File: press／f／.swf-(6.6 MB, 495x363, Loop)
[_] >why isn't /f/ more active Anonymous 07/31/22(Sun)07:11:39 No.3486051
>3486026
Marked for deletion (old).
>> [_] Anonymous 07/31/22(Sun)07:14:17 No.3486052
>>3486026
>> [_] Anonymous 07/31/22(Sun)08:49:04 No.3486057
Doing my best to breath some life into /f/
>> [_] Anonymous 07/31/22(Sun)19:02:53 No.3486093
>>3486051
havent browsed 4chan regularly since about 2018 and it sucks seeing how empty /f/ feels now
>> [_] Anonymous 07/31/22(Sun)21:04:25 No.3486097
Removal of native flash compatibility breaking old flashes
Flashes were more popular in the past because video sucked ass, which is sucks slightly less now
People who made flashes just release on Youtube now if they wanted to make something
I personally prefer the fluid feeling of flash files as opposed to rastered pixels, but it's all
ogre now, anon
>> [_] Anonymous 08/01/22(Mon)02:59:36 No.3486107
>>3486051
i would still be active on /f/ if i could actually still play flash files, tried a few third
party flash players but they dont seem to work on most files i'd like to play and when they do
actually do something theres a good 80% chance its still broken. flash gaming was my hobby up
until a few years ago, now i just mostly stare at a wall. i seen a few rumors of something about
loading up an old version of flash player from wayback machine and using some other browser
called waterfox or something but it all sounded pretty sketch and i havent looked into it
further, anybody doing that wants to comment i'd be interested in hearing about it.
>> [_] Anonymous 08/01/22(Mon)04:42:43 No.3486109
>>3486107
It's not the same but I like the standalone flash player a lot more than running outdated
browsers or using ruffle, especially for flash games. You can just copy paste the 4chan url and
play it locally.
I grabbed it from adobe just before they took it off their site so not sketch at all but those
are gone now. There are also versions of the standalone player on the internet archive and if you
don't trust them here's the sha512 of the x86_64 linux tar file: e67eedea0d09ae19dc9d4
d061ab9b803fcb60aae60738322e0d8ffd46b60e5bc00607bfd1244e6bd41a03d1b507860dc7d5bd2290
d5cf9f139f67427cebf5b6d
If you're on windows I dunno kys or something.
>> [_] Anonymous 08/01/22(Mon)04:53:16 No.3486110
>>3486107
The standalone player from waybackmachine is the best alternative I have come across.
>> [_] Anonymous 08/01/22(Mon)12:54:54 No.3486130
>>3486107
Here's a direct download to the standalone flash player for Windows. It doesn't have the
killswitch on it, so it should work on even the latest version of Windows. Just do like what >>3
486109
said and copy paste the /f/ URLs into the player.
https://www.snootanon.com/downloads/flashplayer_32_sa.exe
>> [_] Anonymous 08/01/22(Mon)13:53:46 No.3486131
>>3486107
you know not all browsers have flash support disabled
like I use pale moon and just open shit like I always have, no need for ruffle or standalone
flash players or anything
if you don't want to switch your browser entirely you could still just dl a different one solely
for the purpose of browsing /f/
>> [_] Anonymous 08/01/22(Mon)15:07:51 No.3486136
>>3486131
Seconding pale moon, shit just werks. Theres a post about it in the archive, why we don't have
this shit stickied is beyond me
>> [_] Anonymous 08/01/22(Mon)15:20:23 No.3486137
>>3486107
you can still install the adobe flash player on your system
should be fine if you sandbox it or dont care
>> [_] Anonymous 08/01/22(Mon)19:04:41 No.3486144
Im somwere on this time line
>> [_] Anonymous 08/01/22(Mon)19:10:59 No.3486145
>>3486130
Thank You for posting this link bro I can browse my swf colection again
>> [_] Anonymous 08/01/22(Mon)20:42:52 No.3486147
>>3486136
mods don't care about /f/
if they did they'd have a sticky or some better equivalent (like an announcement only up on /f/)
explaining methods of viewing swfs, from other browsers to ruffle etc
