File: Do The Evolution.swf-(7.85 MB, 320x240, Loop)
[_] Anonymous 02/03/14(Mon)00:13 No.2277770
totally not [H]
>> [_] Anonymous 02/03/14(Mon)00:35 No.2277803
Sauce?
The girl was doing things to my dick.
>> [_] Anonymous 02/03/14(Mon)00:37 No.2277807
>>2277803
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aDaOgu2CQtI
Oh, fuck me.
>> [_] Anonymous 02/03/14(Mon)00:43 No.2277820
War goes on.
Still a hierarchy, ruling class, caste system.
Average work hours increasing.
Still greedy, still corrupt.
Tragedy of the commons.
Still have to operate on the same game theory as ever.
I'm so tired of building fences. I'll just kill my neighbor's sheep. Or my neighbor.
>> [_] lo'man !!LfnATctioHj 02/03/14(Mon)00:49 No.2277826
>>2277820
If you kill the whole family you get all the sheep and land they haz too.
Though honestly, everyone talks about how ruling caste system is bad but no one will volunteer to
be on the absolute bottom and stay there.
Nor will they deny themselves the 'free' resources offered by those that cannot defend them.
The evolution of warfare has actually done more to save lives than destroy them. Hell nuclear
weapons are the only reason why there is a difference between the united states and the former
CCCP.
Game theory is natural. if you want to stop operating on it, you and your neighbor have to become
linked machines. Have fun being borg.
>> [_] Anonymous 02/03/14(Mon)01:00 No.2277844
>>2277826
The desperate desire to have more, regardless of what we have, need, or are content with, has
plagued and will continue to plague man. It holds us back as a whole, and causes waste on a scale
beyond comprehension.
Case-by-case, you can find plenty of examples of folk who don't take shit because they simply
don't need it. It's just not the rule. My paycheck is more than I need and I'm the crazy one for
not looking for ways to burn it.
To be fair, modern ambassadors and negotiators have taken advantage of today's "smaller" world
and war is looked down on by more than just the UN. Bloodshed is still considered a viable
option, it's just not so national.
>> [_] Anonymous 02/03/14(Mon)01:25 No.2277882
>>2277844
>The desperate desire to have more, regardless of what we have, need, or are content with, has
plagued and will continue to plague man. It holds us back as a whole, and causes waste on a scale
beyond comprehension.
no offensive but this is absolute opposite to truth
>To be fair, modern ambassadors and negotiators have taken advantage of today's "smaller" world
and war is looked down on by more than just the UN. Bloodshed is still considered a viable
option, it's just not so national.
yes and its always will be, honestly there is plenty philosophy about meaning of war, you should
read it
>> [_] Anonymous 02/03/14(Mon)01:37 No.2277900
>>2277882
Does costly corporate maneuvering for the sake of increasing market share somehow improves the
intrinsic value of a product/service?
It's especially futile when your competitor applies an equal and opposite force, negating both.
Battlegrounds include advertising, litigation, patent blocking...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Megatons_to_Megawatts_Program
This is really just a cute gesture. While I indulge in some hope for less wasteful
manhours/resources someday, I reckon everyone is always going to need a gun aimed at the other
guy.
MAYBE we'll work out a politically-neutral doomsday in orbit, like scifi imagines sometimes, but
it seems too fallible and the concept too imprecise to predict.
