File: bunker.swf-(517 KB, 800x600, Game)
[_] Anonymous 04/10/25(Thu)11:10:53 No.3524023
This is MY bunker. But you can stay.
Marked for deletion (old).
>> [_] Anonymous 04/10/25(Thu)12:48:00 No.3524027
I'm surprised this even half works in ruffle
>> [_] Anonymous 04/10/25(Thu)13:25:11 No.3524030
Where is sadam hussein?
>> [_] Anonymous 04/10/25(Thu)13:41:26 No.3524031
Compatible with Flash 9 by only using NATIVE 2D TRANSFORMS ON BITMAP FILLS!!! O_O
>> [_] Anonymous 04/10/25(Thu)13:52:28 No.3524032
>>3524027
>>3524031
to someone who only discovered that flash player still works thanks to this newfangled emulator
thing, can someone tell if it's even possible to use GPU rendering in it?
>> [_] Anonymous 04/10/25(Thu)13:53:30 No.3524033
>>3524032
>only discovered that flash player still works thanks to this newfangled emulator thing
*on the april fools event
>> [_] Anonymous 04/10/25(Thu)14:54:20 No.3524036
>>3524032
For vector graphics: No
For webGL stuff: Yes (but actually, most likely no)
>> [_] !bgvu1ECAmM 04/10/25(Thu)15:43:46 No.3524038
>>3524023
how the fuck did you do this in 517 kilobytes
>> [_] Anonymous 04/10/25(Thu)16:09:12 No.3524041
>>3524038
Check the archive. I'm not the creator. But I am the last remaining resident and therefore owner
of this place.
>> [_] Anonymous 04/10/25(Thu)17:02:46 No.3524043
amazing flash, only if it came with multiplayer capabilities.
>> [_] Anonymous 04/10/25(Thu)17:32:48 No.3524047
/f/ games catch the feeling of 20 years ago perfectly, even makes my computer as slow as back then
cool
>> [_] Anonymous 04/10/25(Thu)18:37:35 No.3524056
>>3524041
Do you know why the error "Invalid tag" occurs when you try to post a flash file? I thought maybe
it was the ExportAssets tags but the same thing happen when removing them.
>> [_] Anonymous 04/10/25(Thu)19:20:54 No.3524057
>>3524023
this is fucking cool
>> [_] Anonymous 04/10/25(Thu)19:22:53 No.3524058
Still not sure why it adds more triangles when standing still for a while, there are no round
things so it's not noticeable. No lightning either and changing texture smoothing shouldn't need
more triangles.
I remember there being one more of these flashes where you can go outside.
>> [_] Anonymous 04/10/25(Thu)19:28:48 No.3524059
>>3524058
found it:
http://eye.swfchan.com/flash.asp?id=49940&n=temple.swf
unrelated to this 3D engine, there's also quake 1 just to show that flash was pretty capable:
http://eye.swfchan.com/flash.asp?id=78826&n=Quake.swf
>> [_] Anonymous 04/10/25(Thu)19:32:36 No.3524060
>>3524058
Maybe it doesn't show all the triangles until you stand still?
>> [_] Anonymous 04/10/25(Thu)19:33:44 No.3524061
>>3524060
you're right, could be that
>> [_] Anonymous 04/10/25(Thu)20:20:35 No.3524063
>>3524056
Since I can not guess the intention behind your schizo babble, the only answer I can give you is
"no".
>> [_] Anonymous 04/10/25(Thu)21:33:27 No.3524067
>>3524063
You're bluffing. You know the inner workings of the flash format like the back of your hand.
Reveal us the truth old sensei.
>> [_] Anonymous 04/10/25(Thu)23:54:29 No.3524077
>>3524056
>>3524067
when you're uploading a flash file below is another option called Tag and you just got to choose
one
>> [_] Anonymous 04/11/25(Fri)01:14:31 No.3524084
i am a leftover tourist from april fools and i am still mystified by this board's culture
>> [_] Anonymous 04/11/25(Fri)01:53:32 No.3524085
>>3524023
This must've been awesome in 2004
>> [_] Anonymous 04/11/25(Fri)02:08:18 No.3524088
FROG BLAST THE VENT CORE
>> [_] Anonymous 04/11/25(Fri)02:19:12 No.3524089
LONG LIVE IRAN
>> [_] Anonymous 04/11/25(Fri)07:27:28 No.3524095
>>3524084
dsfargeg
>> [_] Anonymous 04/11/25(Fri)07:33:13 No.3524096
>>3524084
me to man
>> [_] Anonymous 04/11/25(Fri)08:02:03 No.3524097
>>3524077
lol was that what he was talking about?!
