File[Mutilation Contrainte.swf] - (3.69 MB)
[_] [?] tinycat !!qoWPGZQ4oQc 08/05/10(Thu)12:18 No.

Marked for deletion (old).

>> [_] Anonymous 08/05/10(Thu)12:29 No.

  wtf

>> [_] Anonymous 08/05/10(Thu)13:20 No.

  what

>> [_] Anonymous 08/05/10(Thu)13:28 No.

  wat is this I don't even

>> [_] Anonymous 08/05/10(Thu)13:28 No.

  wow...
  powerful shit man

>> [_] Anonymous 08/05/10(Thu)13:33 No.

  wat..?

>> [_] Anonymous 08/05/10(Thu)13:54 No.

  emo shit!

>> [_] Anonymous 08/05/10(Thu)14:12 No.

  WHAT IS HAPPENING.'T EVEN KNOW ANYMORE!
  I DON

>> [_] Anonymous 08/05/10(Thu)14:15 No.

  someone has been playing too much Sacrier in Dofus

>> [_] loli 08/05/10(Thu)14:45 No.

  delicious flat chest

>> [_] Anonymous 08/05/10(Thu)15:21 No.

  Whoever made this has a serious clue...

>> [_] Anonymous 08/05/10(Thu)15:29 No.

  ...a raging clue if you ask me...

>> [_] Sage01 08/05/10(Thu)15:47 No.

  This is gay

>> [_] Zombie will eat your unhappyness. !TAJHyCgF.Y 08/05/10(Thu)15:50 No.

  HOLY FUCK THAT WAS AWESOME!
  She was possessed btw, for you idiots who don't get it.
  Not necessarily a spiritual possession, she seemed to be a psychological case, a Scritso with
  masochistic tendancys that became obsessive and controled her as visualized by the Red version of
  her. Self branding also serves to show that she's insane, as if the rampant self mutilation
  wasent enough to give that away.

>> [_] Anonymous 08/05/10(Thu)16:05 No.

  This was dumb...
  Shitty french metal. I'm not saying the french suck at metal, just that this person picked from
  the bottom of the heap here. There were better choices and he/she choose mediocrity over awesome.
  Why? we may never know.

  The visuals were deecent, not great, but okay. A little melodramatic. It went from a girl happy
  about her test straight to self mutilation and her stuffed animals yelling at her. There could've
  been more build to this, more foreshadowing, a little backstory perhaps. I want to know WHY she's
  cutting herself, and why her abdomen in particular.

  In short, this video could've had a lot more impact with a more subtle hand guiding it. As it is
  it just comes across as the same generic overdone emo bullshit we've all seen a million times.

>> [_] Anonymous 08/05/10(Thu)16:06 No.

  >>1338066
  TL;DR

  eat a dick, emo faggot

>> [_] tinycat !!qoWPGZQ4oQc 08/05/10(Thu)16:09 No.

  >>1338076
  stuffed animal was not yelling at her, that was her brother and she killed him.

  also at the end the her the red her is killing is her mother.

  then she jumps out the window and dies

>> [_] Anonymous 08/05/10(Thu)16:09 No.

  >>1338066
  What ever you said may be so but that doesn't mean its not lame.

>> [_] Anonymous 08/05/10(Thu)16:18 No.

  Schizophrenia doesn't have anything to do with being possessed or any kind of split
  personality/character,
  this is what stupid people and especially stupid emos always fuck up and wrong out,

  i hate it when wannabe "cool" idiots (emos) try acting smart with medical terms without knowing
  jack shit about it.

>> [_] Anonymous 08/05/10(Thu)16:18 No.

  >>1338084
  This get's explained at the end instead of hinted at in the beginning? This is why I didn't watch
  it all the way through. That and the music was assfucking terrible. It was as if my ears were
  being raped by a sweaty frenchman. How does the intro have anything to do with the supposed
  central theme of this composition?

