File: phpGc.swf-(279 KB, Loop)
[_] zeitgeist isn't a cult Anonymous 03/19/13(Tue)23:42 No.1919249
>> [_] Anonymous 03/19/13(Tue)23:44 No.1919250
Nice online proxy there OP.
>> [_] Anonymous 03/19/13(Tue)23:49 No.1919257
>>1919250
thanks anonymous :)
>> [_] Anonymous 03/19/13(Tue)23:56 No.1919265
>zeitgeist isn't a cult
No, it's spam.
Post your pdf, have your discussion/shitstorm, but don't flood the board.
>> [_] Anonymous 03/20/13(Wed)00:00 No.1919269
>>1919265
spam
1.Unwanted e-mail (usually of a commercial nature sent out in bulk)
2. Send unwanted or junk e-mail
I've never seen any evidence provided that zeitgeist is junk or "spam". Not in /q/ not in /f/.
Only the claim that it is.
relating to one, how is it commercial?
relating to two, how is it junk?
>> [_] Anonymous 03/20/13(Wed)00:07 No.1919273
>>1919269
It turns into spam when there are at least 7 different zeitgeist flashes on the front page at
once, which there is now and there was at least a year ago. Take a hint.
>> [_] Anonymous 03/20/13(Wed)00:07 No.1919274
>>1919269
eat shit and die
>> [_] Anonymous 03/20/13(Wed)00:11 No.1919279
>>1919269
Don't play semantics and cherry pick words. You know what I meant.
Btw, spam:
(to) Send the same message indiscriminately to (large numbers of recipients) on the Internet.
>> [_] Anonymous 03/20/13(Wed)00:11 No.1919280
>>1919273
this is exactly like /q/.
heated talk is not an explanation here's the two questions that define "spam" again:
how is it commercial?
how is it junk?
>>1919274
religious talk, next you'll be threatening me with hell and the devil.
>> [_] Anonymous 03/20/13(Wed)00:15 No.1919283
>>1919279
well you're "cherry picking" words now as you want to avoid how spam in defined in the dictionary
I have.
Again:
how is it commercial?
how is it junk?
there are dozens of flash moves that appear as the "same message" over and over on /f/ yet aren't
labelled as "spam" when zeitgeist appears after months of not showing up at all.
>> [_] Anonymous 03/20/13(Wed)00:16 No.1919285
>>1919280
You're ignoring your own definition of spam, defining it as "unwanted". I believe that the vast
majority of /f/ who cares about the board doesn't want Zeitgeist crap. And referring to it as
junk? I'm not giving Zeitgeist special treatment, I'm doing exactly what I did the last time
around: complaining about it until someone does something about it.
>> [_] Anonymous 03/20/13(Wed)00:20 No.1919287
>>1919283
Dude, fuck your dictionary. There's this thing called the internet, you can look up definitions
and porn on it.
https://www.google.com/search?q=spam+definition
http://www.pornhub.com/
>> [_] zeitgeist is scientology Anonymous 03/20/13(Wed)00:20 No.1919288
>>1919285
zeitgeist here: just because something is unwanted doesn't make it "spam" as "spam" needs to be
"junk and or commercial in nature".
>> [_] Anonymous 03/20/13(Wed)00:21 No.1919290
>>1919288
Are you going by that dictionary definition again? Pray tell, which dictionary would this be?
>> [_] Anonymous 03/20/13(Wed)00:25 No.1919293
>>1919290
Actually, let me quote my dictionary from the internet:
Spam
Spam
[spam] Show IPA noun, verb, spammed, spam·ming.
1.
Trademark. a canned food product consisting especially of pork formed into a solid block.
noun
2.
( lowercase ) disruptive messages, especially commercial messages posted on a computer network or
sent as e-mail.
>Note the words "disruptive messages"
>> [_] Anonymous 03/20/13(Wed)00:26 No.1919294
>>1919290
WORDWEB an offline dictionary:
spam
1.Unwanted e-mail (usually of a commercial nature sent out in bulk)
2. Send unwanted or junk e-mail
dictionary I use doesn't exactly matter, if you could actually see past your rage you could see
that anonymous is hiding behind these labels: shit, cult, dumb, spam and so forth.
Where's the critical explanation to justify these labels against zeitgeist just because it's
hated? NO WHERE TO BE SEEN.
>> [_] Anonymous 03/20/13(Wed)00:31 No.1919297
>>1919294
Ahh, the ever-changing colloquial nature of words.
Arguing a dictionary definition is retarded.
Retarded like a dumb shit cult that spams and so forth. (Take that!).
To everyone else: stop feeding the troll.
>> [_] Anonymous 03/20/13(Wed)00:33 No.1919299
http://www.nambla.org/zeitgeist.html
Get out of here you pedophile
>> [_] zeitgeist is scientology Anonymous 03/20/13(Wed)00:35 No.1919301
>>1919297
thanks for proving my point.
when it comes to actual hard evidence against why zeitgeist is bad with all the other negative
lables you want to attach to it, there is none.
No one put any effort into an actual critical argument against zeitgeist when there was the
thread on /q/ it was simply:
Save us Moot! zeitgeist is spamming us!
and like daddy, moot saved you.
>> [_] zeitgeist is scientology Anonymous 03/20/13(Wed)00:38 No.1919306
>>1919299
actually our website is:
thezeitgeistmovement.com
>> [_] Anonymous 03/20/13(Wed)00:53 No.1919325
>>1919306
this fag is clearly asking for a dick in his butt and a fine dose of DDOS to his site
>> [_] sage zeitgeist is scientology 03/20/13(Wed)01:07 No.1919335
>>1919325
mommy! anonymous is threatening my zeitgeist cult through the internet!
