File[H2O_Car_-_Water_Powered_Car.swf] - (2.63 MB)
[_] [L] Anonymous 10/18/11(Tue)18:35 No.1570838
>> [_] Anonymous 10/18/11(Tue)19:46 No.1570851
But doesn't the process of breaking hydrogen and oxygen by itself require energy?
>> [_] Anonymous 10/18/11(Tue)19:51 No.1570853
>>1570851
Yeah, the company in this video already shut down citing costs. Either way, it's pretty much a
guaranteed hoax
>> [_] Anonymous 10/18/11(Tue)22:13 No.1570885
This technology has been around for a while. But it isn't efficient enough to really be useful.
Besides, wouldn't that release a lot of oxygen or hydrogen into the atmosphere if everybody used
it?
>> [_] Anonymous 10/18/11(Tue)22:36 No.1570893
Step 1: Split water+energy into hydrogen+oxygen.
Step 2: Combine hydrogen+oxygen into water+energy.
Conservation of energy dictates that it takes as much energy to split water into hydrogen+oxygen
as you get out from combining hydrogen+oxygen into water. There's no net energy output to power
the car!
>> [_] Anonymous 10/18/11(Tue)23:33 No.1570904
burn the hydrogen and oxygen noobs
>> [_] Anonymous 10/19/11(Wed)00:19 No.1570909
piss...all im saying
>> [_] Anonymous 10/19/11(Wed)01:24 No.1570928
>>1570904
that's the same thing as combining them. try taking freshman chemistry again.
>> [_] Anonymous 10/19/11(Wed)02:01 No.1570944
I believe Stan Meyer was first
>> [_] Anonymous 10/19/11(Wed)04:40 No.1570971
Wasn't there a bike that could run on air?
>> [_] 10/19/11(Wed)06:45 No.1570978
this is the gayest shit
>> [_] Anonymous 10/19/11(Wed)07:17 No.1570986
Maybe it runs on gullibility?
>> [_] Anonymous 10/19/11(Wed)07:44 No.1570993
Well this is massively inefficient. No wonder they shut down...
