File: nawnco.swf-(84 KB, Game)
[_] Beat my 1 round record Anonymous 05/29/13(Wed)18:54 No.1987178
I dare you tu beat my 1 round record
Marked for deletion (old).
>> [_] Anonymous 05/29/13(Wed)19:00 No.1987186
what are you supposed to do?
>> [_] Anonymous 05/29/13(Wed)19:01 No.1987187
>>1987186
Compress data
Fiddle a bit with it and you'll get how things work
>> [_] Anonymous 05/29/13(Wed)19:07 No.1987193
I don't get it
>> [_] Anonymous 05/29/13(Wed)19:09 No.1987195
>>1987187
And what does that mean?
You can literally just mash crap and it never does anything. I thought it was like those games of
matching blocks by what's connected or at least by 3s and 4s, but that's not doing anything.
>> [_] Anonymous 05/29/13(Wed)19:09 No.1987196
>>1987193
One tip:
It does not matter what symbol is on each square on the "data to analyze" field. Pay attention to
the constructed vocabulary part
>> [_] Anonymous 05/29/13(Wed)19:10 No.1987198
>>1987195
see
>>1987196
>> [_] Anonymous 05/29/13(Wed)19:10 No.1987202
C'mon guys, the fun part is to get what you're supposed to do
>> [_] Anonymous 05/29/13(Wed)19:11 No.1987203
>>1987202
Thatsnotfun.jpg
>> [_] Anonymous 05/29/13(Wed)19:11 No.1987204
>>1987196
I personally don't understand what that mean. And it seems like I'm not the only one.
>> [_] Anonymous 05/29/13(Wed)19:12 No.1987206
>>1987204
Tip 2:
Try to keep your vocabulary as simple as possible each time the board is rebuild
>> [_] Anonymous 05/29/13(Wed)19:13 No.1987207
>>1987206
rebuilt*
>> [_] Anonymous 05/29/13(Wed)19:13 No.1987208
i dont get it. i guess all of you that do just have fun. vocabulary part?
>> [_] Anonymous 05/29/13(Wed)19:14 No.1987211
>>1987206
May I ask what does "vocabulary" mean for this game?
>> [_] Anonymous 05/29/13(Wed)19:15 No.1987212
>>1987211
The number of possible 4-tile combinations. Each one of them is a "word" on this vocabulary.
Whenever you click the grid, you make a "word"
>> [_] Anonymous 05/29/13(Wed)19:16 No.1987213
I get it... hmm is the goal to compress everything into one in a round? Difficult...
>> [_] Anonymous 05/29/13(Wed)19:18 No.1987216
Done.
Still a fun game.
>> [_] Anonymous 05/29/13(Wed)19:18 No.1987219
>>1987216
Now try to do it on a single round :v
>> [_] Anonymous 05/29/13(Wed)19:19 No.1987220
I give up understanding this game. The rest of you have fun.
>> [_] Anonymous 05/29/13(Wed)19:22 No.1987222
Okay So I'm gonna write instructions for everyone here.
Lines connecting under constructed vocabulary means that the tiles were THE SAME. So a triangle
with a hypotenuse going from bottom left to top right means the bottom left, top left, and top
right symbols were the same. Same goes for lines up and down on the right or left side, sideways,
or all 4 of the same symbol (a box with an x in the middle).
Dots mean individual symbols not connected to anything.
The goal is to get all of the symbols to match with ONE PATTERN formed in constructed vocabulary.
This is where the game offers you choice, and it becomes easier the less constructed vocabulary
you have made per round.
>> [_] Anonymous 05/29/13(Wed)19:23 No.1987225
>>1987219
Single round was easy for me
>> [_] Anonymous 05/29/13(Wed)19:24 No.1987226
>>1987222
You spoiling bastard!
