File: friday_at_last.swf-(1.02 MB, 550x400, Loop)
[_] Anonymous 04/19/19(Fri)19:42:07 No.3388112
Marked for deletion (old).
>> [_] Anonymous 04/19/19(Fri)19:51:52 No.3388113
I ordered a new computer today!
Picked GeForce RTX 2060. The 2070 is 50% more expensive but will only boost FPS by 10% at 1440p.
Sure, it has "just 6 GB" of VRAM but very few games use more than 4 GB anyway. Even at 4K,
whenever I get such a monitor, the card can still produce 30-50 fps. Games might become more
demanding over time but the graphic card drivers will also improve. No doubt RTX 2060 is the best
bang for your buck this year.
>> [_] Anonymous 04/19/19(Fri)20:00:39 No.3388116
>>3388113
do you think you'll get that sweet 60 fps on illusion games now?
>> [_] Anonymous 04/19/19(Fri)20:12:51 No.3388118
>>3388116
those things are demanding, hoping for at least 24 fps
>> [_] Anonymous 04/20/19(Sat)01:49:14 No.3388163
i feel like I see this every day. fuck, my life is racing by
>> [_] Anonymous 04/20/19(Sat)01:50:59 No.3388164
>>3388113
if you use a 3D render engine, you'll likely use way more than 6GB of video RAM on a heavy scene.
Something for folks to consider when selecting.
>> [_] Anonymous 04/20/19(Sat)09:53:42 No.3388194
>>3388164
i don't do 3D rendering or video editing. if i wanted to it would still work with 6 GB of VRAM,
things just gets slower.
same with any futire games that use all of 6 GB VRAM, there will just be more pop-ins as less
used textures gets replaced with the needed texture. not using ultra hd textures is also an
option in games, i find that it's usually not a big deal unless you are in VR.
i think more and more games will get better at texture management techniques as well. while
looking through benchmark videos i noticed that Witcher 3 only uses around 2 GB VRAM at maxed
settings in 4K which was a little surprising, either they simply don't have any 4K textures or
they do a really good job at swapping out textures for appropriate distances (lower res for
things further away and so forth).
>> [_] Anonymous 04/20/19(Sat)11:24:28 No.3388198
>>3388163
Fuckin this I swear it just went off the board and now it's back
>> [_] Anonymous 04/20/19(Sat)15:47:42 No.3388213
>>3388163
>>3388198
Marked for deletion (old).
>> [_] Anonymous 04/20/19(Sat)18:48:56 No.3388234
>>3388113
>buying Nvidia Shit
Who even wants to play the "new" CallOfBattlefield with 1337000p?
I use 1080p and get all the frames with a fraction of the cost and not buying from shit tier
companies.
But I guess I can't render that one hair on that one guy's bumcheek at FullHD. Woe is me.
>> [_] Anonymous 04/20/19(Sat)19:10:36 No.3388243
>>3388234
i still support AMD with their CPU.
if they can be competitive with their next line of graphics cards I'm all for it.
