File[IQ_tester.swf] - (816 KB)
[_] [G] Everyone get out your e-penis Obs !!K9tXyOcGoN3 09/22/10(Wed)03:20 No.

  It's time to measure.

  128, literary.

Marked for deletion (old).

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)03:30 No.

  137
  semi-guiness yay

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)03:31 No.

  genius * my bad

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)03:32 No.

  128

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)03:36 No.

  149 .-.

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)03:39 No.

  http://img811.imageshack.us/img811/6537/69561316.png

  I'm sorry, I can't hear you over the sound of how smart I am.

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)03:40 No.

  well I spammed the first one which came up everytime and got 122.
  you failures.

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)03:46 No.

  130 literary

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)03:52 No.

  this iq test is horrible, my IQ is not 138. Also, cory in the house...lol.

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)03:52 No.

  >>1379075

  you're so smart that u didnt like your IQ but linked a consolation image that everyone gets

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)03:55 No.

  >>1379085
  You're so smart you didn't see the IQ in the top left corner.

  And also can't spell you.

>> [_] OP 09/22/10(Wed)03:55 No.

  >Mensa (organisation of intelligent people)

  lolololololololol

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)04:03 No.

  >>1379075

  >It means you are great at determining logic and maths

  >maths

  This IQ test is undoubtedly valid.

  Also, 141 Literary. I think that's just because I got all the vocabulary questions right.

  That's stupid, there weren't even any fucking spatial logic puzzles in there.

>> [_] Reiiama Kotsu, Adeptus Administratum 09/22/10(Wed)04:04 No.

  139, even though we don't know what this IQ test is supposed to measure. It definitely isn't
  general intelligence.

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)04:05 No.

  >>1379094
  Internet gullibility is my guess.

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)04:10 No.

  >>1379073
  FROCK YEAR I AM TEH SMERTEST
  >>1379073
  >>1379073

>> [_] Tofu !!Tofu 09/22/10(Wed)04:19 No.

  140 I R GENUS.

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)04:25 No.

  Got seven questions in, got bored, started guessing. 110.

  'Sup.

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)04:26 No.

  151, mathematical learner. But I'm terrible at math, what a bunch of crap.

>> [_] 149 Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)04:31 No.

  >>1379118
  fuck now i have to suck your dick :O

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)04:36 No.

  Durp I dun know english

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)04:46 No.

  Answered everything wrong on purpose
  IQ = 107, above average
  SOUNDS LEGIT

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)04:46 No.

  I've taken a number of IQ tests in the past, and most of them placed me at 129... this test
  places me at 137. Initially happy, I'm kind of skeptical; although it is possible for
  intelligence to increase over time. But here I am, still on 4chan after 4 years... I highly doubt
  my intelligence has sky-rocketed as such.

  I call bullshit

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)04:48 No.

  >>1379132
  But HOW wrong did you answer them? The multiple choice questions give you more points for being
  closer to right.

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)04:53 No.

  >>1379136
  Took obviously wrong alternatives. Plus answering everything wrong on retarded questions like
  these != above average.

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)04:54 No.

  wtf 140? literacy-style learner? wtf is this shit.
  i think the questions were crap and flawed.

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)04:55 No.

  141

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)04:55 No.

  140, and it says I'm a mathematical learner.

  I took an IQ test several years ago and it said I was 116. Either I'm getting smarter, or one of
  them is wrong.

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)05:02 No.

  >>1379148
  When it comes to IQ tests all of them but the one that gave you your highest score are wrong.

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)05:04 No.

  When the Megaman song started to play, I was ure it was a Cory in the House roll. I was
  disappointed.

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)05:04 No.

  >>1379153
  Actually if you get two consecutive fairly high scores with the second one higher it's called
  personal growth and both can be considered to be right.

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)05:11 No.

  144, literacy style

  some questions were retarded, and some just seemed like math or vocabulary questions

  iq is bunk anyway. the best analogy i can think of is having a large barrel... but that doesn't
  mean it's going to be filled with something.

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)05:32 No.

  141 and literacy style learner. I guess that's average or something..

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)05:42 No.

  141 Literary.

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)05:46 No.

  140 wow i must be a millionaire

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)05:48 No.

