File :[lhc_atlas.swf] - (113 KB)
[_] [?] ROW ROW FIGHT THE POWAH Anonymous 02/26/09(Thu)01:29 No.907287
Marked for deletion (old).
>> [_] Anonymous 02/26/09(Thu)01:32 No.907293
You forgot the black hole.
>> [_] Anonymous 02/26/09(Thu)01:33 No.907294
>>907293
You had to noko? Because finding this thread among the 20 threads on /f/ is that hard?
>> [_] Anonymous 02/26/09(Thu)01:36 No.907297
>>907294
Noko doesn't even work in /f/. It just stick in the e-mail field, and I frankly can't be arsed to
remove it unless I'm saging.
>> [_] Anonymous 02/26/09(Thu)02:16 No.907326
goddamn it i still keep typing "hardon" everytime i try to write anything about the large hardon
collider
>> [_] Anonymous 02/26/09(Thu)04:11 No.907391
I'd collide my large hardon with her black hole if you know what I mean.
>> [_] Anonymous 02/26/09(Thu)04:32 No.907401
Balls are touching, cosmically.
>> [_] JustABox 02/26/09(Thu)05:18 No.907421
All that trouble just to divide by zero?
>> [_] Anonymous 02/26/09(Thu)05:47 No.907441
>>907421
If this is the only way to properly divide by zero, THEN IT IS ACCEPTABLE!
>> [_] Anonymous 02/26/09(Thu)09:09 No.907541
Doomsday device in action.
>> [_] Anonymous 02/26/09(Thu)09:14 No.907543
with this device dividing by zero is so easy, a caveman could do it
>> [_] GEICO CAVEMAN 02/26/09(Thu)09:32 No.907548
>>907543
I am offended... you sir are a prick
>> [_] Anonymous 02/26/09(Thu)09:49 No.907550
It's funny that nobody seems more worried by the still-unlikely but at least equally plausible
runaway strangelet scenario.
>> [_] Anonymous 02/26/09(Thu)10:16 No.907563
>>907543
Caveman could do it even without it! But he's too kind do this.
>> [_] Anonymous 02/26/09(Thu)11:28 No.907588
... 2 Protons can't make a huge black hole. End of Story.
>> [_] Anonymous 02/26/09(Thu)11:35 No.907592
i wonder how they guarantee the particles collide in the detector and not elsewhere?
>> [_] Anonymous 02/26/09(Thu)11:43 No.907595
>>907588
Protip: Black holes are always incredibly small.
>> [_] Anonymous 02/26/09(Thu)12:02 No.907612
>>907595
Protip: he wasn't talking about the size of the impossible black hole.
>> [_] Anonymous 02/26/09(Thu)12:06 No.907615
>>907612
Protip: It is not impossible for a black hole to form under these circumstances - it is just very
unlikely that it will survive for long enough to cause damage.
>> [_] Anonymous 02/26/09(Thu)12:10 No.907619
Protip: I caused damage to your mom's small black hole.
>> [_] Anonymous 02/26/09(Thu)12:17 No.907622
>>907612
Protip: "Huge" is a measure of size, meaning something big.
>> [_] Anonymous 02/26/09(Thu)12:36 No.907633
Black holes doesn't work like a fucking vaccum cleaner morons. A 'small' black hole wouldn't
absorb ' al ittle' and then die. You're all fucking retarded.
>> [_] Anonymous 02/26/09(Thu)12:45 No.907635
also there is nothing anywhere that show that this has any chance to create a black hole. This
isn't anywhere close to how black holes are created in the universe. It's still concidered
'possible' since we don't know exactly what will happend. It's possible in the same way that it's
possible that a big pink rabbit will jump out and throw chocolate at us.
>> [_] Anonymous 02/26/09(Thu)12:49 No.907639
>>907633
Hawking radiation fool.
>> [_] Anonymous 02/26/09(Thu)12:53 No.907644
>>907639
Only relevant in vaccum. Nice try though.
>> [_] Anonymous 02/26/09(Thu)13:00 No.907647
>>907644
I was under the impression there was a vacuum inside to begin with. Science can do that these
days, you know.
