File: 1080P60FPS.swf-(9.92 MB, 1280x720, Loop)
[_] Anonymous 07/26/15(Sun)13:55:36 No.2857321
>> [_] Anonymous 07/26/15(Sun)14:03:42 No.2857329
couldn't you picked something more generic OP?
also
>1080p
>1280x720
>> [_] Anonymous 07/26/15(Sun)14:05:43 No.2857330
>>2857329
swf h264 makes the files 1280x720 but the original flv that was to be embedded was 1080p
>> [_] Anonymous 07/26/15(Sun)14:09:06 No.2857332
>>2857330
that's nice but what of it if it's still in 720
>> [_] Anonymous 07/26/15(Sun)14:11:07 No.2857333
>>2857330
Hey there, I'm Alex.
I'm running this here car dealership, and were selling cars!
What's that you say? Those are toasters?
No, those are cars, but when they fold them into the delivery trucks to get here, they turn them
into toasters.
But they were cars once, fuck you! Buy my cars!
>> [_] Anonymous 07/26/15(Sun)14:12:49 No.2857335
>>2857332
check the flash metadata faggot
>> [_] Anonymous 07/26/15(Sun)14:13:05 No.2857336
Cool nature shit, now try a drama, looks like shit.
>> [_] Anonymous 07/26/15(Sun)14:27:43 No.2857344
it certainly doesn't look 60fps though. Eitherway swf flash files are no place to demonstrate
bandwidth sucking high bitrate samples.
>> [_] Anonymous 07/26/15(Sun)14:45:07 No.2857356
>>2857344
why should that matter as long at they are under 10mb?
>> [_] Anonymous 07/26/15(Sun)14:50:43 No.2857359
Why isn't more shit in 1080p 60fps? We've had the technology for years now, and it still looks
stunning because we never use it.
Also why do movies/tv shows look like home videos in 60fps?
>> [_] Anonymous 07/26/15(Sun)16:13:14 No.2857400
mother of god
imagine if we had a bigger file size limit
>> [_] Anonymous 07/26/15(Sun)16:16:14 No.2857403
>>2857359
Because everyone is used to the framerate being limited to 24fps.
>> [_] Anonymous 07/26/15(Sun)16:17:39 No.2857406
Very nice. Sauce on music?
>> [_] Anonymous 07/26/15(Sun)16:25:40 No.2857413
>>2857406
Music By U137
Song: Watching the Storm
