File: Welcome to Dark Souls.swf-(9.99 MB, 428x240, Other)
[_] Anonymous 07/19/17(Wed)22:09:00 No.3263941
Marked for deletion (old).
>> [_] Anonymous 07/19/17(Wed)22:25:02 No.3263949
>blocking moonlight butterfly with knight shield leads to instant death
Hits close to home
>> [_] M-non 07/19/17(Wed)22:28:35 No.3263951
I'm a strength build scrub who rarely dies and cheated halfway through the game for infinite
souls and humanity using the weapon animation + estus flask use glitch that was never and will
never be patched. Game was too easy. Now dark souls 3 and bloodbourne, those are challenging,
still i started getting good at bloodbourne after the first couple of bosses, but dark souls 3 is
basically multiplayer reliant. fuck the twin princes, i can't beat them!!! Smaug and ornstein
were fucking pathetic compared to them in dark souls 3.
>> [_] Anonymous 07/19/17(Wed)22:35:27 No.3263954
>>3263951
Sounds like I've got something to look forward to. I finished Dark Souls a couple of weeks ago
and I'm most of the way through Dark Souls 2 now. I'll probably start the third one shortly after
that.
>> [_] Anonymous 07/19/17(Wed)22:36:03 No.3263956
>>3263951
>cheated
>game was too easy
Beat DS3 without any friendly phantoms, starting gear, no magic, a basic roleplay knight build.
>> [_] M-non 07/19/17(Wed)22:49:39 No.3263960
>>3263954
I got bored after legitimately beating my first run and got into new game plus, if i don't cheat
i just grind the dark forest because it is extremely easy and i pick on incoming enemy wraiths
and kill them for more, either way my strength build ate everything, never had dark souls 2, but
i am not sure if it is backwards compatible with xbox one.
>> [_] M-non 07/19/17(Wed)22:52:23 No.3263961
>>3263956
Dark souls 1 is easy whether or not I cheat.
step 1: strength build
step 2: dark knight sword
Step 3: farm dark forest
step 4: get havel's ring and stone golem gear
step 5: kill everything up to havel's armor in anor londo
step 6: kill everything in the game and get +5 sword and +5 giant gear
step 7: get bored and start cheating in new game + with the final bosses soul and a fire keep
soul.
Dark souls 3:
Step 1: try to tank things and fail
Step 2: manage to struggle getting halfway through the game and respec your skills
Step 3: try different builds and find out pyromancer is best
step 4: continue to die to bosses because they don't seem to have a logical pattern like dark
souls 1.
>> [_] Anonymous 07/19/17(Wed)23:21:29 No.3263972
Dark souls 1 is baby mode. Demon's Souls was the truth.
TL;DR OP sucks and the guy who made this sucks at games.
>> [_] Anonymous 07/19/17(Wed)23:50:51 No.3263982
>>3263972
Demon's Souls is ezmode compared to DS3 DLCs.
>> [_] Anonymous 07/19/17(Wed)23:52:08 No.3263983
>>3263961
More like
Dark souls 3:
Step 1: Choose cleric, worst beginning class in the entire game
Step 2: Struggle through bosses at a much slower pace than everyone, only leveling faith and
attunement
Step 3: Put a shit ton of points into vitality, achieve the lightning stake and lightning spear
Step 4: Equip talisman, start succeeding with the dodging skills you've gained and massively
damaging miracles
Step 5: Beat the game, begin to rape others with the talisman in pvp since you are now the only
thing with poise.
>> [_] Anonymous 07/19/17(Wed)23:52:27 No.3263984
>>3263961
>don't have a logical pattern like dark souls 1
No shit, DS1 AI is piss easy. You can trade blows the entire game and win
DS3 is like DS1, but with easier rolling, and the AI has roll-catch attacks
Protip: Try pressing the roll button when the enemy attacks
>> [_] Anonymous 07/19/17(Wed)23:54:48 No.3263989
>>3263982
Except the DLCs were easy? The only difficulty comes from their health pool, which means nothing
if you don't have a shit build
>> [_] Anonymous 07/20/17(Thu)00:03:15 No.3263990
>>3263989
this. Anyone who argues "but muh angels" is shit at the game.
>> [_] Anonymous 07/20/17(Thu)05:35:45 No.3264060
>>3263941
anyone know how to do this???
I'm trying to convert an mp4 into an swf and have it loop, and I have no idea how to do it.
>> [_] Anonymous 07/20/17(Thu)05:39:28 No.3264063
>>3264060
you do it in flash, but flash doesn't support .mp4, so you'll have higher chances to convert it
to a .webm with ffmpeg
Also did something happen between you and google? Doesn't he response to you anymore when you ask
him something?
>> [_] Anonymous 07/20/17(Thu)06:14:39 No.3264070
>>3264060
http://eye.swfchan.com/services/swfh264/
http://tools.swfchan.com/
>> [_] Anonymous 07/20/17(Thu)08:20:30 No.3264086
>>3263951
>Smaug