File: amd or intel.swf-(5.98 MB, 176x132, Other)
[_] Anonymous 08/02/15(Sun)09:34:49 No.2863989
Let's get this straight once and for all.
Marked for deletion (old).
>> [_] Anonymous 08/02/15(Sun)10:11:42 No.2864007
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2j16D8ncT00
>> [_] Anonymous 08/02/15(Sun)10:13:46 No.2864008
This video is hilarious
Anyways, Intel CPU's are better per core so they are better for games. Owned by Jews though so
it's priced more expensive compared to AMD cpu's. If the game uses all your CPU cores, AMD runs
great especially for the price but most games only use two cores.
So depending on the game AMD will either work decently or really shit but we can't really
complain too much because if they don't exist Intel will have a monopoly in their hands
thx 4 reading my blog
>> [_] Anonymous 08/02/15(Sun)10:19:04 No.2864012
>>2864008
but does AMD have more gigabytes and harddrives than Intel? im not really sure
>> [_] Anonymous 08/02/15(Sun)10:23:37 No.2864015
>>2864008
>buying overpriced CPUs for games
Anon, AMD is for gaming, if you need power for work use Intel.
>> [_] Anonymous 08/02/15(Sun)10:27:07 No.2864018
>>2864015
Different anon here -
I have a FX-6300 @ 4.4 GHz. Works quite decently, the only thing drawing me back is my GPU (GTX
660), but I kind of agree, that Intel is better for gaming, BUT!
But it's most likely for now because more and more games are utilizing all cores.
Except shitty ports.
>> [_] Anonymous 08/02/15(Sun)10:34:32 No.2864021
Intel is better because it has blast processing.... kappa
>> [_] Anonymous 08/02/15(Sun)10:35:11 No.2864022
>>2864018
You may be a different Anon but I have the same CPU as well. :^)
I plan to buy a new Motherboard soon though since mine is pretty crap and it also keeps making my
screen black out every now and then. Will probably get an i5 as well but I'll be keeping my r9
270 for now.
>> [_] Anonymous 08/02/15(Sun)11:03:37 No.2864030
>>2864022
Yeah.. I'll stick to AMD until their demise.
I had a HD 7770 until like a week ago a british guy sent me his GTX 660 because it was collecting
dust.
>> [_] Anonymous 08/02/15(Sun)11:05:49 No.2864034
>>2864015
this
AMD itself is (more than) enough for gaming. And it's not likely that your game will occupy 80%
of your CPU processing power anyway.
Intel is like the jack of all trades. If you require high performance processor, use Intel.
I use Intel just because it has more cores so I could fit more VMs running at a time.
>> [_] Anonymous 08/02/15(Sun)12:15:11 No.2864053
Is this kid a tard?
>> [_] Anonymous 08/02/15(Sun)12:27:51 No.2864059
>>2864034
>intel has more cores
wait what?
8 cores on AMD vs 4 cores on Intel
>> [_] Anonymous 08/02/15(Sun)12:29:13 No.2864060
>>2864012
it's gigahardrives you dumb shit go back to best buy you shitter
>> [_] Anonymous 08/02/15(Sun)12:29:33 No.2864061
>>2864059
He probably uses the 6 core Intel, and claims that that the AMD cores aren't full cores.
>> [_] Anonymous 08/02/15(Sun)12:31:58 No.2864064
>>2864059
which one are you referencing?
I have 8 cores on my 4790k
>> [_] Anonymous 08/02/15(Sun)12:33:10 No.2864067
I need all 8 cores to run Spelunky and Hearthstone!!
>> [_] Anonymous 08/02/15(Sun)12:55:49 No.2864084
>>2864053
no, he is just a kid trying to sound like an expert
>> [_] Anonymous 08/02/15(Sun)13:02:09 No.2864094
>>2864059
AMD cores share the FP unit, so if you're doing FP you only have 4 "real cores".
The average used doesn't even use many cores for anything, so this kind of discussion is mostly a
waste of time from people who think all there is to it is "who has the bigger numbers that won't
help me at all".
>> [_] Anonymous 08/02/15(Sun)13:12:56 No.2864107
>>2864064
No, you have 4 cores on your 4790k, with hyperthreading giving you 8 threads.
>> [_] Anonymous 08/02/15(Sun)13:32:11 No.2864127
I fucking love the concept of a "gigaharddrive" It just sounds awesome.
>> [_] Anonymous 08/02/15(Sun)14:35:57 No.2864169
>>2863989
He barely fits on camera....
>> [_] Anonymous 08/02/15(Sun)14:43:02 No.2864174
>>2864127
the predecessor to cloud
