/ > /fap/ > Thread 6508
Age: 43.25d Health: 34% Posters: 18 Posts: 34 Replies: 30 Files: 1+3
>> Nanonymous 10jan2015(sa)05:39 No.17057 OP P1
yet another zone "hack"
not mine
[IMG] starfire_loop(blackfire_edit)-beta-1.swf (3.22 MiB)
1280x720, Uncompressed. 186 frames, 24 fps (00:08).
Ver12, AS3. Network access: No. Text: Yes.
Bitmaps: Yes. Audio: Yes. Video: No. <METADATA>
[find in archive]
>> Anonymous 10jan2015(sa)17:05 No.17062 A P2R1
>>17057
what exactly is hacked here?
looks like the zone's first animated loop to me
>> Anonymous 10jan2015(sa)19:21 No.17064 B P3R2
>>17062
are you colorblind?
>> Anonymous 10jan2015(sa)21:24 No.17067 C P4R3
>>17062
Changed from blackfire to starfire and a belt strap removed.
>> Anonymous 11jan2015(su)03:05 No.17077 D P5R4
ah i see
>> Anonymous 11jan2015(su)19:53 No.17097 A P6R5
I totally didn't remember that the original starred Blackfire. The old ZTVs were about Starfire.
Then again, I'm not very familiar with the series.
>> Anonymous 12jan2015(mo)00:08 No.17114 B P7R6
>>17097
You should watch it then. Teen Titans is actually really good.
It's basically Justice Leauge with anime-like humor.
>> Anonymous 12jan2015(mo)05:33 No.17116 E P8R7
eyes are wrong, but otherwise it looks okay.
>>17114
yeah, Teen Titans was pretty baller. new series sucks though, lol randumb humor was never teen
titans thing, more like white people making an anime.
>> Anonymous 12jan2015(mo)10:27 No.17124 B P9R8
>>17116
yeah... the so called new series sucks ass.
>more like white people making an anime.
Dude, what? Was there a scene of Cyborg eating KFC and water melon I didn't get?
Don't start with this 'white people', 'black people' bullshit.
It's the sole fault of the two fucking retards responsible for the script. They didn't even watch
the old show before they made the new one. That's also why BeastBoy is eating meat in some scenes,
despite beeing a Vegan... and pretty much everything else beeing wrong.
The old show and other good ones, like Avatar, were also done by 'white people' and had plenty of
anime influence. And it was awesome!
>> Anonymous 12jan2015(mo)10:33 No.17127 F P10R9
>>17124
>tfw he said nothing about black people
>> Anonymous 12jan2015(mo)11:39 No.17129 B P11R10
>>17127
What if I told you: I never said he did. Neither did I.
If he had said:
>more like american/western people making an anime.
I'd still disagree, for the same reasons I mentioned, but I wouldn't be as unnerved.
You can't just poke fun at 'white people' specifically and pretend it's not racist.
>Don't start with this 'white people', 'black people' bullshit.
People are people and for all I care they could be checkered.
>> Anonymous 12jan2015(mo)12:15 No.17130 G P12R11
>>17129
If anything they were being more white-asians than white-blacks. The point they were making is that
anime is an asian product, as far as I'm aware you can't actually produce the style outside of
Japan without a merit to say so or something to that effect. The point they were making is that it
wasn't anime but it might as well have been.
>> Anonymous 12jan2015(mo)12:46 No.17135 B P13R12
>>17130
>The point they were making is that it wasn't anime but it might as well have been.
I'm afraid you didn't get the point. No offence, really. (Most people say that to not seem the ass
they are, but I catually want to clarify here)
Just re-read these parts:
him: >>17116
>new series sucks though, lol randumb humor was never teen titans thing, more like white people
making an anime.
>negative statement. white people making anime.
me:
>>17124
>The old show and other good ones, like Avatar, were also done by 'white people' and had plenty of
anime influence. And it was awesome!
>western shows. Anime influence.
... dafuq am I doing with my time discussing on the internet anyway?
*flys away on the book of Azarath*
>> Anonymous 12jan2015(mo)13:09 No.17138 D P14R13
>>17135
Hey we all gotta waste our time in some way, might as well be here!
>> Anonymous 12jan2015(mo)18:05 No.17139 H P15R14
As this is not tumblr please leave your tumblr shit at tumblr, thank you.
>> Anonymous 12jan2015(mo)21:53 No.17141 I P16R15
>>17139
I've never been on tumblr.
please define 'tumblr shit'.
>> Anonymous 12jan2015(mo)22:48 No.17142 J P17
>>17141
Definition:
This threads Teen Titan argument.
>> Anonymous 12jan2015(mo)23:38 No.17144 I P18
>>17142
that's the 'problem'?
lol. You guys should be happy there is activity on the board that isn't recycled flashes, furry or
borderline illegal content for once.
