File[nickelback.swf] - (1.07 MB)
[_] [?] Anonymous 03/03/10(Wed)12:37 No.1198207
>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/10(Wed)12:51 No.1198218
what are you trying to prove, anon?
>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/10(Wed)12:59 No.1198219
>>1198218
Proving that NIckleback is a green band, they recycle.
>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/10(Wed)13:14 No.1198230
is the left speaker significantly higher in volume than the right? I end up listening to only the
left one.
>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/10(Wed)13:14 No.1198231
>>1198207
that guy on the left has a fucking gigantic forehead
>> [_] Anonamus-kun !!lszuV1omXqf 03/03/10(Wed)13:30 No.1198245
>>1198231
Rehashing tunes makes your hairline recede.
>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/10(Wed)13:35 No.1198249
Then they sued themselves for $4,000,000 canadian...or $10 American.
>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/10(Wed)13:52 No.1198259
>>1198219
ah thanks i didnt get it until now.
>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/10(Wed)14:32 No.1198283
i hate nickleback
>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/10(Wed)15:52 No.1198310
I knew i hated them for some reason
>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/10(Wed)17:22 No.1198378
I only like their animals song.
Nothing else.
>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/10(Wed)18:13 No.1198409
just because 2 songs have the same punctuation does not mean they are the same, I'm not a
nickleback fan, and haven't heard the right song before, but to me, they follow the same pattern,
but have a different chord structure and solo signatures...
>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/10(Wed)18:46 No.1198426
One has a higher volume and it's a superimposed similarity.
OP, fix the volume or you're bullshitting.