  It starts off with her coming home from school with a good grade, then immediately goes for the
  gore. Is it supposed to be more shocking for the contrast? If so, the music kind of ruined that.
  So did the title. Something like "Secrets" or "Guilt" would've alluded to the topic without
  revealing too much of the story. as it is I got halfway through waiting for the story to engage
  me before I realized that this was it. There is no revelation, there is no impact. It is like
  performing surgery with a sledgehammer. It should have been a thought provoking short film.
  Instead it was turned into something Uwe Boll would be proud of.

>> [_] Anonymous 08/05/10(Thu)16:18 No.

  i couldn't watch more than 2 seconds of it before i fell asleep

>> [_] tinycat !!qoWPGZQ4oQc 08/05/10(Thu)16:21 No.

  its definitely not something you watch several times, but why are you commenting on something if
  you did not watch the whole thing?

>> [_] Anonymous 08/05/10(Thu)16:31 No.

  >>1338095
  And before you get all uppity with "It's an animated movie done by an amateur, it's not supposed
  to be the Godfather!", Fuck you. This person considers him/herself to be an artist. They wrote,
  drew, animated, and put music to this in an effort to create art. A piece with which they hoped
  to emotionally impact the viewer. They failed.

  I am explaining the flaws in the hopes that they will learn something about writing and
  composition before they try again. If you want impact, you need subtlety. You need to allude, to
  alert the mind in small indirect ways, to draw attention to the focal theme. You don't just yell
  "THIS IS WHAT IT'S ABOUT! LOOK! THIS RIGHT HERE!". If you want shock value, then you need the
  entire atmosphere of the film to go from one extreme to another. Music has a lot to do with this.
  If you had named the film something less obvious and started with something calm and
  lighthearted, then twisted it halfway in, it would've created a lot more tension.

>> [_] tinycat !!qoWPGZQ4oQc 08/05/10(Thu)16:35 No.

  >>1338112
  what a faggot, you did not even watch the whole thing and you pretend to know what sort of pacing
  it had or what its even really about.

>> [_] Anonymous 08/05/10(Thu)16:37 No.

  >>1338116
  And you are an emo faggot. Therefore your arguments are invalid. Good day sir.

>> [_] Sage01 08/05/10(Thu)16:41 No.

  >>1338116
  GTFO summerfag

  This man has legit complains and not once have you refuted it, you don't have to watch the last
  30 secs of a "film" to noticed it tries to hard to have emotional appeal, nor to notice the
  pacing is about as subtle as a rhino raping your anus

>> [_] tinycat !!qoWPGZQ4oQc 08/05/10(Thu)16:46 No.

  >>1338118
  im not the one coming into a thread writing huge replies about why a flash sucks while admitting
  i did not even watch it. you have no argument

>> [_] Sage01 08/05/10(Thu)16:50 No.

  >>1338132
  Please explain to us then how the pacing was as immaculate as you say.

  Checkmate emo douchebag

>> [_] tinycat !!qoWPGZQ4oQc 08/05/10(Thu)16:56 No.

  >>1338122
  'summerfag', god damn what a bunch of newbie faggots we have going around here.

  over half of what happens in the flash happens in the last few seconds, you dont even realize
  what has happened while watching it, you have to think about it after its over.

  Some immature cunt who doesnt like the music comes up with some weak criticism about the first
  few seconds not fitting his view of what a 'deep' flash 'film' should be.. what the fuck, "flash
  film?" seriously? what are you some sort of super serious professional 'flash artist' who has
  vast MONTHS LOL of experience coming here to criticize something to feel better about yourself?.
  This is an old flash, it was probably on the internet before you were.

>> [_] Anonymous 08/05/10(Thu)16:58 No.

  >>1338135
  " Although the film itself and its immaculate pacing keeps us believing that his love is real –
  it is impossible to be intellectually honest with oneself and come to that conclusion"
  -Jordan Hiller

  "The pacing is immaculate, the sound design chilling perfection. A masterpiece."
  -Chris Garcia

  "Her pacing is immaculate; the performances almost without exception bring out every ounce of
  Synge's rare and lasting passion"
  -David Lohrey

>> [_] Anonymous 08/05/10(Thu)16:59 No.

  >>1338132
  Did you read my posts? I lost interest after it zoomed in on angry bear for a third fricken time.
  It overstated itself. It droned on and on. It was the visual equivalent of white noise. But sure,
  I'll watch it all the way through. I'll give it a shot.

