File: Check'em.swf-(443 KB, 550x400, Loop)
[_] Anonymous 11/03/20(Tue)06:47:45 No.

  >>3444444

>> [_] Anonymous 11/03/20(Tue)08:37:41 No.

  We are formless. We are the very discipline and morality that Americans invoke so often. How can
  anyone hope to eliminate us? As long as this nation exists, so will we. Don't you know that our
  plans have your interests -- not ours -- in mind? The mapping of the human genome was completed
  early this century. As a result, the evolutionary log of the human race lay open to us. We
  started with genetic engineering, and in the end we succeeded in digitizing life itself.

>> [_] Anonymous 11/03/20(Tue)08:40:51 No.

  But there are things not covered by genetic information.

  Human memories, ideas. Culture. History. Genes don't contain any record of human history. Is it
  something that should not be passed on? Should that information be left at the mercy of nature?
  We've always kept records of our lives. Through words, pictures, symbols... from tablets to
  books... But not all the information was inherited by later generations. A small percentage of
  the whole was selected and processed, then passed on. Not unlike genes, really.

>> [_] Anonymous 11/03/20(Tue)08:43:29 No.

  But in the current, digitized world, trivial information is accumulating every second, preserved
  in all its triteness. Never fading, always accessible. Rumors about petty issues,
  misinterpretations, slander...All this junk data preserved in an unfiltered state, growing at an
  alarming rate. It will only slow down social progress, reduce the rate of evolution.

  You seem to think our plan is one of censorship. What we propose to do is not to control content,
  but to create context. The digital society furthers human flaws and selectively rewards
  development of convenient half-truths.

>> [_] Anonymous 11/03/20(Tue)08:45:20 No.

  Just look at the strange juxtapositions of morality around you.
  Billions spent on new weapons in order to humanely murder other humans.
  Rights of criminals are given more respect than the privacy of their victims.
  Although there are people suffering in poverty, huge donations are made to protect endangered
  species.
  Everyone grows up being told the same thing. Be nice to other people... But beat out the
  competition!
  You're special. Believe in yourself and you will succeed. But it's obvious from the start that
  only a few can succeed...

>> [_] Anonymous 11/03/20(Tue)08:47:35 No.

  You exercise your right to "freedom" and this is the result. All rhetoric to avoid conflict and
  protect each other from hurt. The untested truths spun by different interests to churn and
  accumulate in the sandbox of political correctness and value systems. Everyone withdraws into
  their own small gated community, afraid of a larger forum. They stay inside their little ponds
  leaking whatever "truth" suits them into the growing cesspool of society at large. The different
  cardinal truths neither clash nor mesh. No one is invalidated, but nobody is right. Not even
  natural selection can take place here. The world is being engulfed in "truth".

>> [_] Anonymous 11/03/20(Tue)08:49:05 No.

  And this is the way the world ends. Not with a bang, but a whimper.

>> [_] Anonymous 11/03/20(Tue)08:52:50 No.

  We're trying to stop that from happening. It's our responsibility as rulers. Just as in genetics,
  unnecessary information and memory must be filtered out to stimulate the evolution of the
  species. Who else could wade through the sea of garbage you people produce, retrieve valuable
  truths and even interpret their meaning for later generations?

  That's what it means to create context.

>> [_] Anonymous 11/03/20(Tue)13:44:01 No.

  Whats the name of this song again? I remember it from like 6+ years ago.

>> [_] Anonymous 11/03/20(Tue)15:05:11 No.

  >>3444472
  Skrillex - Dot Matrix Printer in a Washing Machine

>> [_] Anonymous 11/03/20(Tue)15:32:02 No.

  >>3444442
  >>3444441
  >>3444440
  >>3444439
  >>3444438
  >>3444436
  >>3444432
  STFU, ur boring af

>> [_] Anonymous 11/03/20(Tue)15:59:02 No.

  >>3444486
  I think he was just trying to get to the get.