File :[oiligarchy.swf] - (2.45 MB)
[_] [G] Anonymous 05/26/09(Tue)03:24 No.

Marked for deletion (old).

>> [_] Anonymous 05/26/09(Tue)04:03 No.

  This makes me feel dirty.

>> [_] The Laziest Troll 05/26/09(Tue)04:57 No.

  Ugh, eventually you stop caring.

>> [_] Anonymous 05/26/09(Tue)05:21 No.

  how do i play

>> [_] Anonymous 05/26/09(Tue)06:19 No.

  So basically, my shareholders are happy when I have tons of production versus demand and the
  price of oil is low, so I make hardly any money.

  They get unhappier when demand outstrips supply and the price goes through the roof, causing me
  to make gazillions of dollars.

>> [_] Anonymous 05/26/09(Tue)07:25 No.

  Burning Lazy Persons.

>> [_] Anonymous 05/26/09(Tue)07:27 No.

  >>987786
  Its simple, engineer an oil crisis and then burn people.

>> [_] Anonymous 05/26/09(Tue)08:11 No.

  This game is awesome.

>> [_] Anonymous 05/26/09(Tue)08:36 No.

  I think I just caused the Apocalypse. Not shocking, I think the game said I was the only group
  with money by the end.

>> [_] Anonymous 05/26/09(Tue)09:43 No.

  I caused global nuclear war over oil rights. I feel evil.

>> [_] Anonymous 05/26/09(Tue)09:50 No.

  I lasted well into the 21st century despite my over production and (non-manufactured) oil crisis.

  After the hippies had taken over Washington, I converted all of my plants to human oil
  reclamation plants (?) which shot my production through the roof, but I couldn't bring demand
  back up in time for a retirement ending.

>> [_] Anonymous 05/26/09(Tue)10:17 No.

  I kind of assumed you would always cause nuclear war and that was the point (along with the other
  ridiculous things such as human oil and the news events).

>> [_] Anonymous 05/26/09(Tue)11:10 No.

  the problem is you can't get past ~2170 because you cause the death to happen.

  always with the MAD always.

>> [_] Anonymous 05/26/09(Tue)11:14 No.

  I stopped caring before reaching 2100. I assumed that the game never ended since it stopped being
  a challenge long before I stopped.

>> [_] Anonymous 05/26/09(Tue)11:26 No.

  I managed to get well into the 23rd century by maximizing my land usage for the human burners and
  not overproducing too much on the early drilling periods.

>> [_] Anonymous 05/26/09(Tue)11:57 No.

  I'm such a monster...

>> [_] Anonymous 05/26/09(Tue)12:30 No.

  I had every piece of land covered in human burners, gazillion of mercenaries/soldiers, the
  parties exchanging places every election year and me having control of them. Then I got the nuke
  ending.

  Unless there is some non-fail special ending, easy game is easy.

>> [_] Oblivion W. Guns !IPiPBOY0m2 05/26/09(Tue)12:31 No.

  This is so biased and, not surprisingly, inaccurate:

  It costs the same amount to drill offshore as it does anywhere else.

  BIASED ONE SIDED OPINIONS DON'T FACT-CHECK?! I'M SURPRISED!

>> [_] Anonymous 05/26/09(Tue)12:33 No.

  I missed the fact that you could bribe the government the first time, resulting in loss ~2040,
  saying something like "You enjoy your retirement, as new better energy sources emerges"

  I fail :D

>> [_] Anonymous 05/26/09(Tue)14:02 No.

  I like how Baghdad has a statue of Saddam Husein in 1947

>> [_] Anonymous 05/26/09(Tue)14:13 No.

  >>987952

  It costs a lot more to drill off shore.

>> [_] Anonymous 05/26/09(Tue)14:21 No.

  Pretty much true for how big American companies behave and how the government constantly sucks on
  their cocks for cash.

>> [_] Anonymous 05/26/09(Tue)14:45 No.

  Too easy...made too much money...

>> [_] Anonymous 05/26/09(Tue)15:19 No.

  >>988047
  nvm

>> [_] Anonymous 05/26/09(Tue)15:24 No.

  >>988049
  faggot

>> [_] Anonymous 05/26/09(Tue)15:42 No.

  I beat it, killed the world