I thought it was an invalid data tag inside the swf file...
https://www.m2osw.com/swf_tags
>> [_] Anonymous 04/11/25(Fri)09:51:06 No.3524100
>>3524084
it seems to be mostly a time capsule of 2000s-early 2010s internet culture
wouldn't be confusing if you were on the internet back then, zoom zoom
>> [_] Anonymous 04/11/25(Fri)10:18:39 No.3524103
>>3524032
No, the flash architecture is pretty sequential and cannot really be accelerated by a gpu.
>> [_] Anonymous 04/11/25(Fri)10:23:15 No.3524104
>>3524041
I had it before you, liar.
>> [_] Anonymous 04/11/25(Fri)10:26:33 No.3524105
>>3524056
Upload the swf on litterbox.catbox.moe and share the link so we can take a look.
>>3524097
He is talking about an invalid tag inside the swf file.
>> [_] Anonymous 04/11/25(Fri)10:29:58 No.3524106
>>3524105
didn't think /f/ was advanced enough to check block tags inside swfs
>> [_] Anonymous 04/11/25(Fri)10:33:11 No.3524107
>>3524041
Do you know your reactor is green? Is not supposed to be green.
>> [_] Anonymous 04/11/25(Fri)10:36:47 No.3524109
>>3524106
It checks for general file validity and compression, and I have never seen an Invalid tag error
in year of posting, so why not?
>> [_] Anonymous 04/11/25(Fri)10:37:51 No.3524111
>>3524109
years*
>> [_] Anonymous 04/11/25(Fri)10:50:47 No.3524113
>>3524107
It runs on glowniggers. The color is perfectly fine.
>> [_] Anonymous 04/11/25(Fri)10:52:28 No.3524114
>>3524104
Oh? So are you man enough to fight me over the ownership?
>> [_] Anonymous 04/11/25(Fri)10:57:42 No.3524116
>>3524114
Bring it fagit
>> [_] Anonymous 04/11/25(Fri)11:05:42 No.3524118
>>3524116
It's on, nigger. It will be a highscore battle. Pick only one:
Marippy
Yamame Swing
Cirno Bottle Launch
beventlaed
red
>> [_] Anonymous 04/11/25(Fri)11:11:02 No.3524119
>>3524118
Sure, we'll play it on your terms. bring it on fagit.
Let's go with bottle launch.
>> [_] Anonymous 04/11/25(Fri)11:14:32 No.3524121
>>3524119
>>3524120
Get ready. And catbox your score for proof.
>> [_] Anonymous 04/11/25(Fri)11:24:32 No.3524123
>>3524077
lol, thanks I forgot about the category tag...
>>3524097
and thought it was a swf validation error. you get them sometimes with pictures and videos
good page btw, some of those tags aren't in the official spec
>> [_] Anonymous 04/11/25(Fri)14:00:12 No.3524143
>>3524123
>some of those tags aren't in the official spec
that can't be true, maybe you're looking at outdated docs
>> [_] Anonymous 04/11/25(Fri)14:54:21 No.3524147
>>3524143
>that can't be true, maybe you're looking at outdated docs
afaik the latest spec is "SWF FILE FORMAT SPECIFICATION VERSION 19". the tags appearing in the
webpage that don't appear in the swf spec v19 are:
3 FreeCharacter
25 PathsArePostscript
29 SyncFrame
31 FreeAll
38 Define Video
40 NameCharacter
41 ProductInfo
42 DefineTextFormat
47 GenerateFrame
49 GeneratorCommand
50 DefineCommanObject
51 CharacterSet
52 ExternalFont
63 DebugID
72 DoABCDefine
Even when accounting those there are still holes in list of tags.
>> [_] Anonymous 04/11/25(Fri)14:58:56 No.3524149
also I found 4 of those tags in the wild, including OP's file who contains a tag 41 (0x29).
