File :[CPU.swf] - (4.12 MB)
[_] [?] Can your PC handle this on Fullscreen? Anonymous 03/03/09(Tue)06:43 No.912115
Check your taskmanager
Marked for deletion (old).
>> [_] ÂAnonOsaka !rEjCsBbT.6 03/03/09(Tue)06:46 No.912118
84% nigger
>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/09(Tue)06:48 No.912119
97%...
>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/09(Tue)06:57 No.912123
54% @ E5200...
>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/09(Tue)06:59 No.912124
38% Dual quadcore q6600
>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/09(Tue)07:02 No.912125
123% 1680x1050 T8100
>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/09(Tue)07:05 No.912127
100% on school comp
>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/09(Tue)07:34 No.912141
+/- 50%
>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/09(Tue)07:36 No.912142
86-92%
>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/09(Tue)07:37 No.912144
sauce on track?????
>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/09(Tue)07:37 No.912145
i came.
>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/09(Tue)07:38 No.912146
52% on 1280x960 LOL
>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/09(Tue)07:40 No.912148
sauce?
>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/09(Tue)07:53 No.912150
82% on T7300@1440X900
>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/09(Tue)07:57 No.912151
70-80%
>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/09(Tue)08:11 No.912157
>>912144
last days of humanity - A Divine Proclamation for Finishing the Present Existance
>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/09(Tue)08:12 No.912158
also, this is actually the whole song
>> [_] CACTUAR 03/03/09(Tue)08:51 No.912163
3% LOL!!!
EPIC FAIL ANON
>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/09(Tue)09:40 No.912179
52% 1440x900 Q6600
>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/09(Tue)09:50 No.912180
1680x1050
80%
Athlon X2 5800 (3GHz)
>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/09(Tue)10:06 No.912184
18% Phenom II @4.11GHz
>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/09(Tue)10:10 No.912187
Full screen on a budget computer, lol
>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/09(Tue)10:43 No.912201
75%~80% on a Q6600 at 1680x1050.
Firefox / Vista 64
>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/09(Tue)10:49 No.912203
My computer changed the frame rate for some reason. Like it didn't slow down but it removed
frames and when full speed or soemthing.
>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/09(Tue)10:52 No.912205
58-63% on PC from 6 years ago (AMD Sempron 2500+). Browser - Google Chrome. Resolution -
1280x1024. OS - Win XP pro, SP3.
>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/09(Tue)11:21 No.912216
13% on my Macintosh with a Intel Core 2 Duo.
>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/09(Tue)11:33 No.912218
>>912216
I laugh at the fact, that Macs decided to switch to CISC architecture after all. IBM-compatible
Macs. I want to shit on every of them.
>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/09(Tue)11:46 No.912227
>>912218
Eh, if anything switching to Intel has reduced the cost of Macs. Got this Mac Mini for $550
Refurbished from Apple. Powerful, yet my penis is larger than it. I love that something smaller
than my penis, is very fucking powerful :D
>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/09(Tue)11:48 No.912229
Way to fuck up something that was originally funny and somewhat relevant with Touhou. Again.
>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/09(Tue)11:51 No.912230
148%, 2.6ghz C2D, Safari 4, 1920x1200, and it's still missing frames. It's the same in Firefox.
Flash + OS X 10.5.7 = Nooo?
>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/09(Tue)11:57 No.912232
>>912124
>38% Dual quadcore q6600
So your computer has 8 cores? Why don't you check again newfag.
>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/09(Tue)12:10 No.912241
89%-93%
1280x1024
Intel P4 (3ghz)
Please to be forgiving the lack of hardware knowledges plox. Picking your cottons.
>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/09(Tue)12:10 No.912242
66% with WoW running in the background
>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/09(Tue)12:13 No.912245
>>912232
It could have 8 cores. I doubt the flash is multi-threaded. you fail at compootars.