  Ya, I still think it sucks. I'm sorry, but this is utter shit. Justify and rationalize it however
  you want. This movie took itself so seriously while having absolutely no idea how to do so. It is
  clumsy, almost thuggish in it's execution. I hate you even for making me watch it all the way
  through.

>> [_] Anonymous 08/05/10(Thu)17:00 No.

  this is just the kind of crap you'd expect summerfags to like

>> [_] Anonymous 08/05/10(Thu)17:01 No.

  ITT: Faggotry.

>> [_] Anonymous 08/05/10(Thu)17:02 No.

  >>1338146
  "even more". Wow, I honestly think this thing killed a part of my brain. Again, fuck you buddy.

>> [_] Anonymous 08/05/10(Thu)17:03 No.

  >>1338149

  well, since you are here i guess that makes you a general part of it

  You dun goof'd

>> [_] tinycat !!qoWPGZQ4oQc 08/05/10(Thu)17:04 No.

  >>1338146
  It was timing itself to the music.

  also list the key events as they happen then.

>> [_] Anonymous 08/05/10(Thu)17:06 No.

  wow what a shock she escaped being killed by suiciding, it's just like i'm playing a multiplayer
  fps

>> [_] Anonymous 08/05/10(Thu)17:09 No.

  >>1338155
  gay crap with cutting, then bear, then bear is her brother (OH NOES), then her evil self and some
  other selves appear but the animator sucks at expressing what they mean so you're left with a
  vague feeling of maybe they're her ego or id or some psychobabble, then her evil self tries to
  kill her (YIKES!), her mom comes up and serves her EVIL SOUP OMG and somehow one of those extra
  girls looks normal and then it goes back to stab attack and then she jumps out the window and now
  she's in hell because suicide is frowned upon by raptor jesus. also some shitty music plays in
  the background

>> [_] Anonymous 08/05/10(Thu)17:12 No.

  >>1338155
  Girl gives test to parents to bad french metal.
  Girl goes upstairs, let the cutting begin.
  Bear is watching.
  Bear tries to stop girl.
  Girl goes nuts, starts stabbing bear.
  Bear morphs back and forth between bear and brother.
  Mom brings tea.
  Girl snaps completely and red(bad girl) stabs the girl.
  Girl is possibly the mother.
  Girl throws self out of second story window (which would only cause broken bones, and if she
  ragdolled, very little internal injury)
  End.

  About as subtle as a sledge and as deep as rain slicked pavement. Once more I must say, Fuck you
  and the horse you rode in on.

>> [_] Anonymous 08/05/10(Thu)17:13 No.

  i hope tinycat didn't make it because i'd hate to know he has downs syndrome

>> [_] Anonymous 08/05/10(Thu)17:18 No.

  Tinycat, suicide is not the answer. But you should still try it anyway.

>> [_] ??? 08/05/10(Thu)17:18 No.

  I don't think anyone here can say ANYTHING. No one (including me) knows what the hell they're
  talking about, so stop trying to label the animation. Besides, art is perceptive. Everyone sees
  is in a different light (some take is seriously, some don't).
  In my opinion (not that it matters) I think it was good, it just did a semi bad job at telling
  the story, but this thing gave me an idea for a story to work on, so I'm gonna go do that.

>> [_] tinycat !!qoWPGZQ4oQc 08/05/10(Thu)17:22 No.

  >>1338162
  Thats not it at all, you are looking at it like this is supposed to illustrate a specific story,
  it doesn't. Its full of symbolism, you can construct several possible stories based off of what
  you see, the only thing they have in common, and what the flash is actually illustrating, is the
  shared theme behind all of them.

  Certain things in the flash have to be taken as symbolism no matter what story you decide to go
  with.

  This is one of those 'horse with no name' things that does not have a definite meaning. Its
  brilliance is in the meanings it allows you to construct based off of the symbolism it gives you.

  Ive constructed three potential scenarios already, one has no violence in it at all. They all
  share the same meaning however.

