File: breivik_watches_k-on.swf-(1.6 MB, Anime)
[_] Anonymous 03/12/13(Tue)09:58 No.1911626
Marked for deletion (old).
>> [_] Anonymous 03/12/13(Tue)10:25 No.1911637
tfw
>> [_] Anonymous 03/12/13(Tue)10:33 No.1911638
impossibru 4chan is funny again
>> [_] Anonymous 03/12/13(Tue)10:38 No.1911640
Who is this brevik guy and why am I laughing?
>> [_] Anonymous 03/12/13(Tue)11:39 No.1911670
>>1911640
A man who was far ahead of his time. In a few years we'll be regarding him as a hero
>> [_] Anonymous 03/12/13(Tue)11:41 No.1911672
>>1911640
he shot a bunch of kids
>>1911670
stormfags plz go
>> [_] Anonymous 03/12/13(Tue)11:47 No.1911677
>>1911672
ah, good to know.
>> [_] Anonymous 03/12/13(Tue)11:48 No.1911680
>>1911672
>he shot a bunch of kids
No, he shot a bunch of terrorists in training that were being taught to succumb to foreign races
for no good reason
>> [_] Anonymous 03/12/13(Tue)13:09 No.1911741
>>1911680 see >>1911672
>> [_] Anonymous 03/12/13(Tue)13:16 No.1911744
>>1911741
>see the post you just replied to
Bwahaha
>> [_] Anonymous 03/12/13(Tue)13:31 No.1911759
damn dude anders got a big ass head
>> [_] Anonymous 03/12/13(Tue)13:42 No.1911771
>>1911672
He shot his own people... not the ones he was angry at.
It all boils down to him being a perfect norweigian that attempts to address a problem by making
a new one.
>> [_] Anonymous 03/12/13(Tue)14:29 No.1911802
>>1911771
>his own people
>implying breivik has an army
Just like how the polish stopped the turks in 1672/1676 from invading all of europe, breivik's
actions were just as heroic, if not more so as he acted alone instead of with an army.
>> [_] Anonymous 03/12/13(Tue)14:34 No.1911805
>>1911802
>clarification obviously needed....
*His own countrymen.*
Not a single one of those he shot was an immigrant.
A hero?
HAH!
He's a fucking loser and a norweigian to boot, which makes him the biggest failure on this earth
after the copycat pedo Muhammed.
>> [_] Anonymous 03/12/13(Tue)14:39 No.1911809
>Breivik killed youth of Labour Party (Arbeiderpartiet)
>Hitler's party was labour/worker party (Arbeiterpartei)
Isn't it obvious that Breivik was a good guy who wanted to save a world from the next Hitler
after all?
>> [_] Anonymous 03/12/13(Tue)14:46 No.1911818
>>1911809
Hitler was elitist socialist, Norway's version is probably neo-liberal socialist.
>> [_] Anonymous 03/12/13(Tue)14:55 No.1911829
>>1911818
you are so stupid it hurts
>> [_] Anonymous 03/12/13(Tue)14:59 No.1911832
>>1911829
Okay.
>> [_] Anonymous 03/12/13(Tue)15:45 No.1911874
Just some guy who would have been out after 2 years of therapy if it wasnt for the fact the the
people he killed was politicians kids. Norway=corrupt as fuck.
>> [_] Anonymous 03/12/13(Tue)15:47 No.1911877
>>1911874
>Norway
>corrupt
Do you even 'murrika?
>> [_] Anonymous 03/12/13(Tue)16:29 No.1911925
>>1911874
But Norway is honest as fuck!
If it was some other country, he wouldn't even be close to some politican elite kids. And even
after that he would probably be raped by that political elite, not sent to 21 year vacation in a
nice hotel with internet.
>> [_] Anonymous 03/12/13(Tue)16:30 No.1911926
>>1911809
>>1911818
National Socialism is about as socialist as DPRK is democratic. Ya dun goofed.
>> [_] Anonymous 03/12/13(Tue)16:34 No.1911928
>>1911926
But both of them are socialist and about labour! They even have the same name!
This is not just a coincidence!
>> [_] Anonymous 03/12/13(Tue)16:40 No.1911937
>>1911928
>can't tell if sarcastic or..
>> [_] Anonymous 03/12/13(Tue)16:52 No.1911949
The Nazis were following the economics of Fascism. Nationalized industry with elements of
corporatism and syndicalism. While traditional socialism pursues a classless society, the
National Socialist party was very class- and race-oriented, and pursued a national identity above
all. They were nearly polar opposites in their goals.
Let's not forget the saying
>First they came for the communists,
>and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a communist.
>Then they came for the socialists,
>Then they came for the trade unionists,
That's very pro-labour of them, right?
>> [_] Anonymous 03/12/13(Tue)16:53 No.1911952
>>1911937
nah, I was joking
After all NSDAP were nationalist, anti-marxist, totalitarian and far-right and Norway's party is
internationalist, kinda ok with marxism, liberal and centrist-left
>> [_] Anonymous 03/12/13(Tue)16:57 No.1911954
>>1911952
Damn, I need to get my sarcasm detectors fixed.
>> [_] Anonymous 03/12/13(Tue)16:57 No.1911955
>>1911926
And how did 1818 dun goof?
>> [_] Anonymous 03/12/13(Tue)17:00 No.1911959
>>1911802
Why would it have been bad if the turks had conquered europe?
>> [_] Anonymous 03/12/13(Tue)17:04 No.1911964
>>1911959
but they already did
>> [_] Anonymous 03/12/13(Tue)17:07 No.1911968
>>1911964
No, since there are still people like breivik, they didn't succeed! We need more turks so less
people would kill people!
>> [_] Anonymous 03/12/13(Tue)17:11 No.1911972
>>1911968
But there would be much more deaths from kebab intoxication.
It would be like kebab holocaust.
>> [_] Anonymous 03/12/13(Tue)17:13 No.1911975
>>1911972
After that, there wouldn't be any deaths afterward. All whites would be removed and one race
survived
