File: Swing it loop2.swf-(5.21 MB, 1280x720, Loop)
[_] Mememe aint dead yet Anonymous 02/03/15(Tue)12:00 No.2678518
My first attempt at video/audio editing. Still ticked off at the gap in the loop.
Marked for deletion (old).
>> [_] Anonymous 02/03/15(Tue)12:08 No.2678521
>>2678518
This could easily still be larger with a better encoding.
Plenty of space left before max upload size.
You're just over half the allowed space.
Love it though. Keep at it. You'll get it the way you like it.
>> [_] Anonymous 02/03/15(Tue)12:10 No.2678522
>>2678521
I wound up with an AVI file after editing and the program I found to convert to flash didnt give
me any size options, any suggestions on a better one? The AVI is about 55 megs and doest have the
pause at the end.
>> [_] Anonymous 02/03/15(Tue)12:11 No.2678523
>>2678522
I don't know very much myself about settings for flash encoding and such. I've never really
converted files to flash, only heard others efforts on here.
Hopefully someone will swing by and help.
>> [_] Anonymous 02/03/15(Tue)12:33 No.2678533
What am I looking at
>> [_] Anonymous 02/03/15(Tue)12:38 No.2678541
>>2678533
Dangly bits, have you not watched me!me!me!?
>> [_] Anonymous 02/03/15(Tue)12:41 No.2678544
Im playing with a program now call AVC. ts give more options and Im getting larger files with
less blur but they have tearing instead.
>> [_] Anonymous 02/03/15(Tue)14:30 No.2678591
Favorite part of song
>thank you based anon ;_;
>> [_] Anonymous 02/03/15(Tue)16:38 No.2678674
What's the song?
>> [_] Anonymous 02/03/15(Tue)17:05 No.2678696
>>2678521
There's no reason to make bloated .swfs even though internet speed is no longer a restriction. 10
mb for a shortish loop is just stupid imo.
>> [_] Anonymous 02/03/15(Tue)17:08 No.2678698
>>2678591
fuck you
>> [_] Anonymous 02/03/15(Tue)17:23 No.2678716
>>2678696
But just look at this shitty quality. Even if loop is extremely short fade effect and RED RED
EVERYWHERE just wrecks video encoders. It's not fun to look on those squares.
>> [_] Anonymous 02/03/15(Tue)17:36 No.2678727
>>2678674
anybody know?
>> [_] Anonymous 02/03/15(Tue)17:37 No.2678728
>>2678716
This.
Encoders generally hate red colors and are usually designed to treat with less respect since red
colors tend to be a foundational color in scenes, rather than structural.
Even JPG compression does it as well. Which is why it was always fucking annoying when people
made image macros or informational / commentary text using red. Fuck.
So that is why it will be a bitch to get this looking nice without a high file size.
>> [_] Anonymous 02/03/15(Tue)17:44 No.2678732
>>2678518
>Mememe aint dead yet
i wish it were though
