File: saving_puppies.swf-(7.38 MB, 352x262, Other)
[_] Anonymous 04/01/16(Fri)21:57:09 No.3053548
Marked for deletion (old).
>> [_] Anonymous 04/01/16(Fri)22:03:57 No.3053551
(you)
>> [_] Anonymous 04/01/16(Fri)22:21:00 No.3053562
my gawd this should be taken down....
still sick
>> [_] Anonymous 04/01/16(Fri)22:21:50 No.3053564
well you and whoever taped this can get fucked
>> [_] Anonymous 04/01/16(Fri)22:28:28 No.3053569
>>3053564
>I like to complain about problems but not actually solve them
Seriously, the only reason anyone starves to death is because you aren't feeding them
>> [_] Anonymous 04/01/16(Fri)22:32:56 No.3053572
anyone got the youtube video?
>> [_] Anonymous 04/01/16(Fri)22:34:41 No.3053573
i like my streak like my jews gased not cooked over a open flame.
>> [_] Anonymous 04/01/16(Fri)22:37:14 No.3053576
been so long what was the reason for tossing them in water?
>> [_] Anonymous 04/01/16(Fri)22:51:12 No.3053582
>>3053576
Because it's rural region of Bosnia (or some other former Yugoslavia country, I don't remember)
and that's the only thing you can do if you get unwanted puppies. They don't have dog shelters.
Everyone in the village usually already have at least one guard dog so most likely no one will
need another puppy. And you can't just let them let them free because one day those stray dogs
will cause lots of trouble.
And it's not something unusual or shocking even for the first world countries.
>> [_] Anonymous 04/01/16(Fri)22:51:19 No.3053583
>>3053576
probably not enough money/people/time to take care of them, better a quick death than death by
neglect
>> [_] Anonymous 04/01/16(Fri)23:03:35 No.3053591
>>3053582
>>3053583
So basically traditional population control (i.e. infanticide) that we now see as literally the
worst thing possible
>> [_] Anonymous 04/01/16(Fri)23:16:13 No.3053595
>>3053582
I know it's a bit brutal, but they can't figure out how to snap a neck? They had to throw them
into the water?
>> [_] Anonymous 04/01/16(Fri)23:34:48 No.3053605
>>3053595
It is a rather traditional thing to drown puppies rather than to snap their necks, perhaps just
so that the person killing them doesn't have to hear the scream.
>> [_] Anonymous 04/01/16(Fri)23:38:59 No.3053606
>>3053595
snapping a puppy's neck is less brutal than throwing them into a river?
>> [_] Anonymous 04/01/16(Fri)23:42:31 No.3053608
>>3053606
Well at least the puppy dies a bit faster doesn't experience the pain of not having oxygen
>> [_] Anonymous 04/01/16(Fri)23:44:24 No.3053610
>>3053591
>we
>implying
>> [_] Anonymous 04/01/16(Fri)23:47:35 No.3053613
>>3053608
You know that by snapping one's neck, you kill them by a lack of oxygen right? They don't die
immediately like the movies.
>> [_] Anonymous 04/02/16(Sat)00:16:47 No.3053628
>Guaranteed replies
>> [_] Anonymous 04/02/16(Sat)00:42:19 No.3053636
>>3053564
Don't blame OP, he just reposted it.
Blame me, I made this flash.
(glad to see it's not forgotten, thanks)
>>3053572
All sources were taken down within weeks of the event, due to animal-rights faggotry.
The master for this flash I posted on my JewTube, and within hours it was deleted and I got a
warning/strike.
A full copy still exists on LiveLeak (watermarked), and a virgin copy still exists on
DailyMotion. Hunt around for it, you can find it in minutes. I might still have the hi-def copy
from a news outlet on some old hard drive or another, but I don't even know where to begin
looking, I have dozens.
>> [_] Anonymous 04/02/16(Sat)01:36:55 No.3053663
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=bb4_1283184704