  The thing however, is that everything is accounted for. The fact that you have no idea, no
  picture of whats going on but just see random crap means you aren't even really thinking about
  the flash.

>> [_] tinycat !!qoWPGZQ4oQc 08/05/10(Thu)17:23 No.

  >>1338167
  i got this off of /f/ a long time ago.

>> [_] Anonymous 08/05/10(Thu)17:28 No.

  That was a hell of an EMO :)

>> [_] Anonymous 08/05/10(Thu)17:29 No.

  >Its full of symbolism, you can construct several possible stories based off of what you see

  Ethos - Pathos - Logos.
  It's not the viewer's job to construct a story, it's the artist's job, and if it hasn't been done
  then the artist has failed, not the viewer.

>> [_] Anonymous 08/05/10(Thu)17:29 No.

  >>1338179
  this is just depressing...

>> [_] Anonymous 08/05/10(Thu)17:31 No.

  >>1338179

  What you're doing is basically mental masturbation. You can look at a bag of potato chips and
  just as easily come up with multiple scenarios to explain them and account for all the evidence
  before you. It does not mean that the bag of potato chips was made by a talented or "brilliant"
  artist.

>> [_] tinycat !!qoWPGZQ4oQc 08/05/10(Thu)17:32 No.

  >>1338186
  You're kidding right? Art does not exist until its observed by the viewers, its just a bunch of
  crap until then. Artists have no idea what art is. Creators of a thing have no valid opinion on
  what it is, because their understanding of it is wrapped up in the understanding of its creation,
  not in what it, itself, is. Good art is an accident.

  But thats not even the case here because the creator clearly had some goals, like i said the
  actual 'sense' you get at the conclusion of each version of the story is the same, its that
  abstract understanding that is the purpose, how you got there doesn't mean anything.

>> [_] Anonymous 08/05/10(Thu)17:34 No.

  this was total shit, a waste of time

>> [_] Anonymous 08/05/10(Thu)17:37 No.

  >>1338179
  oh yeah, now i see, i can make a story where tinycat is both the little boy and the little girl
  getting stabbed

>> [_] Anonymous 08/05/10(Thu)17:40 No.

  Leonardo Da Vinci: I are painting pretty lady and smiling i wunder if people will leik it lolz

>> [_] Anonymous 08/05/10(Thu)17:40 No.

  >Art does not exist until its observed by the viewers, its just a bunch of crap until then.

  So by your definition, literally anything in the entire universe that anybody appreciates in any
  way at all is "Art," you've effectively stripped the word of any meaning at all.

  I hereby declare that there will be a new word to replace the one that you've destroyed. The word
  will represent the product of a person endeavoring to create a quality, production, expression,
  or realm, according to aesthetic principles of what is beautiful, appealing, or of more than
  ordinary significance.

  The new word will be "Art," and the old word "Art" will be replaced with the word "Crap."

  Thereby, this flash is not art, but it is crap.

>> [_] Anonymous 08/05/10(Thu)17:43 No.

  Van Gogh: OH DAMN nite sky is purty maybe i draw swirlies and fun stuff and it looks good? but i
  dont now bcuz i am teh drawer and not objection

>> [_] Anonymous 08/05/10(Thu)17:46 No.

  Michaelangelo: Oh fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck... I don't know what to paint here... Why did I have
  to take this stupid job, anyway. That durned Pope is trying to set me up for failure. Maybe if I
  just draw a bunch of people doing, like, religious stuff he'll maybe at least pay me half the
  commission...

>> [_] tinycat !!qoWPGZQ4oQc 08/05/10(Thu)17:47 No.

  >>1338195
  There are a number of inconsistencies in the flash and things that you need to look at.
  1. Pay close attention to whos eyes you see and when, and whos eyes you can not see and when
  2. Thats a small room, her brother probably is not actually in there
  3. If he was, then there is no way that the mom would have walked in and not noticed.
  4. Why does the flash go so much out of its way to establish the normalcy of the girl/her
  life/her family before she gets to her room?
  5. When her mom comes there is no way she could have cleaned up all that mess, so either it was
  not actually there, or what the flash shows you in that part is not what is really happening in
  that part.

