File[Where_it_is.swf] - (2.05 MB)
[_] [?] pure zen Anonymous 04/03/12(Tue)01:50 No.1648327
>> [_] Anonymous 04/03/12(Tue)02:02 No.1648333
my brain is full of fuck
>> [_] Anonymous 04/03/12(Tue)02:05 No.1648336
ummmm.... what?
>> [_] Anonymous 04/03/12(Tue)02:10 No.1648338
i understood...most...of that?
>> [_] Anonymous 04/03/12(Tue)02:11 No.1648340
Even if i swear there's an edit in the audio. It does make sense. Subtracting the location of the
missile and not make it go from point A to B and just tell it "be anywhere but here". It works
when you know the missile's program is both self corrective and working with signal guidance not
optical or laser.
SCIENCE!
>> [_] Anonymous 04/03/12(Tue)03:30 No.1648368
This is why I hated Navy sonar school... they explain shit in crazy circles instead of giving you
the straight poop. Rage.
>> [_] Anonymous 04/03/12(Tue)04:12 No.1648377
so it deviates from where it was to where it will be in the target. makes perfect sense. although
a simple laser guided system would work way better.
>> [_] Anonymous 04/03/12(Tue)04:15 No.1648379
Just imagine, soon we'll have missiles that can figure out where they wouldn't be by subtracting
where they cannot be from where they shouldn't have been. Or vice versa.
>> [_] Anonymous 04/03/12(Tue)04:18 No.1648380
>>1648379
so subtracting the area of the target from where they shouldn't be would give them the direction
of where they will be in the future.
or simply square the equation would give them the trajectory of where they should be.
