File: CAN'T STUMP.swf-(5.23 MB, 720x800, Loop)
[_] Anonymous 10/13/16(Thu)13:13:15 No.3162212
Marked for deletion (old).
>> [_] Anonymous 10/13/16(Thu)13:41:29 No.3162218
http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-election-forecast/
looks very much stumped to me
>> [_] Anonymous 10/13/16(Thu)13:51:09 No.3162222
>>3162218
>trusting the mainstream media to produce anything that isn't horrendously biased against Trump
That same site said Brexit had like a 5% chance of happening... and then it won in a landslide.
>> [_] Anonymous 10/13/16(Thu)13:53:47 No.3162225
>>3162222
>Brexit ... won in a landslide
51.9% is not a "landslide".
>> [_] Anonymous 10/13/16(Thu)14:06:56 No.3162234
>>3162225
Considering the large turnout numbers yeah a 2% win was pretty shocking.
Especially since all those 538 and other betting sites were saying 85-95% chance it loses.
I am not saying I know which candidate will win and for now I am expecting the worst while hoping
for the best but the point is you can't really trust anything the msm says especially in this
election cycle where they've lost their fucking minds and thrown aside any attempt to be unbiased.
I mean I guess that isn't illegal or anything but... I always thought its up to the citizens who
they wanna elect and the mainstream media or atleast the news shows really shouldn't be shilling
for any specific candidate. Its not their business to do so and just seems improper to me. But in
todays bought and sold world such thinking is painfully naive I guess.
>> [_] Anonymous 10/13/16(Thu)16:39:58 No.3162283
>>3162234
someone points out you're using the wrong word to make your case sound better? redefine the word,
and then just ignore it altogether and go off on a tangent nobody cares to read.
this is what they call 'backpaddling'
(except they don't)
>> [_] Anonymous 10/13/16(Thu)17:50:29 No.3162317
i'm still trying to figure out where the girl is from.
>> [_] Anonymous 10/13/16(Thu)18:02:03 No.3162321
>>3162283
lol, whatever friend.
not like it makes a difference.
the point was that betting sites and polling sites sometimes say one side is easily gonna win and
then they don't.
doesn't help that most of them are actively part of shill campaigns and are perfectly willing to
"cook the books" if its to help the establishment win.
>> [_] Anonymous 10/13/16(Thu)18:10:26 No.3162324
>>3162317
from America obviously. why else would she be wearing that hat and cheer for Trump? you retard you