  Although its methods were wrong, it was spot on. I do have an IQ of 135...

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)06:02 No.

  147, literary

  I do a lot of IQ tests, though, and after a while the questions are all the same.

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)06:03 No.

  128

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)06:03 No.

  I got 132, which IS what I got on my mensa test a few years ago, but I don't trust this thing to
  be correct at all.

>> [_] G. D. !!k1u7swmD0lH 09/22/10(Wed)06:16 No.

  >>1379118
  I just got the same ranking... 151 - Mathematical.
  Now if this test's results were genuine, I could have something to brag about.

  Ah, screw it - let's brag about it anyways.

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)06:16 No.

  149 mathematical learner. Ultimately wash since some shmuck on Newgrounds I'd hardly trust to
  construct a fair metric of intelligence. Flash served its purpose as an entertaining distraction
  however.

>> [_] Rageman 09/22/10(Wed)06:22 No.

  136 haha er no (can i get bonus points english is my 3rd language ?)

>> [_] Anonimous 09/22/10(Wed)06:27 No.

  i wonder when a troll will come and say "i'm a 200 genius è_é"

>> [_] G. D. !!k1u7swmD0lH 09/22/10(Wed)06:28 No.

  >>1379186
  Technically, you just did...

  ...you goddamn troll.

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)06:32 No.

  139

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)06:38 No.

  103 =/

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)06:43 No.

  144. even though true iq cannot be measured this way...

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)06:45 No.

  i got an iq of 148 and i only had to google half of the questions!

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)06:47 No.

  Just for kicks, I spammed the "Skip" button. IQ of 60, and a "mathematical learner".

  ...yyyeaah.

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)06:51 No.

  135... I admit I was a bit shocked.

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)07:03 No.

  .. accidentally said France was a city and got 136 math style learner, went back and said it was
  a country and got 142 and literacy style learner... /me is confused.

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)07:05 No.

  I don't give a shit about the scores, I was just enjoying the music.

  AND THEN CORY IN THE HOUSE

  I'M KEEPING THIS ON ALL DAY

  FUCK YEAH

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)07:14 No.

  149. This test is bull shit, I'm not nearly that smart. Cory in the unce unce unce

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)07:31 No.

  141

  The test was WAY too easy compared to other IQ tests I've taken in the past.

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)07:44 No.

  143
  According to MENSA my IQ is 153, so it's well within the average deviation for the average IQ
  test (usually around 15). Which says a lot about IQ tests in general considering that this one
  was completely retarded.

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)08:03 No.

  144
  lit

  i can live with this, because it seems like most scored lower than i did

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)08:07 No.

  135 lit
  its ok

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)08:15 No.

  >>1379272
  retake test
  135 math
  is there a difference between math and lit?

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)08:26 No.

  133, mathemartical learner.
  Just as predicted

>> [_] 166 Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)08:31 No.

  That was the simplest, most generic IQ test I've ever taken. I hope no one here took this to be
  an accurate measurement of intelligence. At best, it's just pattern recognition and basic problem
  solving. On top of that, multiple choice... give me a break. Anyone out of middle school can pass
  this with flying colors. Real intelligence goes beyond simple processes and choose-the-right-answ
  er questions.
  That said, my IQ is more likely around 130, and sort of an Aspie -- not good at much else besides
  patterns and maths.

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)08:35 No.

  146 T_T

  The test I took 10 years ago was 176.

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)08:36 No.

  this shit is so whack
  halfway through, i thought i was the subject of a turing test

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)08:48 No.

  148, mathematical learner.

  Do I get extra literacy points for knowing how many grammatical and spelling errors there were in
  that piece of shit?

>> [_] anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)08:49 No.

  there any harder tests i can take? http://img196.imageshack.us/img196/4145/30865200.jpg

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)09:03 No.

  I started losing interest and I starting picking answers randomly. My final score is 105. =P

>> [_] Better test Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)09:47 No.

  http://www.puzz.com/lathink.html

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)09:49 No.

  time to get black on track

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)10:00 No.

  OHHH YEAH 96!

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)10:24 No.

  what is the song that plays during the test?

