File[Tonedeaf Test.swf] - (32 KB)
[_] [G] Are you tonedeaf? Anonymous 06/14/11(Tue)01:19 No.1523767
Post results.
Marked for deletion (old).
>> [_] Anonymous 06/14/11(Tue)01:29 No.1523774
77.7% Normal as hell
>> [_] Anonymous 06/14/11(Tue)02:04 No.1523787
58.3% Yeah, that seems about right...
>> [_] Anonymous 06/14/11(Tue)02:08 No.1523790
75.0% correct normal performance
>> [_] Anonymous 06/14/11(Tue)02:13 No.1523793
Did it twice and got 83.3% both times. Thanks for posting!
>> [_] Anonymous 06/14/11(Tue)02:21 No.1523804
80.6%
Of the 61,036 scores recorded, you scored in the 69th percentile. The percentile is the
percentage of subjects who scored less than you.
>> [_] Anonymous 06/14/11(Tue)02:34 No.1523808
83.3%
much lower than I expected...
>> [_] Anonymous 06/14/11(Tue)02:35 No.1523809
88.9%
This was really cool.
>> [_] Anonymous 06/14/11(Tue)02:42 No.1523810
It would be interesting to have a graph of Tone-Deafness in relation to favourite music genres.
>> [_] Anonymous 06/14/11(Tue)02:45 No.1523814
was expecting screamer, pleasantly surprised when there was none
97.2% (on second try)
was around 77.8% on first try
>> [_] Anonymous 06/14/11(Tue)02:49 No.1523816
There's far too many variables keeping this from being a decent scientific experiment. Just a
novelty really.
>> [_] Anonymous 06/14/11(Tue)02:49 No.1523817
86.1% Correct feels good man
>> [_] Anonymous 06/14/11(Tue)02:53 No.1523820
trial 27 sounds familar, the first set of sounds, not the 2nd.
>> [_] Anonymous 06/14/11(Tue)03:02 No.1523824
Some of the sounds reminded me alot of LoZ.
72.3% btw
>> [_] Anonymous 06/14/11(Tue)03:41 No.1523843
91.7%, first try.
Some of those were pretty evenly matched, made me consider for a few seconds.
>> [_] Anonymous 06/14/11(Tue)03:55 No.1523846
77.8%
>> [_] Anonymous 06/14/11(Tue)04:43 No.1523855
80.6%, niggers
>> [_] Anonymous 06/14/11(Tue)05:03 No.1523858
33 is def fucking different, wtf! how is that the same?
>> [_] Anonymous 06/14/11(Tue)05:07 No.1523859
94.4 percent, 98.6th percentile.
No surprises.
>>1523858
You just are not used to the scale they're using.
>> [_] Anonymous 06/14/11(Tue)05:17 No.1523861
86,1... Pretty well, I guess.
>> [_] Anonymous 06/14/11(Tue)05:22 No.1523862
100%, glad by degree isn't a total waste
>> [_] Anonymous 06/14/11(Tue)05:26 No.1523863
80.6% Correct
Not bad
>> [_] Anonymous 06/14/11(Tue)05:29 No.1523864
83.3% with an ear infection at 3 in the morn. I bet I'll score better rested and healthy.
>> [_] Anonymous 06/14/11(Tue)05:33 No.1523865
63.9% Correct
no music training not too bad?
>> [_] Anonymous 06/14/11(Tue)05:36 No.1523866
I'm assuming most people take this more than once and fuck the results
>> [_] Anonymous 06/14/11(Tue)05:48 No.1523868
94%
Being OCD helps
>> [_] Anonymous 06/14/11(Tue)05:52 No.1523869
>>1523817
high five! me too
>> [_] Anonymous 06/14/11(Tue)05:58 No.1523870
17 is my favorite
24 too
and 27
31 = epic
34 is funny
91.7%..... better then expected
>> [_] Anonymous 06/14/11(Tue)06:49 No.1523875
86.5%
>> [_] Anonymous 06/14/11(Tue)06:58 No.1523882
72.2%
Wow. I have poor hearing based on the results of everyone else in this thread.
I got trials 4, 5, 8, 18, 23, 26, 28, 30, 33, & 35 wrong.
Alot of the music sounds like it could've come from/could've been in a video game. I would've
liked alot of those trials made into full songs.
Seriously, why can't more music be that good?
>> [_] Anonymous 06/14/11(Tue)07:02 No.1523883
This is really more a test of your auditory short-term memory than of your hearing itself.
>> [_] Anonymous 06/14/11(Tue)07:04 No.1523884
75% Normal - Better than I thought I'd do.
Alot of these were catchy but if you answer that you're female, they ask you about your period...
fun stuff...
