File: Reminder Clock.swf-(2.71 MB, 1280x720, Loop)
[_] I like big ol' clocks :v 06/30/17(Fri)21:57:19 No.

  Trying a diff music style, since I like clams casino so much I decided to give that style a go.

  Hi /f/rens

Marked for deletion (old).
>> [_] Anonymous 06/30/17(Fri)22:09:24 No.

  >>3258151
  What inspires you to keep posting on a anonymous image board with new stuff?

  I couldn't see myself having the effort to actually ever make a thread, let alone make OC

>> [_] Anonymous 06/30/17(Fri)22:15:04 No.

  >>3258151
  at first I thought you made those lines in flash but sadly it's just a gif :<
  it's a nice looking clock anyway

>> [_] Anonymous 06/30/17(Fri)22:22:36 No.

  nice job, its nice
  please make more

>> [_] :v 06/30/17(Fri)22:22:39 No.

  >>3258153
  I just like doing it, I like the feedback and talking to other /f/rens.
  >>3258154
  I wish, I tried so many things... but...they all looked like poopshit to me..
  I just can't get the animations smooth and I think It's because I'm trying to use keyframes like
  it just making gifs.

  I feel bad I thought I sourced the artist
  Oh well... its Thomas L Ricci
  >http://www.thomaslricci.com/

>> [_] godk 07/01/17(Sat)00:35:26 No.

  >>3258151
  greetz, /f/ren.

  >>3258157
  actually, it's quite a bit like making a GIF... but on steroids.
  If you have some discomfort with animating in Flash...
  have you ever read "The Animator's Toolkit"?
  It's indispensable, and may just give you the kick you need to get cozy with making your Flash
  fluid. There's a lot of amazing stuff in there, and it applies to any form of animated imagery.

  https://www.scribd.com/doc/127037229/The-Animator-s-Survival-Kit-Richard-Williams-English-pdf

  >>3258153
  Not to hijack :v 's thread, but for me, I like to polish my creative cycle...
  I use you anons to figure out "what sells" and focus more on that. But ultimately, I think any
  author just does what the author likes to do.

  More than half of my Flashes are panned because what I like isn't in anon's "field of taste", and
  I don't give a fig. It just means it gets forgotten and not reposted, which is probably for the
  best. Experience is cumulative.

  Do what you like to do, but sniff the wind for where you can improve your craft.
  Never let anon cripple your muse; remember, anon is highly neurotic and probably a raging
  aspie... and doesn't actually create anything, other than flaky critique.

  :v -
  Never stop blogpoasting here, k? I think identifiable authors give this board a bit of flavor and
  "ethnicity" as it were. That, and we like your Flash work.

>> [_] Anonymous 07/01/17(Sat)00:38:30 No.

  >>3258219
  >identifiable authors give this board a bit of flavor and "ethnicity" as it were.
  Wrong. Anonymity is its own culture, this is why namefaggotry always devolves into total and
  complete cancer, namefags (like you) get egos.

>> [_] godk 07/01/17(Sat)01:07:54 No.

  >>3258220
  >Wrong.
  And what makes you an authority, you who cannot own their own commentary? What have you produced
  to further this community?
  Yeah, that's what I thought. NOTHING.

  And you want to talk about 'cancer'. All my kek.

>> [_] Anonymous 07/01/17(Sat)01:08:30 No.

  >>3258220
  gofuckyourself.exe

>> [_] Anonymous 07/01/17(Sat)01:14:46 No.

  >>3258220
  Namefags got balls, something you and I
  ain't got.

>> [_] Anonymous 07/01/17(Sat)01:19:13 No.

  >>3258220
  I agree with you anon. Though I don't have a problem with individual namefags per se, it does
  defeat the purpose of an anonymous imageboard.

>> [_] :v 07/01/17(Sat)01:21:47 No.

  >>3258219
  Thank for the link, I'll def give it a read.
  I will blogpoast as long as people are here to tell me to go kill myself ;DD

  >>3258220
  >egos
  >guys, please like rate and subscribe ECKS DEEE

  For me, there is nothing I am doing that anyone should be proud of. I can't speak for others but
  I imagine most OC is just made for fun nowadays.
  I'd like to think that people see my posts and say "well fuck I can do that.." and go on to make
  something really great.

>> [_] godk 07/01/17(Sat)01:25:47 No.

  >>3258235
  Just curious, what exactly is your definition of Anonymous?
  If you're a true lurker, you may have seen my viewpoints on Anonculture. I'm genuinely curious
  what yours is.

  Anonymity has its benefits; so does leadership in authorship. Sorry if I'm bursting balloons or
  putting sand in the collective vag.
  (this, and I like spurring threadcounts greater than 10).

>> [_] Anonymous 07/01/17(Sat)01:27:09 No.

  Bring back the 2 reply limit to /f/!