>> [_] Anonymous 05/29/13(Wed)19:24 No.1987229
>>1987225
Not difficult tbh
I wanted to see how people would react when having to learn what to do
>> [_] Anonymous 05/29/13(Wed)19:27 No.1987230
The easiest way to finish it in one round is to choose 1line/2dots patterns I guess
>> [_] Anonymous 05/29/13(Wed)19:47 No.1987245
>vocabulary
>data
>random lines and dots
? ? ? ?? ? ? ?? ??? ??
nope.avi
>> [_] Anonymous 05/29/13(Wed)19:55 No.1987255
No instructions
No end goal
No feedback on good/bad moves
Bad game is bad
>> [_] Anonymous 05/29/13(Wed)19:57 No.1987257
>>1987255
I beat it and had fun
Maybe you're just mad because you're dumb
>> [_] Anonymous 05/29/13(Wed)19:57 No.1987258
>>1987229
You did a fucking piss poor job of describing it, because that's not how compression works.
>> [_] Anonymous 05/29/13(Wed)19:57 No.1987259
The only thing I see is that when you pick blocks of the same color, they connect somehow in the
"vocabulary". But I don't know what the point of this is, and I don't know why some combinations
don't show up at all.
What the fuck is the Vocabulary anyway? Is this some sort of proto-machine language?
>> [_] Anonymous 05/29/13(Wed)20:02 No.1987265
>>1987258
Well, that's how compression works in this game
>> [_] Anonymous 05/29/13(Wed)20:02 No.1987267
Is this some sort of RAR visual compression algorithm?
>> [_] Anonymous 05/29/13(Wed)20:02 No.1987269
WHAT DOO I DOOOOO
>> [_] Anonymous 05/29/13(Wed)20:03 No.1987270
>>1987255
Now every game has to give it all chewed?
Oh, yep, true. Totally forgot about that..
Sorry...
>> [_] Anonymous 05/29/13(Wed)20:04 No.1987274
MFW people have no comprehensive ability, when I picked up on it on the first round
Basically, for the lazy:
Clicking on tile sets will add that to your vocabulary, based on matching tiles
Try to complete a round using only one tile-set
ie: finishing a round using only groups of 4 where, say, the top two tiles match, and the bottom
two are different from the rest (represented by a horizontal line over two dots, because
vocabulary matches the two and forms a line, the others do not match and are represented by
individual dots)
What people mean is that the vocabulary is not specific to certain tiles - a set of 4 green tiles
is the same as a set of 4 blue tiles, since they both form the same diagram
>> [_] Anonymous 05/29/13(Wed)20:06 No.1987275
>>1987274
>telling them how to play
That's like spoiling a movie man
You would delete your post if you really cared
>> [_] Anonymous 05/29/13(Wed)20:08 No.1987277
>>1987274
Yeah, right? I thought people would like the challenge, but it seems that they don't even see the
challenge - just some random collors and lines
But the guy has a point - >>1987275
For the ones wo are really interested, learning is the fun part, so you shouldn't spoil the fun
>> [_] Anonymous 05/29/13(Wed)20:10 No.1987279
>>1987270
>Now every game has to give it all chewed?
>Oh, yep, true. Totally forgot about that..
Other games pull this off just fine without throwing shit in your face like a baby. You press a
button, you see a response on the screen (movement, jumping). You associate button presses with
this response in the future. It's feedback the player uses in the future to become better at the
game.
You could even use a sound to indicate a good or a bad move. Or even to just indicate that the
board is resetting after you use up all your moves (which is what I assume they are).
When I click a box with 3 of the same block, and see a vocabulary with 3 lines, this is a
positive feedback to the player. When I click another similar combination, and that doesn't
appear as a vocabulary, it is a negative feedback. Why did this one not work when the first did?
It creates confusion.
>> [_] Anonymous 05/29/13(Wed)20:13 No.1987284
>>1987279
There's no good and bad vocabulary. The feedback about good and bad comes after you finish some
8-move rounds. The point is to keep it simple, it does not matter what words you use, but how
many of them.
The learning curve here is just different from the norm, and there's people who appreciate it.
