File: TheReturn.swf-(9.88 MB, 356x200, Loop)
[_] rip flash 2020 Anonymous 04/03/18(Tue)01:14:31 No.3326777
fuck, please dont die
Marked for deletion (old).
>> [_] Anonymous 04/03/18(Tue)02:57:34 No.3326805
>posts shitty video rip swfs
THIS IS EXACTLY WHY FLASH IS DYING YOU DOUBLE-NIGGER
>> [_] Anonymous 04/03/18(Tue)02:59:30 No.3326806
>>3326805
This is literally not a video rip. Don't use words you don't know the definition of.
>> [_] Anonymous 04/03/18(Tue)03:07:21 No.3326808
>>3326806
woooooow your youtube rip has butans!!1?!?
GOOD
FUCKING
JOB
FLASH IS SAVED
YOU SMELL GOOD
THX
>> [_] Anonymous 04/03/18(Tue)03:20:36 No.3326810
>>3326808
It's not mine, Jackass. Check the poster count.
You're such a retard.
>> [_] Anonymous 04/03/18(Tue)03:39:54 No.3326811
>>3326810
>implying poster count is a reliable metric
I MIGHT BE A RETARD AS EVIDENCED BY MY ANGRY CAVEMAN TYPING AND USE OF CRAP LIKE GREENTEXTING
BUT AT LEAST IM NOT DEFENDING VIDEO RIP GARBAGE
>> [_] Anonymous 04/03/18(Tue)11:34:36 No.3326848
>>3326777
stop repeating that flash is dead like the parrot you are. it's thanks to you people are getting
into the mindset that flash is gone so thanks to people like you there won't be an outrage when
browsers force support to go away
>> [_] Anonymous 04/03/18(Tue)17:51:34 No.3326888
>>3326848
>when browsers force support to go away
didn't they do that already?
>> [_] Anonymous 04/03/18(Tue)18:03:32 No.3326891
>>3326848
What the fuck was that fucking sentence, jesus fuck. Flash has been getting fucked since HTML5
came about; all the Flash Game sites are getting less and less visits. It's going to lose support
from everyone but us diehards
>>3326888
The only major one that seems to still support Flash is Firefox but I can't see that lasting much
longer...
>> [_] Anonymous 04/03/18(Tue)18:39:38 No.3326903
So what's the drawback to HTML5? I'm used to flash since it's been around and popular forever,
but it seems like HTML5 is pretty much the same experience on the user end. I'm not an expert
though so please correct me
>> [_] Anonymous 04/03/18(Tue)21:23:40 No.3326931
>>3326903
It's not implemented the same across all browsers, lacks some features (can't recall off of the
top of my head), requires svgs instead of whatever macromedia used for vector images, doesn't
have an offline player, freezes the browser if it gets stuck, etc.
