STORY LOOP FURRY PORN GAMES C SERVICES [?] [R] RND POPULAR | Archived flashes: 229672 |
/disc/ · /res/ — /show/ · /fap/ · /gg/ · /swf/ | P0001 · P2596 · P5191 |
This is resource GDBPAV0, a Archived Thread.
Original location: http://boards.4chan.org/f/res/1573209 Recognized format: Yes, thread post count is 10. Discovered flash files: 1 File[fucktheblondie(fixed).swf] - (170 KB) [_] [H] Removed "Click for something special" Anonymous 10/28/11(Fri)06:25 No.1573209 Watermark in the top left instead now, oh well. >> [_] Anonymous 10/28/11(Fri)09:13 No.1573219 No you didn't, you just renamed the original flash which didn't have that watermark in the first place. =/ >> [_] Anonymous 10/28/11(Fri)09:25 No.1573221 >>1573219 My bad then. The only version I ever found was the one that had "click for something special" on it, never knew there was one without it. I figured a watermark in the top left hand corner was less annoying than the huge green text in the top center. >> [_] Anonymous 10/28/11(Fri)19:27 No.1573305 so you pretend you made changes to a flash that you never made any changes to? or was that your bad too? >> [_] Anonymous 10/28/11(Fri)19:48 No.1573313 >>1573305 dude calm the fuck down, who cares what he did or didn't, shits hot >> [_] Anonymous 10/28/11(Fri)21:20 No.1573331 Oh look, that horribly edited stolen flash again. And here I hoped you gave up on posting shit like that. >> [_] Anonymous 10/28/11(Fri)22:14 No.1573339 >>1573331 Actually it's a fix of a flash that was edited by a site owner who horribly edited a flash by adding a watermark and breaking a few sprites of a flash which was a face hack job of another flash. >> [_] Anonymous 10/28/11(Fri)22:20 No.1573341 Original Flash is way better! That Hair looks just awful! Looks like it has been edited by a 15 year old emo-faggot!! Oh, and by the way: DON'T FAP TO THIS!!! >> [_] Anonymous 10/29/11(Sat)05:48 No.1573392 >>1573305 So I decompile a perfectly fine flash then export it with a different name just to add a watermark for some terrible program? I don't see where you are going with this. I doubt you do either though. >> [_] Anonymous 10/29/11(Sat)08:34 No.1573405 Can anyone tell what is the original and who made it? |
|