File[ohmy.swf] - (7.18 MB)
[_] [H] needs more /f/ur Anonymous 10/01/10(Fri)12:39 No.1386655
i mean, it is friday
Marked for deletion (old).
>> [_] Anonymous 10/01/10(Fri)12:53 No.1386663
dat second life
>> [_] Anonymous 10/01/10(Fri)13:43 No.1386678
I like how in the first shot the avatar is clearly missing a hand/paw
>> [_] Anonymous 10/01/10(Fri)13:58 No.1386682
>>1386678
Whatever gets you off, anon.
>> [_] Anonymous 10/01/10(Fri)14:13 No.1386686
>>1386682
fuck yeah amputees
>> [_] Anonymous 10/01/10(Fri)14:17 No.1386687
eww
>> [_] Anonymous 10/01/10(Fri)14:51 No.1386697
EXTERMINATUS! SUFFER NOT THE FURRY TO LIVE!
>> [_] Anonymous 10/01/10(Fri)15:25 No.1386706
Not all gay shit is stupid and furry. But all furry shit is stupid and gay.
>> [_] :3 FurFan !!ITx6Th3pbEj 10/01/10(Fri)17:08 No.1386748
>>1386706
> all furry shit is stupid and gay.
Know that. Still love it, though. =3
>> [_] Anonymous 10/01/10(Fri)17:11 No.1386751
Now why would somebody fuck animals?
I can understand pedos, being turned on by little girls. I mean, it's pushing it, but still based
on the instinct of reproduction even if gone slightly wrong. But being turned on by golden
retriever puppies? Fuck no, you are shit and you should burn in a fire forever. Like, maybe have
your brains placed in a vat and your pain centers stimulated until they turn into mush.
>> [_] Anonymous 10/01/10(Fri)17:19 No.1386755
>>1386751
newfag
>> [_] Anonymous 10/01/10(Fri)17:20 No.1386756
>>1386751
YES
I CANNOT AGREE WITH YOU MORE
>> [_] Anonymous 10/01/10(Fri)17:33 No.1386761
>>1386755
Seriously? Your argument is to call people who say people who want to fuck squirrels should burn
in a fire "newfags"? I actually feel somewhat sorry for you, in the way that you would feel sorry
for somebody that has HIV-infected brain cancer, so I'm going to give you some time to come up
with something better.
>> [_] Anonymous 10/01/10(Fri)17:45 No.1386765
>>1386761
Hahaha, furries aren't people who want to fuck animals. They want to fuck animal PEOPLE.~
>> [_] Anonymous 10/01/10(Fri)17:46 No.1386769
>>1386765
>implying giving it opposable thumbs makes it "non-animal"
Anyone can identify the things in this video to be animals, despite their anthropomorphic hands.
Your argument is invalid.
>> [_] Anonymous 10/01/10(Fri)17:53 No.1386770
i think i just saw a glimpse of my personal hell
>> [_] Tite Kubo™ !!jZZmNaCZ/1M 10/01/10(Fri)17:57 No.1386771
I used to like fridays
>> [_] Anonymous 10/01/10(Fri)18:45 No.1386785
>>1386751
>>1386761
>>1386769
>intentional logical fallacies
>> [_] Anonymous 10/01/10(Fri)19:12 No.1386797
Needs more /f/urry, yes.
NOT /F/UR/F/AGGOTRY
GODDAMMIT, IF IT'S GONNA BE FURRY, KEEP IT HETERO OR YURI.
Also, why don't haters ever bother with the concept of niggerpissing "SUSPENSION OF DISBELIEF!?"
>> [_] Anonymous 10/01/10(Fri)19:13 No.1386799
Why can't you faggots go back to fchan?
>> [_] Anonymous 10/01/10(Fri)19:15 No.1386802
>>1386797
Actually, I can answer my own question:
By engaging suspension of disbelief, this deprives haters of their argument, as well as forcing
them all to do something they are very, very out-of-practice with: THINKING.
They all just prefer to vomit out a bunch of predigested slop in the form of the same old, tired,
worn-out, repetitive trollphrases.
>> [_] Anonymous 10/01/10(Fri)19:19 No.1386806
>>1386802
What? What disbelief exactly should we suspend? Disbelief that these aren't animals that you
would like to fuck? For your information, sir, we would like to. Oh god how we would. It's just
that you're making it so blatantly obvious suspension of disbelief can no longer be maintained.
>> [_] Anonymous 10/01/10(Fri)19:39 No.1386816
secondlife sux