  The flash could be about survivors guilt, her brother is already dead. Shes not actually cutting
  herself, its a metaphor.

>> [_] Anonymous 08/05/10(Thu)17:47 No.

  >>1338190
  The sense is this, "mental illness is a confusing a tragic experience for those who suffer from
  it. What is real and what is fantasy are often so jumbled that the one can rarely be
  differentiated from the other, sometimes with catastrophic results".

  Wait, sorry, the sense I'm getting is "This guy is obviously trying to portray a paranoid
  schizophrenic episode with no actual knowledge of the disorder. I'm guessing he listens to too
  much black metal and screamo and is a rabid Jonen Vasquez fan".

  It's all in the interpretation. Either way, shitty music is shitty.

>> [_] Anonymous 08/05/10(Thu)17:49 No.

  >>1338205
  OMG IT ALL MAKES SENSE NOW!!! I CAN'T SEE MY OWN EYES!!

  Oh, wait, a mirror...flash sucks

>> [_] Anonymous 08/05/10(Thu)17:50 No.

  Could have been better executed.

>> [_] tinycat !!qoWPGZQ4oQc 08/05/10(Thu)17:51 No.

  >>1338197
  Artists can only make art for other artists, if non artists like it or not is entirely up to
  chance. Ive been a musician for 15 years, i can appreciate music in ways other people cant, but
  the way that most people listen to music is forever lost for me now. I cant just hear the sound,
  i have to hear the music.

  This means that i have no real authority to say if music is good or not, i can only say if it is
  musically interesting.

  Its the same for any creator.

  Since art is generally meant to be consumed by the layperson the judgment of artists is not valid
  for judging art.

>> [_] Anonymous 08/05/10(Thu)17:53 No.

  >>1338209
  >>I am better than anyone else because I hear music.

>> [_] Anonymous 08/05/10(Thu)17:56 No.

  >>1338209

  lol, why are you an idiot ?

>> [_] tinycat !!qoWPGZQ4oQc 08/05/10(Thu)17:56 No.

  >>1338211
  No actually i said pretty much the opposite of that

>> [_] Anonymous 08/05/10(Thu)17:59 No.

  >>1338209
  the logic here is that anyone who's a real artist has no sense of what's good or bad art

>> [_] Anonymous 08/05/10(Thu)18:01 No.

  OMFG this shit was so stupid. seems like a failed attempt to fish for an emotional response by
  showing cartoon gore. im not impressed.

>> [_] tinycat !!qoWPGZQ4oQc 08/05/10(Thu)18:02 No.

  >>1338216
  correct, they only have a sense of whats good or bad technique

>> [_] Anonymous 08/05/10(Thu)18:02 No.

  Idiots talk too much trying to act smart,
  tinycat, you are an idiot, and you are the weakest link, good night

>> [_] Anonymous 08/05/10(Thu)18:03 No.

  this is absolute shit

>> [_] tinycat !!qoWPGZQ4oQc 08/05/10(Thu)18:04 No.

  >>1338222
  you say that after being the first one to start typing multi-paragraph responses in this thread
  (i know its you, only you would try and blow things off with generic one liners)

>> [_] Anonymous 08/05/10(Thu)18:05 No.

  >>1338225

  no, i say that after just coming on /f/ and reading through all this shit in this thread

  and yes, your samefag detector is busted

>> [_] Anonymous 08/05/10(Thu)18:06 No.

  >>1338225
  you say that not realizing that a lot of anonymous use noko in the other boards and it autofills
  when you go to a new board

>> [_] Anonymous 08/05/10(Thu)18:08 No.

  wtf is this retarded flash

>> [_] tinycat !!qoWPGZQ4oQc 08/05/10(Thu)18:09 No.

  >>1338229
  Why are you saying that? I even gave my reasoning in the very thread you are pointing to as to
  why i know what i know, and it does not have noko anywhere in it. I have noko in my email field
  this very moment.

  You guys seriously lack awareness, and just jump to conclusions, no wonder you dont get the flash.

>> [_] Anonymous 08/05/10(Thu)18:11 No.

