File: blue.swf-(7.24 MB, 320x240, Other)
[_] blue Anonymous 08/25/14(Mon)11:19 No.2501990
>> [_] Anonymous 08/25/14(Mon)11:24 No.2501996
ayy
>> [_] Anonymous 08/25/14(Mon)11:32 No.2502005
lmao?
>> [_] Anonymous 08/25/14(Mon)11:36 No.2502010
I feel like I'm 70 again. Good old days.
>> [_] Anonymous 08/25/14(Mon)11:37 No.2502012
Listening to this brought me back to a late 90s summer where I spent my days trading Pokemon
cards with neighbourhood kids and having camp fires.
T-thanks..
>> [_] Anonymous 08/25/14(Mon)11:51 No.2502028
>>2501990
going straight away from the Earth is the stupidest trajectory possible, it's so wasteful (if
fuel is even an issue for) and the force required to propel the ship would exert force on the
crew equal to their acceleration.
>> [_] Anonymous 08/25/14(Mon)11:58 No.2502033
>>2502028
Not necessarily true. A theoretical basis exists which allows for the possibility of translating
a region of spacetime by creating a contracting region of spacetime in front of the vessel and an
expanding region behind the vessel. For such a device, no acceleration would be imparted onto the
vessel or its contents. Additionally, if this device is the primary mode of propulsion for the
vessel, a hyperbolic escape orbit would be the most efficient use of fuel, since it moves
directly toward the desired destination, translating the least amount of spacetime.
>> [_] Anonymous 08/25/14(Mon)12:04 No.2502035
>>2501990
mah nigga
>> [_] Anonymous 08/25/14(Mon)12:21 No.2502044
Old world blues.
>> [_] Anonymous 08/25/14(Mon)12:25 No.2502045
>>2502033
Y-yeah
>> [_] Anonymous 08/25/14(Mon)12:32 No.2502050
>>2502033
Well yeah, obviously.
>> [_] Anonymous 08/25/14(Mon)12:37 No.2502056
>>2501990
i saw that video last time when i was 5 i think
holy shit
>> [_] Anonymous 08/25/14(Mon)12:57 No.2502068
>>2502033
Those drives require some hefty gravity assists to pull them into a stable orbit with whatever
they were aiming for though.
>> [_] Anonymous 08/25/14(Mon)13:00 No.2502073
>>2501990
ayy lmao
