File[Ocean_Energy_-_Wave_Power_Station.swf] - (5.55 MB)
[_] [L] Anonymous 05/03/12(Thu)20:24 No.1670384
Marked for deletion (old).
>> [_] Anonymous 05/03/12(Thu)20:43 No.1670393
interesting. Can it withstand a tsunami or rising sea level though? How would you stop sediment
from building up around it? It never explicitly cites what energy one turbine can actually
generate either (although I'm sure that information I could find myself if I wanted)
>> [_] Anonymous 05/03/12(Thu)22:01 No.1670441
>>1670393
>Can it withstand a tsunami or rising sea level though?
Unless the sea level rises above the coastline, it shouldn't be a problem. It would most likely
not be put in a tsunami-vulnerable zone, and would probably have safety features to protect it.
>How would you stop sediment from building up around it?
Regular maintenance, like anything else.
>> [_] Anonymous 05/03/12(Thu)23:58 No.1670507
>claims to be able to produce up to 40% of the world's energy
>never gives a single number of actual power output
Yeah, sounds great. Wonder if they sell monorails too, I heard its the /wave/ of the future.
>> [_] Anonymous 05/04/12(Fri)01:04 No.1670536
interesting, thanks
>> [_] Anonymous 05/04/12(Fri)02:12 No.1670563
>>1670507
But they did. They said "if fully exploited," which means having these stations on every single
foot of coastline across the planet. IT IS A PARAGON OF EXCELLENCE.
>> [_] Anonymous 05/04/12(Fri)06:01 No.1670633
>>1670563
Whenever someone says "if fully exploited" I substitute that with "if someone else throws enough
of their money at it and doesn't mind waiting a while."
>> [_] Anonymous 05/04/12(Fri)10:18 No.1670704
i will fuck the parents of anyone who invests in this.
