File[Ariel.swf] - (1.06 MB)
[_] [H] Anonymous 09/29/11(Thu)16:38 No.1565042
Marked for deletion (old).
>> [_] Anonymous 09/29/11(Thu)16:46 No.1565045
Need I say it? SAAAAAAAAAAAAUUUUCE!!! >.<
>> [_] Anonymous 09/29/11(Thu)16:52 No.1565047
Was ok at first, but was anyone else creeped the fuck out by her face at the end? It was staring
into my soul.
>> [_] Anonymous 09/29/11(Thu)17:03 No.1565048
Obviously traced, and of an ugly woman at that.
>> [_] Anonymous 09/29/11(Thu)17:05 No.1565049
MERMAIDS DON'T WORK THIS WAY
>> [_] Anonymous 09/29/11(Thu)17:18 No.1565053
>>1565049
I was also going to say that.
>> [_] Anonymous 09/29/11(Thu)17:22 No.1565055
Those tits are awful, that is not where nipples go, I can't fap to this.
>> [_] Anonymous 09/29/11(Thu)17:33 No.1565057
THAT. FUCKING. QUALITY.
>> [_] Anonymous 09/29/11(Thu)17:40 No.1565059
>>1565057
>/f/
>expecting video quality higher than mediocre
>2011
>> [_] Anonymous 09/29/11(Thu)18:40 No.1565081
>>1565057
protip:make the window smaller. the video is stretched as fuck.
that said, holy shit is this a quality bit of animation.
>> [_] Anonymous 09/29/11(Thu)21:13 No.1565106
Holy shit. There is no way I can look at The Little Mermaid the same way ever again... source?
>> [_] Anonymous 09/29/11(Thu)22:10 No.1565127
>>1565081
>> this a QUALITY bit of animation.
Fixed
>> [_] Anonymous 09/29/11(Thu)22:17 No.1565130
It's from cartoonvalley.com
>> [_] Anonymous 09/29/11(Thu)22:26 No.1565134
video quality was lower than I'd prefer.
But not that bad over all.
Would rather like to see a higher resolution version of this.
>> [_] Anonymous 09/29/11(Thu)22:29 No.1565136
yeah this is straight from the cartoon valley main page.
doubt anybody has full sauce
>> [_] Anonymous 09/29/11(Thu)22:33 No.1565138
>>1565055
I'm glad to note I wasn't the only one who noticed this.
>> [_] Anonymous 09/29/11(Thu)23:06 No.1565154
it's in shit quality because it's not supposed to be that fucking big
it's natural size is like 240x190
>> [_] Anonymous 09/30/11(Fri)01:07 No.1565209
mfw to be continued
>> [_] Anonymous 09/30/11(Fri)02:14 No.1565235
Ah the wonders of animation. You can make a vagina look awesome but you have to balance it with
ugly tits.
WHY CAN'T WE HAVE BOTH!?!?
>> [_] Anonymous 09/30/11(Fri)02:30 No.1565243
I can't find a siterip of Cartoon Valley that includes the videos newer than 2007.
>> [_] Anonymous 09/30/11(Fri)08:06 No.1565303
Actually, that's Ursula with red hair. Enjoy.
>> [_] Anonymous 09/30/11(Fri)08:11 No.1565305
>>1565243
svscomics.com/siterip/6402-cartoon-valley-full-repack.html
>> [_] Anonymous 09/30/11(Fri)08:23 No.1565307
inta-boner right there
>> [_] Anonymous 09/30/11(Fri)10:35 No.1565324
>>1565055
You're mostly seeing her boobs from the underneath, that's why they are so high up.
>> [_] Anonymous 09/30/11(Fri)11:15 No.1565326
>>1565235
Because they tried to make her tits much bigger than original.
morons think that add huge deformed tits makes things better.
>> [_] lol Anonymous 09/30/11(Fri)11:16 No.1565328
>>1565081
I never thought rotoscoping the shit out of a softcore flick qualifies as quality animation. Not
to mention the obvious loops that made the animation even more unnatural and lulzy.