>> [_] Cain !!GBvgNM4tK9g 09/22/10(Wed)10:58 No.

  q5 misspells definitely, sorry, but we're done here

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)11:00 No.

  Lulz, Initial score of 155.

  Retook it, did the same exact answers and scored 154.

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)11:04 No.

  This is bullshit. 141? That's impossible.

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)11:08 No.

  Whoo! 134! I feel smart now. :D

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)11:18 No.

  141 literacy

  I usually do really bad with literacy only.

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)11:24 No.

  121

>> [_] Â 09/22/10(Wed)11:31 No.

  152, mathematical

  I'm surprised there aren't higher scores.
  No, wait, e-penis!

  >mfw I have one of the highest scores without a retake

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)11:43 No.

  139

  Hurray! Now I shall leave this thread for no raisin.

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)11:43 No.

  134, and english isn't even my native language. And I only got 125 at another test. Also I'm
  terrible at math and it says I'm good at them.

  Either it's a waste of time or I got a huge increase in IQ in a matter of months.

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)11:44 No.

  THE SONG IS MEGA MAN FROM MM1

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)11:56 No.

  136 mathmatical

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)12:10 No.

  If you want the music from the end/info page, go here.

  http://www.newgrounds.com/audio/listen/352951

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)12:11 No.

  Bad at english and score 143. pretty unaccurate test

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)12:16 No.

  >IQ = 80
  >Unintelligent
  Ok.

  >IQ = 90
  >Average
  Wait, what?

  >IQ = 100
  >Above average
  That's wrong. The median is set to 100, so 100 is average. Also, when a test doesn't even mention
  standard deviation you can assume it's crap.

  >IQ Testing Questions
  >Tickle.com
  What?
  >Mensa
  Alright, reputable source is decent.
  >IQTest(various)
  Riiiight... translation is "we downloaded a few tests from the internet, everyone knows how
  reliable they are".

  This test is inacurate to say the least, I KNOW my IQ and this test got me a score that's 15
  points higher.

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)12:18 No.

  148 and got maths, MOST LEGIT TEST EVER

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)12:19 No.

  20 out of 20 on the first try. It gave me 147

>> [_] Mr. Fedora 09/22/10(Wed)12:32 No.

  >>135

  Funny, the IQ test I took in high school gave me the same number.

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)12:39 No.

  118 I think it is quite well for one that doesnt know any of your american sayings and used
  assumptions in questions that he didnt knew an naswer

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)12:45 No.

  140 up in this bitch

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)13:08 No.

  137 with reading

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)13:28 No.

  137 with literacy

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)13:33 No.

  Answered every question incorrectly and still got a 97.

  "Social-Type Learner"

  The implication is that society at large are morons. But that's ok. You're completely average
  when it comes to them.

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)13:37 No.

  139 Literacy

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)13:46 No.

  144, literary. Okay then.

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)13:55 No.

  144... why am I feeling so stupid anyway?

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)13:57 No.

  >Bases IQ on knowledge of English
  That surely won't skew the results for non-native English speakers.

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)14:01 No.

  This was like a collection of rejected puzzles from those professor Layton games...

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)14:01 No.

  >35

  what the fuck.

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)14:02 No.

  >>1379449
  I still scored in the genius range. That must mean I'm some sort of as yet undiscovered hyper
  genius.

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)14:04 No.

  >>1379454
  Congratulations, that's moderate to severe mental retardation.

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)14:13 No.

  According to this, 129 & Literacy Style.

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)14:21 No.

  >my face when average of those who posted in this thread is ~132

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)14:28 No.

  141, this test is so... BELIEVABLE

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)14:29 No.

  126. hahaha no stoopids here

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)14:35 No.

  Am I the only one who took this just for the Cory in the House at the end?

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)14:36 No.

  >>1379481
  >Cory in the House

  if you're serious, please subtract 100 points from your final score

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)14:40 No.

  Got 142.

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)14:55 No.

  142. I'm a rare mathematical learner. Cool.

  But then I really doubt you can place much stock in this test.

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)14:55 No.

  I tried to get a low score, but I only managed a 96. Test sucks.

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)15:01 No.

  140 literary :D

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)15:12 No.

  142. Literary.

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)15:14 No.

