File :[giraffenstein.swf] - (26 KB)
[_] [?] Anonymous 02/13/09(Fri)03:44 No.896044
seems like a reputable guy with accurate information
Marked for deletion (old).
>> [_] Anonymous 02/13/09(Fri)04:19 No.896055
>>896044
seems like a troll with a stick up his ass.
>> [_] Anonymous 02/13/09(Fri)04:40 No.896061
rednecks don't get humor lol
>> [_] Anonymous 02/13/09(Fri)05:17 No.896080
The sad thing is, this is actually serious. Its on a Christian site for kids. Some people
actually believe this.
>> [_] Anonymous 02/13/09(Fri)05:43 No.896091
>>896080
It's hilarious how far creationists go. It's insanity.
Science can bring television, cellphones, computers, get humans to walk on the moon, the internet
and more and yet is 100% wrong on genetics, biology, geology and astronomy?
Also the flood never happened, not a shred of physical evidence where you would expect to find it.
>> [_] Anonymous 02/13/09(Fri)06:19 No.896101
>>896055
What's with all the angry 13 year olds on /f/ tonight?
>> [_] Anonymous 02/13/09(Fri)06:30 No.896107
>>896091
It's not creationism vs science. It's creationism vs evolution.
Creationism and evolution are both opinions about science.
>> [_] Anonymous 02/13/09(Fri)07:07 No.896127
>>896101
4chan is a teenfest nowadays.
>> [_] Anonymous 02/13/09(Fri)07:45 No.896136
>>896127
Trying to act mature and smart on 4chan is like trying to, nevermind. EAT A DICK, NIGGER!
>> [_] Anonymous 02/13/09(Fri)07:51 No.896138
ignorance at its best...
oh wait i forgot where i was
FAGGOTS
>> [_] Anonymous 02/13/09(Fri)07:57 No.896142
>>896107
Science is not about opinions. It is about empirical evidence. There is no such evidence for
anything these people have to say. Creationism is a baseless theory that is accepted out of
"faith," the very opposite scientific procedure.
>> [_] Anonymous 02/13/09(Fri)07:59 No.896143
>>896107
Two opinions but whilst one is based on observing phyisical evidence and consistant results from
experiments and drawing logical conclusions the other is
"Fucking Magic!"
Take a guess which is which.
I'm gonna go on a limb here and say that science has won again.
>> [_] Anonymous 02/13/09(Fri)08:06 No.896147
>>896142
Don't be so naive as to assume that 'science' is a faithless belief system. Just as much 'faith'
is put into science as is put into any religion.
>> [_] Anonymous 02/13/09(Fri)08:20 No.896156
Y'all niggers be posting in a troll thread.
>> [_] Anonymous 02/13/09(Fri)09:30 No.896179
Giraffenstein is a jew, obviously
>> [_] Anonymous 02/13/09(Fri)09:55 No.896198
fuck this guy knows EVERYTHING.
i didnt know the universe could be explained so simply.
>> [_] Anonymous 02/13/09(Fri)10:00 No.896201
IM GODS WARRIOR
http://objectiveministries.org/
also according to this site, because obama did not use a bible during his inaugeration he is our
first athiest-president.
wow after the first athiest pope? holy shit you yankees are behind!
>> [_] Anonymous 02/13/09(Fri)10:23 No.896206
>>896201
Funny, I seem to recall he used the same bible Abraham Lincoln was sworn in on.
>>896107
>>896147
2/10, troll.
>> [_] YOU BELEIVE IN INTELLIGENT DESIGN?!?!? /b/tards are /re/tards.Go /f/aggots.
02/13/09(Fri)10:54 No.896214
ID isn't real. Natural Selection is much more accurate. God does exist, but NOT Intelligent
Design.
>> [_] Anonymous 02/13/09(Fri)10:58 No.896215
Well, I lolled.
Seriously, the bullshit creationists pull out of their asses to try and justify their pseudo
science claim to how the world was made.
And double lol at "Cain married his sister"
According to that, all Christians are inbred! Why am I not surprised?
>> [_] Anonymous 02/13/09(Fri)11:08 No.896217
And the new fag of the year gos to...
Oh my god I don't believe it post number >>896136.
CONGRATULATIONS POST NUMBER >>896136 YOU ARE THE NEW FAG OF THE YEAR!!!
>> [_] Anonymous 02/13/09(Fri)11:33 No.896225
>>896217
You're no better yourself, bro.
>> [_] Anonymous 02/13/09(Fri)11:44 No.896232
That giraffe makes some good points. I think I'll subscribe to his hews letter.
>> [_] omg it's a crazy Christian Fundie!! 02/13/09(Fri)11:44 No.896233
Macroevolution =/= Microevolution
I believe in Microevolution
But Macroevolution is too much of a leap of faith for me to take.
>> [_] Anonymous 02/13/09(Fri)12:22 No.896246
>>896044
>>896055
>>896061
>>896101
>>896107
>>896127
>>896136
>>896138
>>896156
>>896147
>>896179
>>896198
>>896201
>>896214
>>896217
>>896225
>>896232
>>896233
this thread is now about idiots.
really not a far stretch from the start, considering.
