if the cat
  understands what his words mean or from the cats reactions to his constant yelling or a number of
  reasons that would have to be mentioned by someone who finds it funny for them.

>> [_] Anonymous 06/27/11(Mon)23:05 No.

  IQ is an iffy subject at best. If I remember correctly, 60 was considered mentally retarded and
  100 is average, other numbers falling in place according. This number is measured based upon the
  amount of information you know, usually information pertaining to Literature and Math, in
  comparison to the amount of information you should know according to the group you fall into,
  usually divided by age. In my example, this doesn't entertain via literature nor math, thus to
  garner entertainment from this flash, you do not need a high IQ based on those traits.

>> [_] Anonymous 06/27/11(Mon)23:06 No.

  The conclusion may also be drawn that one does not need a high IQ to enjoy this flash. This is
  not congruent with the statement that says one must have a low IQ to enjoy it. The only reason to
  state the latter is the desire to isolate their interests so that people who they consider lower
  than them won't be seen on the same plateau. This is commonly referred to as elitism.

  Now, Anonymous2, I'm not saying you're an elitist per se. I don't know you, therefor I can't
  determine that. If I were to base that opinion solely on your first post in this thread, I would
  come to that conclusion. I know, however, that sometimes we type things with haste, without
  thinking about how people may perceive them. So I'm not going to accuse you of something you may
  not be.

>> [_] Anonymous 06/27/11(Mon)23:06 No.

  >>1529598
  Not getting anything mixed up here. I've seen sexism/racism/and even homophobism on other boards.
  Your argument is invalid.

  As for your other point: Let's say, at a store, there's some panties/lingerie. Would a (real) man
  buy it? Only if it were for a woman, otherwise no. Because it's for women.
  So all in all, I have my views, you have yours. STFU.

>> [_] Anonymous 06/27/11(Mon)23:09 No.

  >>1529601
  >>1529600
  >>1529599

  Sorry about the triple post. The text limit was smaller than I though.

>> [_] Anonymous 06/27/11(Mon)23:09 No.

  This thread is shit.

>> [_] Anonymous 06/27/11(Mon)23:10 No.

  >>1529602
  Obviously it bleeds over, you can't stop it. But that doesn't mean that all boards are the same
  as /b/.

  And yes, a "real" man could go in and buy a pair of women's underwear for himself. In fact,
  that's a piss-poor example, because many completely straight men will wear a pair of women's
  underwear for one reason or another.

>> [_] Anonymous 06/27/11(Mon)23:11 No.

  >>1529605
  Damn. You must be short.

>> [_] Anonymous 06/27/11(Mon)23:12 No.

  >>1529602
  No no, good sir, what causes "gays" is the amazing power of the prostate orgasm, among a number
  of other things. It can't be pinned to one solitary act.

>> [_] Anonymous 06/27/11(Mon)23:13 No.

  >>1529602
  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_true_Scotsman

>> [_] Anonymous 06/27/11(Mon)23:14 No.

  >>1529607
  Those men must be closetfags.

  Still, I HAVE MY VIEWS, YOU HAVE YOURS. KINDLY STFU.
  >dealwithit.jpg

>> [_] Anonymous 06/27/11(Mon)23:16 No.

  Let's just get this thread back on the topic of Reo being a fucking cat, mmmk?

>> [_] Anonymous 06/27/11(Mon)23:18 No.

  >>1529612
  Sure thing anon. We know Reo is a cat. But, and I'm just going out on a limb here, what if Ryu
  was a cat? Or what if Zelda was a girl? Just pondering.

>> [_] Anonymous 06/27/11(Mon)23:19 No.

  >>1529607
  Also you just admitted it was WOMEN'S underwear.

  There. Remember what they say about arguing on the internet.

>> [_] Anonymous 06/27/11(Mon)23:19 No.

  This is the most replies to a flash I've seen on /f/, and it's all an argument about how stupid
  the video is. Goddamn.

>> [_] Anonymous 06/27/11(Mon)23:20 No.

  >>1529613
  The world would asplode.

>> [_] Anonymous 06/27/11(Mon)23:20 No.

  >>1529611
  One example would be buying some a wearing it on a dare. Another is because their girlfriend
  asked them too for erotic or humor reasons. Does that make a man a closetfag? Also:
  Autogynephilia. Look it up.

  And no, I won't shut up. I like how you're saying "I have my opinions and you have yours, so now
  shut up and stop talking about yours".

  Yes, we do both have our own views, but I'm not going to stop talking about mine because you tell
  me to, the same as I won't tell you to stop talking about yours.

  Oh, and my "views" aren't opinion. They're fact. It's a fact that a straight man can wear women's
  underwear. If you think that any man to ever wear underwear of the other gender is secretly gay
  then you're clearly an idiot, because only an idiot would make such a sweeping generalization,
  let alone one that's so obviously untrue.

>> [_] Anonymous 06/27/11(Mon)23:22 No.

  >>1529614
  That's because one, you labelled it as such, two, it's created for women though men can wear it,
  and three, that's what it's known as.