  >>1338234
  theres nothing to get. the art is a fucking mess. if you like that shit because it makes your
  dick hard, good for you. the rest of us think its shit.

>> [_] Anonymous 08/05/10(Thu)18:11 No.

  >>1338225
  Actually, I left for about twenty minutes to have a shower before heading out tonight. That's an
  entirely new guy. Nice to see the thread is still generating discussion concerning art and it's
  interpretation. Last post from me, honest. I agree with the guy who said that it's the
  responsibility of the artist to lead you to the correct interpretation of his intended message.
  If he fails to do so, it is because he failed to properly do so. anywho, have a good one. Glad to
  see my paragraph long responses spawned such a heated debate.

>> [_] Anonymous 08/05/10(Thu)18:13 No.

  >>1338234

  ok tripfag of awesumness, let me forward your seemingly fried brain towards something

  this :
  >>1338228
  >>1338222
  >>1338214

  is all me, and thats about all of me savy ?

  and you are trying to act smart over something neither you nor anyone else can understand unless
  they fused their brains with the maker of this flash.

  Now please stop feeding this crap with even more crappier crap that you crap out, savy ?

>> [_] tinycat !!qoWPGZQ4oQc 08/05/10(Thu)18:14 No.

  >>1338238
  actually i think its too long, which is why i said "its definitely not something you watch
  several times" above. I thought it was neat though, and better than another random hentai dress
  up flash

  im only posting here because pretentious twat decided to be a 'flash film critic' on 4chan while
  admitting he did not even watch it.

>> [_] Anonymous 08/05/10(Thu)18:15 No.

  >>1338234
  excuse me are you retarded?

>> [_] Anonymous 08/05/10(Thu)18:16 No.

  hey tinycar don't ever make another flash plz

>> [_] Anonymous 08/05/10(Thu)18:17 No.

  >>1338207
  this.

>> [_] Anonymous 08/05/10(Thu)18:17 No.

  >>1338245

  apparently so, but don't go swearing please,
  i heard retards get super offended by that word and start replying in hundreds of posts trying to
  defend what dignity they don't have aka don't feed the troll

>> [_] Anonymous 08/05/10(Thu)18:19 No.

  This is shit

>> [_] Anonymous 08/05/10(Thu)18:20 No.

  not enough pedo bear

>> [_] tinycat !!qoWPGZQ4oQc 08/05/10(Thu)18:21 No.

  >>1338241
  >you nor anyone else can understand unless they fused their brains with the maker of this flash.

  no, because what was intended has nothing to do with it.

  >>1338240
  >I agree with the guy who said that it's the responsibility of the artist to lead you to the
  correct interpretation of his intended message.

  You are operating under the assumption that everyone thinks the same, they dont. Art is about the
  abstract, the only way you could ensure people get what the artist 'intends' is if the artist
  just tells you what he intended.

  Look at what >>1338196
  said, there is an example. One of the most famous pieces of art in the world, people are still to
  this day trying to figure out what it actually means.

  its good BECAUSE people can not say definitely what it means.

>> [_] Anonymous 08/05/10(Thu)18:21 No.

  tinycat your flash sucks

>> [_] Anonymous 08/05/10(Thu)18:23 No.

  I kept watching in the hopes that there would be something decent but it was just pretentious
  shit with horrible french metal.

>> [_] tinycat !!qoWPGZQ4oQc 08/05/10(Thu)18:28 No.

  >>1338255
  this flash is 5 years old, i got it on /f/ years ago, it was well received then, i found it on my
  hard drive. I posted it, it all went well until people started posting more than one line replies.

>> [_] Anonymous 08/05/10(Thu)18:32 No.

  >>1338267

  >wtf
  >what
  >wat..?
  >emo shit!
  >someone has been playing too much Sacrier in Dofus
  >Whoever made this has a serious clue...
  >...a raging clue if you ask me...
  >This is gay

  Your argument is invalid, now fuck off triptroll and buy new glasses

>> [_] tinycat !!qoWPGZQ4oQc 08/05/10(Thu)18:33 No.

  >>1338271
  those are all glorious replies.

>> [_] Anonymous 08/05/10(Thu)18:35 No.