>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/09(Tue)12:26 No.912250
itt: people thinking they actually have a good computer when they don't realize that flash only
uses one core and they also have 800x600 in resolution + also alot of other things that doesn't
make this a proper cpu test at all
>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/09(Tue)12:27 No.912251
>>912241
>Picking your cottons.
best excuse...ever
>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/09(Tue)12:27 No.912252
AMD 4800 x64, 2.5GHz clocked to 3.6GHz
21%
1360x768+1280x1024 (double monitor if someone doesn't get it)
>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/09(Tue)12:28 No.912253
30% at 1900x1600.
Come on.
>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/09(Tue)13:03 No.912272
koa and patchu make the touhou sound test faces :D
>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/09(Tue)13:11 No.912275
Thanks /f/. My computer is tied to a cloud computing resource. This thing nearly took down the
entire subnet.
>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/09(Tue)13:43 No.912286
60-70%
>> [_] needed moar /v/ /m/ Anonymous 03/03/09(Tue)13:44 No.912288
~65% on both core on my Core 2 Due OC'd to 3.2
>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/09(Tue)14:03 No.912295
75% on core1
45% on core2
1680x1050
>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/09(Tue)14:15 No.912303
>>912229
/r/ origional
>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/09(Tue)14:40 No.912320
here ya go >>912303
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=InZNBcJTmWs&feature=related
>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/09(Tue)14:44 No.912324
72% and I'm running a shitload of other programs right now.
>> [_] Super speed! Anonymous 03/03/09(Tue)14:50 No.912328
85% at 1880 X 1440
2.0 gb 64 Amd X2
windows XP
Direct X 10
set to High
>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/09(Tue)15:34 No.912344
flash animations are fucking fail at one point because they're should use GPU
anyway on my athlon 2GHz it's 100%
>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/09(Tue)15:44 No.912354
fail idiots...
fuck flash is not multi-threaded. when you run at 25% on a single core, it's pinning that core,
and leaving the others unused.
plus, flash on the mac uses the gpu.
>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/09(Tue)15:59 No.912362
100% and blew up my left headphone speaker...
>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/09(Tue)16:03 No.912364
>>912354
lie
it uses GPU only if flash have right command in script
from version 9.112.xxx flashes uses GPU but without right coding it's useless
>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/09(Tue)16:04 No.912365
87-93%
>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/09(Tue)16:27 No.912379
88%
>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/09(Tue)16:37 No.912385
>>912232
Dual processor motherboard (or even more). Such motherboards are often used on servers. BTW, they
were developed long before multicore processors.
>> [_] Turtletron !t0of944Ftw 03/03/09(Tue)16:43 No.912389
70%
>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/09(Tue)16:43 No.912390
100% with no slowdown.
Weird.
>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/09(Tue)16:49 No.912393
95%
1280x1024
P4 3.0GHZ
And running in a near freeze status. If I switch to low quality it runs just fine.
>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/09(Tue)16:57 No.912397
50-60% with other programs running.
CPU: i7 920 (2.67 Ghz)
Resolution: 1920x1200
>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/09(Tue)17:09 No.912404
80% AMD 64 X2 Dual Core 3800+
@ 1280 x 1024 resolution.
>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/09(Tue)17:14 No.912406
Answer: No. But why would I want it to? Sounds like a shipment of drums crashed into Mt. Everest.
>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/09(Tue)17:21 No.912408
I don't know... my system crashed... is that a bad thing?
:`(
>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/09(Tue)17:24 No.912413
100% amd athlon 3200+ lewl
>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/09(Tue)17:26 No.912414
lol why isnt there much diff from playing it and not?
>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/09(Tue)17:43 No.912435
89% Core 2 Duo T7300 @ 2ghz
>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/09(Tue)17:54 No.912444
>>912275
Haha, oh wow.
>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/09(Tue)17:54 No.912445
85% with other programs running. wth was that thing
>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/09(Tue)17:57 No.912451
>>912250
flash CAN be multithreaded. But you have to program it specifically to be. Dual-core and
single-core algorithms are extremely different.
>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/09(Tue)17:58 No.912454
>>912451
btw this flash is not. it pins a single core; how ever many cored you have, it only takes up one.
>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/09(Tue)17:59 No.912456
what did i just see
