File[The Big Question.swf] - (7.93 MB)
[_] [L] Anonymous 05/07/12(Mon)19:35 No.1673080
>> [_] Anonymous 05/07/12(Mon)19:48 No.1673083
Booooooooooring.
>> [_] Anonymous 05/07/12(Mon)21:42 No.1673184
My video cuts off about somewhere just before he introduces the opposite of "obsolescence." My
argument back is: what of it? All economies up to this point have included the traits (in red
text) in some form or another; the real difference is how honestly they approach those issues and
the nature of possession and transaction as understood by the system. You can't just wring them
out of existence as if human nature is a completely rational system that always falls towards the
closest source of gravity; most of the aforementioned exist simply because human nature is far
too irregular and individual, even when made as regular and collective as possible, to tolerate
that they don't have some personal measure of control over something, no matter how irrational it
is. It's why we get angry and why we feel happy.