>> [_] Anonymous 05/29/13(Wed)20:14 No.1987286
>>1987275
>>1987277
I know, but it was already explained, so I tried to make it more child-friendly
I was hoping, that by discovering how it worked, it would help them be more observant in the
future
Otherwise, they would play it, not understand it, check the comments for a solution, not find
one, leave a hateful comment due to their own stupidity, and leave... end of story, nothing
accomplished
at least this way they can hate with some understanding of what they are hating in the first place
>> [_] Anonymous 05/29/13(Wed)20:15 No.1987288
>>1987286
There's a point
>> [_] Anonymous 05/29/13(Wed)20:17 No.1987290
>>1987267
LELELELELELELE
>> [_] Anonymous 05/29/13(Wed)20:19 No.1987294
>>1987279
That's because you have completely misunderstood the entire goal of the game - which is to
minimize your vocabulary, you win when you complete a round with only one pattern
If you had understood this, then after the appearance of the first pattern, the lack of
additional vocabulary IS the positive feedback, rather than negative as you have misinterpreted.
>> [_] Anonymous 05/29/13(Wed)20:20 No.1987295
>see interesting challenge on /f/
>open game
>wtf is this
>don't know if i'm winning or losing
>close game
>move on with life
>> [_] Anonymous 05/29/13(Wed)20:21 No.1987297
>>1987295
day in the life of a tool
>> [_] Anonymous 05/29/13(Wed)20:21 No.1987298
So I take it there's no win animation, it just keeps repeating?
>> [_] Anonymous 05/29/13(Wed)20:22 No.1987300
>>1987298
There is a win animation. You probably didn't win
>> [_] Anonymous 05/29/13(Wed)20:25 No.1987304
>>1987294
Constructing vocabulary in this context appears as a goal of the game. Clearly you intended for
it to be the opposite, since you win by using the smallest vocabulary.
This is what I meant by feedback. The game isn't a bad game, quite the opposite. But you trick
players into thinking they need to do one thing, when in fact you win by doing the opposite.
It's like if you played GTA and when you go to the end of the game, you were thrown in prison and
executed for all the people you killed, and then telling the player that "lol, you weren't
supposed to be a bad person!"
>> [_] Anonymous 05/29/13(Wed)20:27 No.1987305
>>1987300
Huh. You can't repeat symbols on the right, yeah? I guess you have to use all the same blocks on
the left to construct the symbols on the right?
>> [_] Anonymous 05/29/13(Wed)20:28 No.1987307
>>1987305
rather the opposite
>> [_] Anonymous 05/29/13(Wed)20:30 No.1987310
>>1987304
But there's a moment when you get that it won't lead to anything - that's the point on your life
when you have to decide between hating on the game or keep playing until you get the real purpose
Actually, if the game was only about doing what you should to win, it would be no fun at all. The
fun part is cracking the methods and actually getting to a point where you win, disregarding all
process inbetween
>> [_] Anonymous 05/29/13(Wed)20:30 No.1987312
Fill your constructed vocab in your first round with as much as you can, then second round get 4
dots. That was the easiest method
>> [_] Anonymous 05/29/13(Wed)20:31 No.1987315
i understand it now but the game itself is rather unintuitive. the symbols are misleading because
they coincide with the patterns you could form yet the image itself has no meaning. it's more
logical to assume that the images on both sides would correlate with each other and i wouldn't
blame anyone for being tricked from following that line of reasoning.
>> [_] Anonymous 05/29/13(Wed)20:32 No.1987316
>>1987312
But that takes 2 rounds
>> [_] Anonymous 05/29/13(Wed)20:36 No.1987318
>>1987315
also, bragging about winning on the 1st round is ridiculous because for a game based on "logic",
it's not always possible to win on the first round. that's like bragging about winning a game of
solitaire on your first try (3 draw).
>> [_] Anonymous 05/29/13(Wed)20:38 No.1987319
>>1987316
For 1 round then everything has to line up and drop into place just right, on your first panel.
So it's down to mainly luck
>> [_] Anonymous 05/29/13(Wed)20:38 No.1987320
>>1987318
There's a bit of skill into it when it comes to perceiving what pattern will be the most common
given your choices
>> [_] Anonymous 05/29/13(Wed)20:39 No.1987322
You know what, I'm done being angry at this game
Congrats OP, you have created one of the only threads on /f/ to get this many posts. I'm sure
this was your intention the whole time.
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
>> [_] Anonymous 05/29/13(Wed)20:39 No.1987323
>>1987320
of course, there's strategies to increase your winning odds, but like solitaire it's impossible
to know what's coming next.
