File[Raaa raa raaa raa raaa.swf] - (5.37 MB)
[_] [L] Anonymous 05/04/10(Tue)13:00 No.1253432
So, you see, there are two infinities, one of integers and one of real numbers. The latter is
larger than the former.
Even though there are an infinite number of integers, keep counting, and you''ll eventually get
to any. This is not so with reals. Because there are an infinite number of real numbers in a
single integer, you can never progress past one.
Marked for deletion (old).
>> [_] Anonymous 05/04/10(Tue)13:07 No.1253434
your point?
>> [_] Anonymous 05/04/10(Tue)13:10 No.1253437
>>1253434
One never ending sequence can be larger than another never ending sequence.
>> [_] Anonymous 05/04/10(Tue)13:16 No.1253438
>>1253432
Yo dawg, I heard you like ∞, so I put a ℝ in your ℤ so you can infinitesimal while you infinite!
>> [_] Anonymous 05/04/10(Tue)16:27 No.1253580
>>1253438
thank you.. i wouldn't have been able to find the chars fast enough
>> [_] Anonymous 05/04/10(Tue)17:03 No.1253601
>>1253437
Actually, cardinality is defined by comparing injective mappings between sets. Because there is
no injective mapping from N to R, c > aleph naught
>> [_] Anonymous 05/04/10(Tue)17:12 No.1253608
What the fuck are you guys doing on /f/. Go invent a time machine or something you smart shits.