  I knew you stupid faggots were all secretly geniuses. High five /f/.

>> [_] Captain Flaccid lol, I have !The.Gay2w6 09/22/10(Wed)15:26 No.

  I got 20/20 answers right. This was easy shit.

>> [_] GIANT FUCKING DICKS !!o4L+4SnOeQi 09/22/10(Wed)15:29 No.

  >131
  I'm ok with this.

>> [_] analcunt 09/22/10(Wed)15:30 No.

  138 I rite feel like a dumb shit among all those 140+ fucktards.

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)15:30 No.

  Yeah motherfuckers, 89. I'm a socialist learner too.

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)15:32 No.

  147
  I somewhat doubt the accuracy of this flash though, surprisingly.

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)15:33 No.

  144
  Hell yes crashman music.

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)15:35 No.

  I got 134, but it should be noted that this test is a bit too easy and doesn't have any questions
  regarding shapes, patterns, and general spatial skills.

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)15:36 No.

  141...but call me crazy, I get the feeling this thing MIGHT not be accurate.

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)15:37 No.

  143
  I've never take a iq test before because I'm afraid of being a total dumbass.

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)15:38 No.

  140. I wonder what I'd be on an actual IQ Test.

  Also IQ is a fucking dinosaur and stopped being relevant decades ago. Shit was created in 1912.
  But whatev.

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)15:39 No.

  I got 125 and thats my real IQ as well lol

  (That shit that you do online as a scam isnt real, you gotta go to a doctor to get one. But mine
  matched with my real one!!)

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)15:40 No.

  129 c:
  Also lol@corey in the house playing at the end

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)15:45 No.

  143 and I honestly can't think of anyone who can score lower than this.

  but then again I have self esteem issues

>> [_] BOOYAH!! Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)15:47 No.

  OVER 9000 BITCHES!!

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)15:52 No.

  147 is high?
  Literacy style learner... so I'm good at understanding words? I didn't know...

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)15:55 No.

  /r/ing ultimate muscle roller legend in celebration of my 135 IQ

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)15:56 No.

  139 literary

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)16:01 No.

  Shit IQ test is Shit?
  126, Literacy.
  I call Fucking Bullshit assholes.

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)16:04 No.

  >>1379550
  looks like someone is mad because he didn't score 140+

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)16:05 No.

  141 woot, too bad IQ tests rarely mean anything about a person capabilities. : /

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)16:11 No.

  143

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)16:31 No.

  >>1379065
  moust inacurate test EVER
  i get 149
  idk if its the retarded American IQ measure system
  if it is then im wrong about how bad was this test
  (making this the second worst test that iveen seen)

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)16:40 No.

  >>1379565
  Im a black person and get below 80 your argument is invalid

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)16:59 No.

  142, literacy style learner. Woot. I'm a genius.

>> [_] naksiloth !6xqjXqgnW. 09/22/10(Wed)17:07 No.

  140.
  everything went better than expected.

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)17:25 No.

  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LdzjVnH9YoY

  Because I fucking can.

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)17:29 No.

  the average IQ is around 95~105, and most of you are getting anywhere from 125~140.

  So either 4chan produces a breed of pure intellectual geniuses or this test is fucking RETARDED.

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)17:36 No.

  >>1379595
  EVIL GENIUSESSS FUCK YEEEEAAAAAH
  im going for pudding, i will check the advance of this later

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)17:48 No.

  132

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)17:49 No.

  150... Mathematical learner.. I call Shenanigans.

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)17:55 No.

  142

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)18:06 No.

  140

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)18:16 No.

  i got 98.

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)18:26 No.

  >>1379595
  This.

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)18:26 No.

  150 literacy-learner

  Cory in the house

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)18:29 No.

  >iq-tester
  >newgrounds
  no.jpg

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)18:31 No.

  Internet IQ tests are stupid but the crashman remix payoff at the end was worth it!

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)18:36 No.

  121, good enough for me...

>> [_] Anonymous 09/22/10(Wed)18:38 No.

  137. retook and got 133 :(

>> [_] Ironmind !iUZ4YQ8oZ. 09/22/10(Wed)18:41 No.

  142 Literacy

  I doubt I'm that smart by IQ standards.