>> [_] Anonymous 06/14/11(Tue)07:09 No.1523885
77.8%.
Oh well.
>> [_] Anonymous 06/14/11(Tue)08:20 No.1523901
47.2%
Fuck yeah.
>> [_] Anonymous 06/14/11(Tue)09:48 No.1523910
SCREAMER !
SCREAMER !
SCREAMER !
SCREAMER !
SCREAMER !
SCREAMER !
SCREAMER !
SCREAMER !
SCREAMER !
SCREAMER !
SCREAMER !
SCREAMER !
SCREAMER !
SCREAMER !
>> [_] Number Cruncher 06/14/11(Tue)09:55 No.1523914
94.4% a lot of these are more memory and attention to detail than tone-deafness. This is probably
a "blind study" for one of those other factors, disguised as a tone-deaf test to get a baseline
reading without the testee being conscious of their mental behavior. Eg: if I know its a memory
test, Im going to concentrate harder, perhaps use memory techniques that otherwise I wouldn't
use, like a mnemonic, memory mansion, or whistling the tone repeatedly until I have motor-muscle
memory of the movement required to repeat it.
Notice how there is no replay button for each tone set. this would be helpful for a tone deafness
test, but would inhibit a test of memory or attentiveness.
>> [_] Anonymous 06/14/11(Tue)09:59 No.1523916
80.6%
>> [_] Anonymous 06/14/11(Tue)10:06 No.1523919
that's a working memory test not a fucking tone test
>> [_] Anonymous 06/14/11(Tue)10:23 No.1523923
88.8%
All four of the ones I got wrong were the Same when I chose Different.
I wish it would play the two pieces more than once.
>> [_] Anonymous 06/14/11(Tue)10:33 No.1523926
88.9% better than I thought I had done.
>> [_] Anonymous 06/14/11(Tue)11:15 No.1523931
first try 90%
>> [_] Anonymous 06/14/11(Tue)11:27 No.1523932
86.1%
Bitches
>> [_] Anonymous 06/14/11(Tue)11:42 No.1523935
86.1%
No musical training
Feels good, man
>> [_] Anonymous 06/14/11(Tue)13:03 No.1523959
50% and in the 1st percentile. I never knew it was so bad.
>> [_] Anonymous 06/14/11(Tue)13:06 No.1523960
90.4%
I can play the trumpet, that's about it.
I did used to play the violin, but I have forgotten long ago.
>> [_] Anonymous 06/14/11(Tue)13:31 No.1523964
94.4%
>> [_] Anonymous 06/14/11(Tue)13:48 No.1523969
100%
was interesting, but they could have made them longer to actually get something out of people.
>> [_] Anonymous 06/14/11(Tue)13:52 No.1523970
55.6% Correct
FML
>> [_] Anonymous 06/14/11(Tue)13:53 No.1523972
91.7% first try. AIM popped up in the middle of it and started throwing me off I think.
>> [_] Anonymous 06/14/11(Tue)13:59 No.1523975
This is stupid. I was concentrating on overall tone, not on 1 note differences. I didn't try
memorizing the tunes at all. I hope they enjoy getting false data.
>> [_] Anonymous 06/14/11(Tue)14:27 No.1523988
70%
>> [_] Anonymous 06/14/11(Tue)14:27 No.1523989
75.0% despite musical training
>> [_] Anonymous 06/14/11(Tue)14:28 No.1523990
75% :D
>> [_] Anonymous 06/14/11(Tue)14:31 No.1523991
67.8%
Oh no, my life is ruined
>> [_] Anonymous 06/14/11(Tue)14:41 No.1523992
>>1523910
>> [_] tone deaf? Anonymous 06/14/11(Tue)15:00 No.1523993
yeah pretty much >.<
52.8% isn't metal a good stimulant for ears?
>> [_] Anonymous 06/14/11(Tue)16:06 No.1524006
52.8% Correct
I seem to have some kind of memory deficit.
>> [_] Anonymous 06/14/11(Tue)16:50 No.1524018
From what I can see, I was the best one here. 97.2 on first try. No music training.
>> [_] Anonymous 06/14/11(Tue)17:08 No.1524023
This can have a lot to do with the quality of your speakers, so don't get too worried if you get
a low score :P
>> [_] Anonymous 06/14/11(Tue)17:10 No.1524024
66.7
>>1523923
This (more of a memory test. No replay wth).
>> [_] Anonymous 06/14/11(Tue)17:24 No.1524030
As it's been stated, this is most likely a memory test and not a test for tone-deafness. I have
pretty good relative pitch, but only scored in the 80's for this because some of the things in
here are long enough that it's hard to tell minor differences apart without the ability to
re-listen or anything.