  In fact, that's my point. Of course there are things that are made just for men or just for
  women, but just because it's labelled as such doesn't mean someone of the other gender can't use
  it.

>> [_] Anonymous 06/27/11(Mon)23:23 No.

  >>1529618
  >DERP DERP I CANT LET AN ARGUMENT GO BECAUSE SOME GUY ON THE INTERNET DOSEN'T AGREE TO MY
  UNDERSTANDINGS AND WON'T ACCEPT THEM AS FACT HURRR

>> [_] Anonymous 06/27/11(Mon)23:25 No.

  >>1529620
  >2, it's created for women
  Well, there you go.
  Now, those companies don't get sued for sexism by making underwear meant for women, right?

>> [_] Anonymous 06/27/11(Mon)23:27 No.

  If I was a mod, I'd ban all of you.

>> [_] Anonymous 06/27/11(Mon)23:28 No.

  >>1529618
  The more general your statement, the easier it is to call it a fact. It is easier to prove that
  something sometimes is than it is to prove that something always is. So, to say a straight man
  can wear lady's undergarments and remain straight can be called a fact because it only needs one
  example of a straight man doing so to prove correct. If something can happen once, and thus had a
  probability of happening, it can happen again. On the other hand, to say that any man who wears,
  or has worn, or bought for themselves for that matter, lady's undergarments is gay or in the
  closet needs at least one example of a man doing so and not being gay to be proven wrong.

  In any argument over fact or opinion, in most cases, anything stated as an absolute will be
  opinion whilst anything stated as only being true sometimes will be a fact.

>> [_] Anonymous 06/27/11(Mon)23:30 No.

  >>1529626
  Look who's taken an introductory logic course.

>> [_] Anonymous 06/27/11(Mon)23:31 No.

  >>1529624
  No sir, because they don't bar men from buying it. You can't be sued for making a recommendation.
  For instance, the underwear was made with the female figure in mind, thus it can be claimed to be
  female underwear. They could, however, be sued for sexism(though I don't know the laws on this to
  say for certain, selling to who you want regardless of whether it is biased or excluding may be
  perfectly legal for all I know), if they refused to sell the underwear to men at all.

>> [_] Anonymous 06/27/11(Mon)23:35 No.

  >>1529628
  I... actually don't know if such a thing exists to be honest. I feel you could be insulting me
  for pointing out something that anyone should find as obvious. But in case there really is such a
  thing, I'm not taking it. I'm just putting out ideas from years of watching conversations
  quietly. I just felt like adding that statement because he mentioned opinion and fact.

>> [_] Anonymous 06/27/11(Mon)23:36 No.

  >>1529629
  I can't believe you're still arguing on the internet just because I won't accept what you say as
  fact. That's narcissism at it's best.
  Look, no matter how much you argue, no matter how angry you may be, no matter how much you
  explain shit to me,
  I will believe exactly the same things as I did before I even entered this thread. If you can't
  deal with that, fine. Just let it rest, and watch Reo be a fucking cat for God's sakes.
  Have a wonderful day.

>> [_] Anonymous 06/27/11(Mon)23:39 No.

  >>1529631
  Yeah, pretty much. Now just stop posting.

>> [_] Anonymous 06/27/11(Mon)23:44 No.

  >>1529632
  I'll answer this because you responded to my post. I wasn't trying to make you change your
  opinion in any of my posts. I don't really care if you think only people with a low IQ can enjoy
  this flash. It is your opinion, whether it can be proven wrong or not means nothing on whether
  you should continue to have it. In my last post, I was answering your question, yes it was
  rhetorical I don't care, about why companies don't get sued for branding their clothing as
  designed for women.

  Now, I did try to prove your opinion wrong in a lot of my posts. Only because that's who I am,
  not because I wanted you to change it. I play devil's advocate(Though not in this case mind.) to
  a lot of things. I enjoy making people think more about their opinions because in the process I
  think more about them. If I get you to change your mind, that's a plus. If you get me to change
  mine, that's also a plus. If neither change, I had fun. That's all I care about.

>> [_] Anonymous 06/27/11(Mon)23:46 No.

  >>1529633
  Nah, I think I'll continue posting as long as others continue to and I decide I have something to
  say. I'm sorry if you find my posts annoying but I'd like to remind you that I'm not forcing you
  to read them.

>> [_] Anonymous 06/27/11(Mon)23:47 No.

  >>1529636
  >I'll answer this because you responded to my post.
  Oh boy, this could go on for a while.

>> [_] Anonymous 06/27/11(Mon)23:47 No.

  >>1529637
  CONGRATULATIONS! You are the 60th commenter!

>> [_] Anonymous 06/27/11(Mon)23:48 No.

  >>1529636
  I never said anything about anyone's IQ. That would be Anonymous2

>> [_] Anonymous 06/27/11(Mon)23:48 No.

  >>1529640
  It certainly could. Maybe we'll make a record for number of posts in /f/ on a single thread.
  Though I haven't seen any get longer than this one as is.

