File: The Inclusion Delusion.swf-(8.53 MB, 432x240, Other)
[_] Reminder that under Obama Anonymous 11/15/16(Tue)20:03:13 No.3176833
That under Obama, race relations have gotten worse than under the Bush administration.
Marked for deletion (old).
>> [_] Anonymous 11/15/16(Tue)20:10:43 No.3176841
>fox news
>> [_] Anonymous 11/15/16(Tue)20:12:42 No.3176844
>muh fear mongering
>> [_] Anonymous 11/15/16(Tue)20:13:56 No.3176845
>>3176833
Don't flood.
>> [_] Anonymous 11/15/16(Tue)20:44:40 No.3176866
>>3176833
checked
>> [_] Anonymous 11/15/16(Tue)21:01:46 No.3176872
>>3176844
lol when did her fearmonger once, libcuck?
>> [_] Anonymous 11/15/16(Tue)21:02:09 No.3176873
beautiful strawman Bill, you poor retard
>> [_] Anonymous 11/15/16(Tue)21:20:21 No.3176881
[citation needed]
>> [_] Anonymous 11/15/16(Tue)21:20:58 No.3176883
>>3176841
>>3176844
>>3176873
I'm neither a fan of fox or billy, but what did he say that was wrong here? Let's have a
discussion
>> [_] Anonymous 11/15/16(Tue)21:25:01 No.3176885
>>3176833
While I have a feeling the data is biased, I like the way he provided current events for riots
was fair and I also agree with him that the current President was mistaken to believe that our
America is unified.
>> [_] Anonymous 11/15/16(Tue)21:26:31 No.3176887
>>3176873
>>3176883
actually yeah, as much as /f/ isn't a bastion for conversation, he makes some points and he
misses some marks here. some of the concerns he points out that people have could be argued as
illegitimate, but at the same time that doesn't change the fact that people still hold those
concerns. the mindset of the last 8 years has been a lot of handwaving and just calling people
silly for being worried about something because "they don't know real oppression". this doesn't
change the fact that they are a citizen with a concern. even if you take the stance that their
concern is fucking stupid to dismiss it like that can't be called inclusive can it?
I know it's fox news here but just humor me a little.
>> [_] Anonymous 11/15/16(Tue)21:34:29 No.3176889
bill o'reilly is such a badass :)
>> [_] Anonymous 11/15/16(Tue)21:37:33 No.3176893
>>3176873
>strawman
don't throw out words you heard others use, speak plain about what you mean and don't make people
guess.
you never appear smarter by making vague statements.
>> [_] Anonymous 11/15/16(Tue)21:52:24 No.3176894
>>3176833
This isnt what /f/ is for, anon.
This is the kind of thing that belongs on YouTube.
Please keep it there.
And if you want to share it with someone, /pol/ would appreciate it a lot more.
>> [_] Anonymous 11/15/16(Tue)22:00:31 No.3176900
>>3176894
even if you're not into politics, bill o'reilly makes great points that what a person perceives
as the minority opinion should not always be ignored, as there exists a silent majority. This
logic can be applied to not just politics, but arguments and other things in general.
I implore that /f/ watches this flash so content-creators who are afraid that their opinion is
under-represented will be encouraged and confident enough to make their own spin on stuff.
>> [_] Anonymous 11/15/16(Tue)22:04:51 No.3176903
>>3176883
the idea that religious groups are above the law, implied with the whole 'forcing nuns' thing -
the use of 'nun' and not 'religious groups' is supposed to make you feel bad for them.
the "hard-drug epidemic". What is a "hard" drug here? I'm 95% certain he's including weed here.
"all sane people". I hate shit like this.
>chicago is representative of the rest of the country
he's not saying trump will be good but rather that Obama was horrible, never addressing the
concerns he claims to have debunked. It's a fucking beautiful spin, really.
his fucking tone of voice makes me want to punch him
I'm willing to give him that illegal immigrants are a problem, and a voucher system for schools
could potentially bring benefits. But I cannot agree with the rest of his argument.
>> [_] Anonymous 11/15/16(Tue)22:04:51 No.3176904
>>3176900
Or you could just link the YouTube video like someone that has some damn sense.
>> [_] Anonymous 11/15/16(Tue)22:12:41 No.3176913
>>3176893
>ergo hoc propter hoc
Try checking you're fallicys before speaking.
>> [_] Anonymous 11/15/16(Tue)22:17:55 No.3176922
>>3176833
http://i.4cdn.org/f/weekend%20inside%20joke.swf
>> [_] Anonymous 11/15/16(Tue)22:19:17 No.3176923
>>3176903
>the idea that religious groups are above the law, implied with the whole 'forcing nuns' thing
So a group that actually believes funding abortion can potentially send them to hell should be
forced to pony up anyways? Guess I can go my local muslim baker and demand a cake of Mohammed
getting fucked by a pig too
>> [_] Anonymous 11/15/16(Tue)22:28:50 No.3176929
>>3176889
>bill o'reilly is such an ass :)
FTFY
>> [_] Anonymous 11/15/16(Tue)22:32:50 No.3176930
Hey guys, what's up?
>> [_] Anonymous 11/15/16(Tue)22:43:13 No.3176934
>>3176913
>throws out more incorrect buzzwords
>you're
>fallicys
>> [_] Anonymous 11/15/16(Tue)22:56:44 No.3176947
>>3176923
Religious groups should not be exempt from the laws of the lands they practice their religion in.
If they do not like having to comply with the law then they can take their religious services to
another country that has laws more in line with their religious views.
This is akin to saying (albeit an extreme example) that an Muslim can be above the law and
practice things from their religion that are otherwise illegal. This is true for any religion,
not just Christians and Muslim. There is no reason that those that choose to practice a religion
should be exempt from the law.
>> [_] Anonymous 11/15/16(Tue)23:00:38 No.3176950
>>3176903
>the "hard-drug epidemic". What is a "hard" drug here? I'm 95% certain he's including weed here.
how are you gonna criticize him when you make assumptions like this lmao
thousands of people do in fact die of cocaine and heroin OD in the USA every year
>> [_] Anonymous 11/15/16(Tue)23:22:00 No.3176955
>>3176934
(that's the joke.swf)
>> [_] Anonymous 11/15/16(Tue)23:30:45 No.3176957
Please get off /f/ with your political bullshit. That or do the usual and kill yourself.
>> [_] Anonymous 11/15/16(Tue)23:52:51 No.3176968
>>3176957
I concur. I'd rather see maddox shit posted than this stuff.