  >>1338275

  then why are you buggering over why the flash sucks ???

>> [_] tinycat !!qoWPGZQ4oQc 08/05/10(Thu)18:42 No.

  >>1338278
  it has nothing to do with the flash, i just do not like >>1338076

  For starters we later find out he did not even watch the entire flash. But in his original post,
  his only real points was

  1. he did not like the music (i thought it fit fairly interestingly, it sounded rather BOCish,
  which fits in with 'weird stuff')

  2. He complained there was no backstory... its a flash.. an already longer than it probably
  should be flash.. he wants it to be even longer explaining a bunch of stuff to set it up?

  It was at this point i realized that i just plain did not like him.

>> [_] Bixy !LDt0ikDqhM!!60RF7p3/Emf 08/05/10(Thu)18:48 No.

  OH GOD WHAT IS GOING ON IN HERE?!

>> [_] Anonymous 08/05/10(Thu)18:49 No.

  >>1338287

  1. If he didn't watch the flash he wouldn't know the music

  2. He doesn't want it longer, what he really wants is some order in the flash that simplifies the
  understanding

  3. I find it pitiful that you are struck by nothing less than a matter of opinion and even more
  pitiful that you have to drag the whole shit over this whole thread instead of doing what any
  smart man in the history of humanity did : ignore

  ignore or be an idiot, you chose the second,
  next time choose the first option and ignore,
  and please start by ignoring this post and not replying, ignoring can get you far in life

>> [_] Anonymous 08/05/10(Thu)18:50 No.

  Horrible french power metal bullshit.

  Stupid angsty teen flash subject matter.

  Decent flash animation however.

  2/10

>> [_] Ugh Anonymous 08/05/10(Thu)18:54 No.

  Don't ever make another flash tinycat

>> [_] ??? 08/05/10(Thu)18:56 No.

  >>1338293
  Are you kidding? A 2/10?

  I'd give this flash a 8/10. True, it was a little messy, but it gave me quite a bit to think
  about afterwards. It makes you look at your life differently! I bitch and complain about
  everything! But I'm not gonna stop bitching (I love complaining!!!), I'll just keep in mind that
  other people have worse problems than I do.

>> [_] tinycat !!qoWPGZQ4oQc 08/05/10(Thu)18:56 No.

  >>1338292
  read the thread, he watched the first minute or so of it then decided to write a series of posts
  criticizing it. That single fact alone should be all the evidence needed to discredit him.

  Why respond? Well obviously, because it keeps the thread bumped.

>> [_] Anonymous 08/05/10(Thu)18:59 No.

  >>1338301

  the point of bumping threads is to stop them from going into pages apart from the first one and
  to be seen on the first page by a majority of users,

  seeing as /f/ only has one page in which every flash rests at least for 5 hours..... you are an
  idiot

  >facepalm.jpg/gif/png

>> [_] Anonymous 08/05/10(Thu)18:59 No.

  tinycat's flashes suck

>> [_] ??? 08/05/10(Thu)19:00 No.

  >>1338301
  Dude, If he didn't get it, THEN HE DIDN'T GET IT!!! Let it go!!!
  If you're mad, go masturbate or play a videogame! Do something to relieve stress, and quit
  harping on the little bastard cuz he's closeminded! You're just wasting your time!

>> [_] tinycat !!qoWPGZQ4oQc 08/05/10(Thu)19:00 No.

  >>1338306
  an idiot with a 100 reply thread on /f/

>> [_] Anonymous 08/05/10(Thu)19:02 No.

  God damn it. i came here for some mindless hatred and crapy flashes, and what do i find? A
  philosophical argument. /f/ you disappoint me.

>> [_] Anonymous 08/05/10(Thu)19:03 No.

  tinycat why did you have to go to France to get shitty metal? The US makes tons of shitty metal
  that you could have used.

>> [_] Anonymous 08/05/10(Thu)19:03 No.

  >>1338310

  a 100 reply thread in which 90% of replies are sustained of you showing off and trolls proving
  that you are an idiot for not knowing to ignore as well as attention whore,

  congratulations, numbers =/= quality in many cases and you are on the watch list probably already

>> [_] Anonymous 08/05/10(Thu)19:04 No.

