File[sandwich_thief.swf] - (1.19 MB)
[_] [?] Shitty furry animation Anonymous 12/03/09(Thu)22:52 No.1130582
>> [_] Anonymous 12/03/09(Thu)22:58 No.1130585
And yet you uploaded it...
>> [_] Anonymous 12/03/09(Thu)22:59 No.1130586
actually I'd say the animation's pretty good, although the theme is pretty boring and stupid
>> [_] Anonymous 12/03/09(Thu)22:59 No.1130587
I approve of the animation.
And the content, to a degree.
>> [_] Anonymous 12/03/09(Thu)23:16 No.1130600
I thought this would feature heavy... ='( I am dissapoint
>> [_] Anonymous 12/03/09(Thu)23:27 No.1130609
>>1130600
>Heavy
>not in "Shitty furry animation"
>dissapoint
>> [_] Anonymous 12/03/09(Thu)23:30 No.1130610
not bad actually
>> [_] Anonymous 12/03/09(Thu)23:38 No.1130614
needs more rape
>> [_] Anonymous 12/03/09(Thu)23:47 No.1130620
Preferably of the eye sockets.
>> [_] Anonymous 12/03/09(Thu)23:48 No.1130621
Needs color, but the animation itself is surprisingly fluid, and well done. If it ended with them
fucking it might not be too horrible. But overall, it's kind of pointless.
>> [_] Anonymous 12/03/09(Thu)23:57 No.1130624
>>1130621
yeah. I find the lack of frottage disturbing.
>> [_] Anonymous 12/04/09(Fri)00:02 No.1130628
>>1130624
With this level of talent, this person could be a fur-porn SUPER-STAR -- joining amongst the
ranks of Narse and Twinkle-Sez.
>> [_] Anonymous 12/04/09(Fri)00:14 No.1130632
artist find!
http://funkyalien.deviantart.com/gallery/#Animations
>> [_] Anonymous 12/04/09(Fri)00:44 No.1130651
WHY IS THIS DONE SO WELL ?!?!?!
>> [_] Anonymous 12/04/09(Fri)00:54 No.1130658
why does everything to a furry have to be furry
that could have been regular people and been exactly the same
and the animation itself was pretty decent
>> [_] Anonymous 12/04/09(Fri)00:58 No.1130661
>>1130651
Because the decent animation and """furry""" (note the triple quotation marks) are not mutually
exclusive?
Just take a look at every Disney film ever.
>> [_] Anonymous 12/04/09(Fri)01:38 No.1130680
It's a shame that the non-furries aren't as productive as the furrys they so despise.
>> [_] Anonymous 12/04/09(Fri)01:45 No.1130684
Was it furry or cat-girl?
Animation is good, but the flagrant amount of weabooness (or weeabooity if you will) kind of
hurts me.
>> [_] Anonymous 12/04/09(Fri)01:49 No.1130690
>>1130632
So not ALL his stuff is furry, that's good.
>> [_] Anonymous 12/04/09(Fri)01:52 No.1130693
>>1130684
definitely furry. they have cat noses and fur on their faces. catgirls are just humans with cat
ears and tails, and sometimes big fake cat paw gloves.
but what was weeabooish about this? I didn't see anything even vaguely japanese.
>> [_] Anonymous 12/04/09(Fri)02:01 No.1130702
Actually...the animation is pretty decent.
Premise...remotely amusing in a "I'm bored" sorta manner
I DEMAND THIS ARTIST CREATE PORN.
>> [_] Anonymous 12/04/09(Fri)02:03 No.1130703
>>1130693
The eyes and eybrows are straight up anime style and the "surprise lines around the characters
head" or whatever they hell it's called when she gets chased out of the kitchen is straight up
anime too.
Though maybe it's just infected animation too much and that's simply the norm now.
>> [_] CACTUAR 12/04/09(Fri)02:06 No.1130706
>>1130628
and zone :P
>> [_] Anonymous 12/04/09(Fri)02:09 No.1130713
/r/ing Jaggers
>> [_] Anonymous 12/04/09(Fri)02:13 No.1130717
>>1130713
Fuck no, that guy couldn't draw his way out of a box to save his life if it counted on it I'll
eat my hat if it's the last thing I do.
>> [_] Anonymous 12/04/09(Fri)02:14 No.1130719
SHE CAN'T ENJOY HER SANDWICH
>> [_] Anonymous 12/04/09(Fri)02:15 No.1130721
>>1130717
...
>> [_] Anonymous 12/04/09(Fri)02:21 No.1130726
>>1130717
10/10
>> [_] Silly Dog 12/04/09(Fri)02:25 No.1130731
>>1130717
My eyes were rewarded with this
Thanks anon
>> [_] Anonymous 12/04/09(Fri)02:27 No.1130732
>>1130731
np, i come up with all kinds of stuff in the wee hours of the morning :P
>> [_] Anonymous 12/04/09(Fri)02:30 No.1130736
Yiff in hell, furfags
>> [_] Anonymous 12/04/09(Fri)03:59 No.1130791
>>1130661
Riiiiiight. Because Disney is full of furries.
>> [_] Anonymous 12/04/09(Fri)04:01 No.1130793
The round thing in the sandwich changes sides, just thought you all should know that.
>> [_] Anonymous 12/04/09(Fri)04:20 No.1130807
>>1130791
Have you ever watched a Disney film? The Lion King, maybe? Disney's Robin Hood, the furriest
non-pornographic animation ever created?
>> [_] Anonymous 12/04/09(Fri)04:27 No.1130811
>>1130807
Since when do anthropomorphic animals = furry fandom? I remember Harlan Ellison got fired from
Disney just for making a joke about a Disney porno.
If any "funny animals" automatically make something furry, then by that logic I'm a furry for
liking Crash Bandicoot etc.
Liking Tom and Jerry =/= furry
Wanting to fuck Tom and/or Jerry = furry.
>> [_] Anonymous 12/04/09(Fri)04:40 No.1130816
>>1130811
Oh, and here I thought that dressing or charading as an anthromorphic animal was furry. Robin
Hood by Disney =/= furry. Tom and Jerry =/= furry. But this? This does = furry.
But in a good way. The animation is slick (except for that part just out of the kitchen. Kinda
laggy there. :/ ) and I applaud the animator.
>> [_] Anonymous 12/04/09(Fri)06:43 No.1130861
GTFO furfag
>> [_] Anonymous 12/04/09(Fri)07:08 No.1130867
That Admiral Ackbar soundboard really works well if I just use "It's a trap!" after reading every
single post in here.