>> [_] Anonymous 06/27/11(Mon)23:49 No.

  >>1529637
  >I'd like to remind you that I'm not forcing you to read them.
  Oh, well, in that case I'll just be on my way.

>> [_] Anonymous 06/27/11(Mon)23:52 No.

  >>1529636
  Also, I'm just going to start tl;dr'ing everything you post because you just keep going.

  If I really have to remind you or you've never heard of this, here:
  Arguing on the Internet is like running in the special olympics;
  Even if you win, you're still retarded.

>> [_] Anonymous 06/27/11(Mon)23:55 No.

  >>1529645
  Unless of course, you don't argue to win. In which case, as I'm arguing simply for fun and am
  completely amused, I'm content retarded.

>> [_] Anonymous 06/27/11(Mon)23:58 No.

  >>1529646
  As long as you know...

>> [_] Anonymous 06/27/11(Mon)23:59 No.

  >>1529646
  Does this mean you're done? We can stop posting about lady's underwear, and sexism, and beliefs
  for once? We can stop making this the longest /f/ thread in history?

>> [_] Anonymous 06/28/11(Tue)00:00 No.

  >>1529649
  On second thought, let's make this the longest /f/ thread in history. I'd be proud to hold the
  title of being majorly involved in it.

>> [_] Anonymous 06/28/11(Tue)00:03 No.

  >>1529651
  Yeah, I kind of completely flipped my goal of getting everyone to shut up.

>> [_] Anonymous 06/28/11(Tue)00:04 No.

  >>1529653
  Well, kind sir, do you know what the current longest one is?

>> [_] Anonymous 06/28/11(Tue)00:08 No.

  >>1529653
  Because we're at 70-something posts as is.

>> [_] Anonymous 06/28/11(Tue)00:09 No.

  >>1529654
  I don't know the longest, but I found one on swfchan which apparently had 140 posts.

>> [_] Anonymous 06/28/11(Tue)00:11 No.

  >>1529656
  Yeah, I guess we might as well keep going. I have no idea if anyone's ever cared enough to keep
  track.

>> [_] Anonymous 06/28/11(Tue)00:11 No.

  >>1529657
  And now I just found one with 212.

>> [_] Anonymous 06/28/11(Tue)00:12 No.

  >>1529660
  Well fuck. Reo is a cat.

>> [_] Anonymous 06/28/11(Tue)00:13 No.

  >>1529657
  Well, this thread is longer than some brand-new Zone threads. That's gotta count for something
  right?

>> [_] Anonymous 06/28/11(Tue)00:14 No.

  >>1529661
  DAAAAAYYYUUUUUUUUUMMMMMMMMMM

>> [_] Anonymous 06/28/11(Tue)00:17 No.

  I like the part where he yells at Reo.

>> [_] Anonymous 06/28/11(Tue)00:19 No.

  I like the new one.
  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cp04sauiP0M&feature=mfu_in_order&list=UL

>> [_] Anonymous 06/28/11(Tue)01:03 No.

  >>1529369
  smells like summer for sure.

>> [_] Anonymous 06/28/11(Tue)01:31 No.

  80+ comments on a flash video.

  Amazing..

>> [_] Anonymous 06/28/11(Tue)01:49 No.

  Hey guys, what's up? I heard there was an internet argument on /f/ so I had to check it out.

>> [_] Anonymous 06/28/11(Tue)02:06 No.

  84 comments, on a fucking cat? Are you guys kidding me?

>> [_] Cirque 1334 7014 5103 !dO3MaJJL2k 06/28/11(Tue)03:27 No.

  Posting for posterity.

>> [_] Anonymous 06/28/11(Tue)03:33 No.

  lolol

>> [_] Anonymous 06/28/11(Tue)03:41 No.

  in on legendary
  hurf durf de durf derp

>> [_] Anonymous 06/28/11(Tue)03:43 No.

  Come back two hours later to see it somehow isn't gone. Amazing.

>> [_] Anonymous 06/28/11(Tue)03:53 No.

  89 posts holy duck fuck when will it stop?

>> [_] Anonymous 06/28/11(Tue)03:54 No.

  I believe swfchan will tell you that the latest Hentai Key Girl by Zone exceeded 500 replies.

>> [_] Anonymous 06/28/11(Tue)03:55 No.

  >>1529738
  668
  There are a few other threads above 300, almost all of them in 2010.

>> [_] Anonymous 06/28/11(Tue)04:00 No.

  who gives a shit what flash got how may posts? fuck off.

>> [_] Anonymous 06/28/11(Tue)04:01 No.

  >>1529742
  DISREGARD THAT I SUCK COCKS!

>> [_] Anonymous 06/28/11(Tue)04:02 No.

  It would be fucking funny is this got like 600+ posts, it is retarded.

>> [_] Anonymous 06/28/11(Tue)04:03 No.

  >>1529743
  Hey man be cool.
  And go fFUCK your mom like i did.