  >>1338310

  u mad

>> [_] Anonymous 08/05/10(Thu)19:05 No.

  I liked the part where the flash didn't have bad musiOH WAIT IT DID HAVE BAD MUSIC

>> [_] Anonymous 08/05/10(Thu)19:06 No.

  hey did anyone else see that mug? that was an awesome mug. where do you think i could get a mug
  like that?

>> [_] tinycat !!qoWPGZQ4oQc 08/05/10(Thu)19:08 No.

  >>1338314
  >you showing off
  huh?

  As far as trolls, while im sure some people are trolls, trolls are dangerous in that they present
  an idea, and the impressionable minds that may wander in could see those ideas, and not being met
  with a response, assume them to be legitimate.

  I, in my benevolence, must ensure my threads have due response to all postings

>> [_] ??? 08/05/10(Thu)19:09 No.

  >>1338321
  Wal-Mart?

>> [_] Anonymous 08/05/10(Thu)19:09 No.

  >>1338323
  One can only hope

>> [_] Anonymous 08/05/10(Thu)19:10 No.

  >>1338322

  you in your benevolence should stop posting, because you are seriously going full retard here,

  and might i add that this would be a humongous benevolence

>> [_] Anonymous 08/05/10(Thu)19:10 No.

  how could tinycat be a musician for 15 years old when his posts obviously show he is 14?

>> [_] Anonymous 08/05/10(Thu)19:13 No.

  mug - Google Search
  About 26,800,000 results
  ...this is gonna take awhile

>> [_] tinycat !!qoWPGZQ4oQc 08/05/10(Thu)19:14 No.

  >>1338325
  >going full retard
  see when you use terms like that its just hard for me to take you seriously =/

  Every now and then i wonder if maybe people are right, but then they say something that reassures
  me that im right instead.

>> [_] Anonymous 08/05/10(Thu)19:16 No.

  so much butthurt

>> [_] Anonymous 08/05/10(Thu)19:21 No.

  >>1338330

  >terms like that

  this term is as descriptive of you as can be,
  and if you disprove certain terms because they are widely used for their descriptive nature
  towards the quoted person,
  then you really are a retard,
  and no, in no post whatsoever have you been right, because there isn't such a thing as a 100%
  right argument (there is no such thing as perfection) which is only another thing that proves you
  are retarded in your thinking,

  i come to the observation that you are underage trying to use a wide vocabulary to seem smart
  (which does the opposite in your case) and a troll for obvious reasons seen in the last 30 posts,

  so i bid thee farewell, and leave the rest of the work to the mods, or rather the mod that is
  taking the shift in about half an hour

  cheerio

>> [_] tinycat !!qoWPGZQ4oQc 08/05/10(Thu)19:24 No.

  >>1338334
  >because there isn't such a thing as a 100% right argument (there is no such thing as perfection)
  which is only another thing that proves you are retarded in your thinking,

  lol, and you call me underage, that sounds like some annoying first year philosophy major trying
  to be deep. 'nothing is knowable'

  The beige boards really have gone down hill.

>> [_] Anonymous 08/05/10(Thu)19:29 No.

  "The man standing with the last word in a argument, is always the man begging for a rematch to
  his own failure."

>> [_] tinycat !!qoWPGZQ4oQc 08/05/10(Thu)19:31 No.

  >>1338344
  nice try

>> [_] George Zimmer !!IYmoTiYa3ke 08/05/10(Thu)19:37 No.

  >100+ replies

  OH LAWDY

>> [_] ??? !eHg13QwJnI 08/05/10(Thu)19:40 No.

  Don't mind me, just tryin' somthing out....

>> [_] Anonymous 08/05/10(Thu)19:44 No.

  music source?

>> [_] Anonymous 08/05/10(Thu)19:48 No.

  >samefag bumping a shit flash

>> [_] Anonymous 08/05/10(Thu)19:50 No.

  has anyone found that mug yet?

>> [_] Anonymous 08/05/10(Thu)19:51 No.

  personally i have trouble comprehending how a person could turn out like that IRL.