>> [_] Anonymous 05/29/13(Wed)20:40 No.1987327
>>1987322
I'm glad that people, even the hating ones, are still willing to engage in a discussion about
gaming, it's objectives, logic and much more
>> [_] Anonymous 05/29/13(Wed)20:42 No.1987329
>>1987323
So if you have the skill, you should be able to master it after a few tries, getting 1 or 2
rounds every time
>> [_] Anonymous 05/29/13(Wed)20:43 No.1987331
Guys I'm not the dev, I should credit him since there's is people reffering to me as if I was.
http://www.increpare.com/
>> [_] Anonymous 05/29/13(Wed)20:44 No.1987332
>>1987329
possibly, if anyone dares to care enough about this game.
>> [_] Anonymous 05/29/13(Wed)20:45 No.1987333
>>1987332
lel idc
>> [_] Anonymous 05/29/13(Wed)20:46 No.1987335
>>1987329
If you fill the construed vocab on the first round, there is a good chance of winning on round
two, by just getting 4 dots as your constructed.
That's the only way i can seem to win in 2 rounds
>> [_] Anonymous 05/29/13(Wed)20:47 No.1987337
OK, that ending animation was right on par with beating 1942.
At least it was grammatically correct.
>> [_] Anonymous 05/29/13(Wed)20:48 No.1987339
>>1987337
And then I beat it in a single round. Huh.
>> [_] Anonymous 05/29/13(Wed)20:50 No.1987341
Replace vocabulary with "stack" or something to make it less confusing
>> [_] Anonymous 05/29/13(Wed)20:53 No.1987345
>>1987341
>>1987315
>>1987304
>>1987279
SEE
>>1987331
>> [_] Anonymous 05/29/13(Wed)20:54 No.1987346
I DID IT IN 1 ROUND MOTHERFUCKERS AHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHA
HAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAH
AHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAH
AHAHAHHAHAHAHAHH
AHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHA
HAHAHHAHAHAHAHHA
HAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAH
AHAHHAHAHAHAHHAH
AHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA
HAHHAHAHAHAHHAHA
HAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAH
AHHAHAHAHAHHAHAH
AHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAH
>> [_] Anonymous 05/29/13(Wed)20:55 No.1987348
i understood it by round 12ish
>> [_] Anonymous 05/29/13(Wed)20:57 No.1987350
70th post
>> [_] Anonymous 05/29/13(Wed)20:58 No.1987352
>>1987350
Why so manny replies
>> [_] Anonymous 05/29/13(Wed)21:00 No.1987355
>>1987337
I could say that it was as succesfull as Mister T in the way it exists in the same universe
>> [_] Anonymous 05/29/13(Wed)21:01 No.1987357
>>1987355
I don't get the reference
>> [_] Anonymous 05/29/13(Wed)21:04 No.1987361
>>1987352
No troll H neither shitty newgrounds game
>> [_] Anonymous 05/29/13(Wed)21:04 No.1987363
IT'S WORKING! Not sure how many rounds I took (many), but this newspeak is looking good.
>> [_] Anonymous 05/29/13(Wed)21:05 No.1987365
>>1987332
okay, so after attempting it for about 20 rounds, 5 of them were won on the 1st round by looking
for the most likely 2-1-1 pattern, scanning for and clearing the squares from top to bottom.
>> [_] Anonymous 05/29/13(Wed)21:07 No.1987367
>>1987361
>>1987352
It actually offers a challenge
>> [_] Anonymous 05/29/13(Wed)21:12 No.1987375
>>1987363
Haha! Got it at the end of the second round. I won't bother the first. 2hard4me.
>> [_] Anonymous 05/29/13(Wed)21:18 No.1987384
>Marked for deletion (old).
And there goes the big thread. From dust to dust they say
>> [_] Anonymous 05/29/13(Wed)21:18 No.1987385
This seems like something from Ender's Game
>> [_] Anonymous 05/29/13(Wed)21:19 No.1987388
EVERYONE
Don't forget to czeck:
>>1987331
>> [_] Anonymous 05/29/13(Wed)21:23 No.1987390
MONKEYS!
>> [_] Anonymous 05/29/13(Wed)21:26 No.1987391
>>1987384
nigger
>> [_] Anonymous 05/29/13(Wed)21:27 No.1987392
>>1987391
n