>> [_] Anonymous 02/13/09(Fri)12:31 No.896248
>>896233
So you believe a walk to the bathroom is possible, but walking to the mall is impossible?
Microevolution + Great deal of time = Macroevolution
>> [_] Anonymous 02/13/09(Fri)12:37 No.896252
SONE OFF VABITCH
FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF
>> [_] Anonymous 02/13/09(Fri)13:10 No.896264
>>896248
According to that idea, nearly every single species alive underwent extreme mutations and changes
over time. And somehow all these freaks of nature--no pun intended--all survived instead of the
others.
It doesn't make sense so assume every freak survived and almost none of the in-betweens did. For
instance half human half apes. Supposedly they're smarter and better able to adapt than regular
apes. Yet there are none. We still have apes and humans. If they're so much more suited for
survival why didn't they survive and apes die out? There should be at least some left.
Random mutations and evolution can only explain minor scale changes when you take the whole earth
into consideration. Even if one species changed drastically, they couldn't all have that much
luck. The earth would have to be a very small place for adaptations and changes to affect even
one entire species.
>> [_] Anonymous 02/13/09(Fri)13:29 No.896271
>>896264
Um. Because they weren't strong enough to compete with apes, and weren't smart enough to compete
with humans? That's kind of how natural selection works, you know. Species that aren't the most
specialized to any niche die off fairly rapidly.
There's plenty of places where small mutations can find niches of their own - the Galapagos
Finches are the best example, and the one that actually inspired Darwin.
>> [_] Anonymous 02/13/09(Fri)13:37 No.896276
>>896264
You speak with minimal knowledge about evolution.
Every species that exists is an inbetween state between one race and another. Fossilization is an
extremely rare event for anyone, and only happens in specific circumstances.
On the comment of humans evolving from apes, this is oversimplified. What humans evolved from
went extinct. The primate and ape species you see today evolved along side of us, and we all
share ancestors at some point or another.
Furthermore, evolution is about designing species through natural selection. For every successful
evolutions, there are likely an untold unsuccessful evolutions that stop within a few generations
or less, further preventing the possibility of finding fossilized specimens to study. As >>896271
stated, species die off swiftly as soon as a superior species comes along. You can see this in
action by introducing pigs and rats into habitats they do not originate from - the indigenous
species are driven to extinction.
>> [_] Anonymous 02/13/09(Fri)14:14 No.896290
26KB and a decent shitstorm.
Excellent.
>> [_] Anonymous 02/13/09(Fri)14:15 No.896291
>species die off swiftly as soon as a superior species comes along
Any "half" species" isn't as inferior as the one below it. Smart apes should still be around,
right? I can't see why they would all die off when they're still better able to survive. They
could form more complex social structures, or migrate to better food sources, or monopolize one,
or aggressively kill off the others (like we do). They seem to have every advantage. But there's
still dumb apes, to put it bluntly, and humans.
The other problem is the Galapagos finches, as mentioned. There can be small groups, but fans of
evolution often claim that it happened all over the world to nearly everything alive. It's too
much of a leap in my opinion at least for them all to be so radically altered and yet have none
of the middle class remain. We should see evidence everywhere of species that have changed and
become somewhat superior to another, if it happened so many times already.
>> [_] Anonymous 02/13/09(Fri)14:15 No.896294
>>896291 continued
An example may be us humans. There's so many kinds of us, with greater or poorer survivability
and intelligence. Animals should be somewhat similar. Some should be smart, and others not. If
apes can survive, smarts apes should be able to too.
I mean, to get away from all this seriousness, look at niggers and americans. Somehow they still
survive to this day.
>> [_] Anonymous 02/13/09(Fri)14:26 No.896299
>>896291
Evolution has no goal in mind. There's no such thing as an inferior species, only those more or
less suited to a particular niche. When times are good, there's lots of room for unsuitable
adaptations, and species thrive and multiply. Then an ice age comes, and the herds leave, and
people starve, and if you can't fight the apes for a cushy spot in the forest, and you can't keep
up with the humans on the plains, you're *fucked.* That's what happened to the apelike hominids.
>> [_] Anonymous 02/13/09(Fri)14:27 No.896300
>>It's too much of a leap in my opinion at least for them all to be so radically altered and yet
have none of the middle class remain. We should see evidence everywhere of species that have
changed and become somewhat superior to another, if it happened so many times already.
Your opinion isn't worth shit. Every species alive is so because it is the most motherfucking
badass example of its type, and have ground the competition into the dust. Your evidence of
inferior species is in the fossil record. It IS the fossil record. You're demanding proof without
knowing what the fuck you even want, and you're too happy with your ignorance to look for
yourself.
>> [_] Anonymous 02/13/09(Fri)14:40 No.896307
>>896091
The flood is a fakt.
It's also proofed by sience.
They also found the remainings of the arc btw.
And no, thats not a troll and I'm not an creationist.
