File: Potato Knishes Max Quality.swf-(9.73 MB, 1056x576, Other)
[_] Anonymous 06/07/14(Sat)23:22 No.2409512
>> [_] Anonymous 06/08/14(Sun)00:13 No.2409560
>>2409512
"Max Quality" has a very academic meaning here.
>> [_] Anonymous 06/08/14(Sun)01:58 No.2409664
>>2409512
>Sorenson H.263
Sorry, not maximum quality. You could squeeze more out of this at the same filesize and
resolution using a proper two-pass vp6 process. Adobe Media Encoder under Flash Pro or
(preferably) vp6vfw.dll with mencoder would do it. However, at just over 2000 frames and with the
customary 10240 kB upper bound, the difference might be marginal. H.264 could probably reach
transparency under these conditions, but if you have a process to embed that in a swf, you're a
wizard or a slider from an alternate universe.
Overall I'm just opposed to the use of terms like "max quality." Unless your product is fully
vectorized while being lossless at native res, it's not "max quality." In only one case have I
ever even felt justified in promoting a quality-improvement of mine to be more than merely "HQ"
(and in that case with one or two small exceptions the quality of the product is actually the
highest possible quality rendition without redrawing every frame from scratch).
