File: Shanghai Dynasty.swf-(134 KB, 636x475, Game)
[_] let's play a game shall we? Anonymous 07/12/15(Sun)06:19:01 No.2842316
just on more try
Marked for deletion (old).
>> [_] Anonymous 07/12/15(Sun)07:33:47 No.2842339
>>2842316
muh nigga
>> [_] Anonymous 07/12/15(Sun)08:00:16 No.2842347
>>2842316
how do I play?
>> [_] Anonymous 07/12/15(Sun)08:04:01 No.2842348
>>2842347
nevermind, I see
>> [_] Anonymous 07/12/15(Sun)08:06:16 No.2842350
it's like a pexeso but with like two sets of card so there are 4 same cards from each type
there are unique looking cards like with words SUM AUT WIN and SPR which you can combine however
you like
then PLUM MUM ORC and BAM which you combine however you like (I'm not sure with this tho)
you can use cards that are on the edges of the sides
you can't use the one which are on top, bottom or in between cards
what I do at the beginning is that I try to match the cards which are on very top and on the very
end of each side so you can unlock as many cards as you can
>> [_] Anonymous 07/12/15(Sun)08:23:20 No.2842356
>>2842350
wew, thanks. I managed to beat the for kids version without an adult's assistance.
>> [_] Anonymous 07/12/15(Sun)08:27:45 No.2842357
fuck your solitaire
>> [_] Anonymous 07/12/15(Sun)08:43:35 No.2842361
>6 blocks left
>lose
fuck me
>> [_] Anonymous 07/12/15(Sun)08:47:26 No.2842364
It put the matching tiles on top of each other. There was nothing left. THERE WAS NOTHING BUT
THOSE TWO FUCKING TILES!
>> [_] Anonymous 07/12/15(Sun)08:51:13 No.2842366
There's always the possibility that the game could be broken from the start (all four of a single
tile stacked on top of each other, for the most obvious example) but I think it's pretty unlikely.
If all four tiles of a single type are accessible, removing all four will never break the game
(if it wasn't already broken) but removing only two could possibly break the game. Removing two
when you don't know you can remove the other two is always slightly risky. (But you almost always
have to take many risks)
The worst possible situation after removing a pair is that one of the other two is covered by
many tiles and difficult to access, while the other is accessible and covering many tiles. This
is why it's always better to wait until you can see all four tiles before removing any (if
possible) and work from the "outside" (tiles blocking many others) "in" (tiles that aren't
blocking many others).
I think the first objective is to identify groups with all four tiles visible, then plan to
uncover them while uncovering as many non-visible tiles, and taking out tiles that block many
other tiles, while doing that.
>> [_] Anonymous 07/12/15(Sun)08:52:40 No.2842368
>>2842364
You removed the other two matching tiles, scrublord. :)
>> [_] Anonymous 07/12/15(Sun)08:54:45 No.2842369
>>2842350
Yes, flowers and seasons. Plum blossom, Mum, Orchid, and Bamboo shoot, and Summer, Autumn, Winter
and Spring.
>> [_] Anonymous 07/12/15(Sun)09:10:55 No.2842374
>>2842361
>>2842364
>>2842366
that's the risk you have to take... this case is similar with solitaire when you really don't
know if you have the winning set or not... sometimes it's just impossible to win even if you
could do all the possibilities
>> [_] Anonymous 07/12/15(Sun)11:18:29 No.2842460
The logic of this game does not make sense at times. I could probably play a lot better if I had
a full understanding of the rules.
>> [_] Anonymous 07/12/15(Sun)11:19:23 No.2842462
>almost finished
>stare in disbelief
>last two tiles
>stacked on top of eachother
>"No more available moves!"
...
>> [_] Anonymous 07/12/15(Sun)11:44:20 No.2842480
>>2842460
pair identical free tiles with eachother. it's considered "free" if it's exposed, on the outside
and/or corner
>> [_] Anonymous 07/12/15(Sun)12:04:57 No.2842492
>tfw 100 IQ
Never gonna make it