>> Anonymous 14jan2015(we)06:07 No.17167 K P19R16
>>17144
>isn't recycled
You mean the flash that is literally just a recolor? By that logic, Mysterious Anon was pumping out
originals left and right two years back.
>> Anonymous 14jan2015(we)08:39 No.17171 I P20R17
>>17167
How can you be so dumb and still breathe?
I'd suggest you read more than just one comment before you type a reply that completely ignores the
context.
>> Anonymous 15jan2015(th)05:08 No.17183 L P21R18
>>17171
You mean the part where a bunch of dipshits argue like brainless Tumblr zombies on a porn flash?
Yeah, no, that isn't the least bit relevant to my point about the content of the actual post
whatsoever in response to claiming it's somehow good.
>> Anonymous 15jan2015(th)08:36 No.17184 M P22R19
>>17183
Dude.... I've never been on tumblr, ever. I think you are the only one in the whole fucking thread
who's ever been on tumblr and, apparently, can't shut up about it. So much for that point then.
And yeah. It's an argument under a porn flash. So fucking what?
It's not my fault when you are to retarded to either take part in or simply ignore a discussion.
Not to mention that you still misinterpret the previous comment.
And concerning that: What are you doing right now?
You started an argument about people starting an argument.
How fucking stupid are you? Like, seriously!
Are you also running around in real life and tell people at public places they should talk
somewhere else about something and what brainless tubmlr zombies they are?
At least you know how to use sarcasm, I give you that. But it seems like that's it.
PS: Yeah, Teen Titans is rather good. lolololololol
But really now: Don't like it? Don't look at it, don't read, don't respond.
Problem solved.
It takes only slightly more brain than talking utter bullshit. I know you can do it.
>> Anonymous 15jan2015(th)09:50 No.17185 N P23R20
Well that was boring.
>> Anonymous 15jan2015(th)14:38 No.17186 J P24R21
>>17184
>"But really now: Don't like it? Don't look at it, don't read, don't respond. Problem solved."
Tell me, what makes YOU exempt from this golden fix-all rule of yours?
>> Anonymous 15jan2015(th)16:33 No.17189 M P25R22
>>17186
>Tell me, what makes YOU exempt from this golden fix-all rule of yours?
Well, at least your comments can't get any more illogical now.
I wasn't the one complaining about an argument in the first place or anything else for that matter.
Which renders this question rather moot.
Any other mindful thoughts you want to share?
It's actually kind of funny to see how much more nonsense you can produce in an hopeless attempt to
justify your prior nonsense.
And all this on the internet.
>> Anonymous 15jan2015(th)17:38 No.17194 J P26R23
>>17189
First of all, I'm "J" your argument is with posts "L", "K" and "I"
I'm not the same guy.
>"I wasn't the one complaining about an argument in the first place or anything else for that
matter."
Great, you are complaining though.
And your own rules state that you should neither read it nor comment on it if you do not like it.
>"Which renders this question rather moot."
It certainly does not.
What stopped you from using this advice yourself when you read the original comment that you didn't
like?
Surely you could've just ignored the comments you didn't like? (like you told everyone else to do)
And don't try to tell me it's only applicable to the posts you find it convenient to apply this
rule-set to.
>> Anonymous 15jan2015(th)22:06 No.17199 M P27R24
>>17194
>First of all, I'm "J" your argument is with posts "L", "K" and "I"
You do know that these letters don't work all the time, right?
I'm also Anon B and I, for example.
I can't possibly know if you really are someone else or not so naturally I assume you are the same
person when you reply that way.
It's quite possible that there are only 3 people in this thread and we'll never know.
And I'm not complaining. Never was.
In fact I'm laughing my ass of over that retard :D
>> Anonymous 16jan2015(fr)05:46 No.17209 O P28R25
>>17199
Ah, but in reality there was only one poster; OP, trying to shill his thread because....
HE is the hacker! *scare chord*
>> Anonymous 17jan2015(sa)21:11 No.17246 A P29R26
Ad hominem. Ad hominem everywhere.
>> Anonymous 18jan2015(su)06:54 No.17261 L P30R27
>>17199
>"lel I trol u"
>gets called out on hypocrisy
>"I was only pretending to be retarded!"
Of course, how silly of me. fucking hell, is a single post in this shitheap actually about the
flash besides the first four or so?
>> Anonymous 18jan2015(su)08:30 No.17262 P P31R28
i came here for the NO YOU discussion that seem to go nowere
>> Anonymous 18jan2015(su)13:02 No.17266 Q P32R29
>>17261
>is a single post in this shitheap actually about the flash besides the first four or so
Is it ever like that?
Let's be honest here: Most threads either drift of just like that or they have like 5 comments or
less.
>> Anonymous 18jan2015(su)13:03 No.17267 Q P33
>>17266
Oh, and I got a new Letter again.
>> Anonymous 18jan2015(su)14:16 No.17271 D P34R30
>>17267
means that you're on a new ip
>>17261
well i know yours isn't
