File[PEPPERSPRAY.swf] - (1.07 MB)
[_] [L] UC Davis police officers used pepper spray DOX DOX DOX DOX DOX'ed 11/20/11(Sun)21:10
No.

Marked for deletion (old).

>> [_] Anonymous 11/20/11(Sun)21:19 No.

  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4RdtX9fwTOk#t=3m44s
  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4RdtX9fwTOk#t=3m44s

>> [_] Anonymous 11/20/11(Sun)22:03 No.

  HOLY FUCKING SHIT, NOBODY CARES

  It's just faggy libtards/hipsters getting what they deserve.

>> [_] Anonymous 11/20/11(Sun)22:04 No.

  Good. I wish he would do it some more.

  Those faggots deserve it.

>> [_] Anonymous 11/20/11(Sun)22:04 No.

  >>1578742
  Yes, those evil hippie scum, just sitting there curled up into little balls and being all
  peaceful and quiet.

  You just can't let shit like that go unpunished.

>> [_] Anonymous 11/20/11(Sun)22:06 No.

  >>1578744
  Well said.

>> [_] Anonymous 11/20/11(Sun)22:06 No.

  Oh my god, did you see how pointy the hood on that dude's striped hoodie is? That's a fucking
  deadly weapon right there, and he was pointing it RIGHT AT THE COPS!

  THEY'RE LUCKY IT WAS ONLY PEPPER SPRAY!

>> [_] Anonymous 11/20/11(Sun)22:15 No.

  You all on the wrong side of the lulz spectrum
  You should want to see everyone get fucked over

  it would have been more epic had the police used beanbag guns / or other fun toys to attack the
  students, maybe killed one

  Its also going to be funny as that police is going to be harassed to hell and lose his job.
  i'm hoping some one finds his wife / kids or relatives Christmas shopping and sprays the fuck out
  of them.

>> [_] Anonymous 11/20/11(Sun)23:00 No.

  >>1578744
  Faggots sit on the ground. Are asked to move several times while they obstruct the pathway. They
  get maced for not complying with the request to move.

  I don't see why you guys are so butthurt about this.

>> [_] Anonymous 11/20/11(Sun)23:07 No.

  >>1578748
  his wife and kids didn't pepper spray those useless tools.

>> [_] Anonymous 11/20/11(Sun)23:08 No.

  >>1578761
  http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/11/19/uc-davis-police-pepper-spray-students_n_110
  2728.html?ref=mo
  stpopular
  >[California prison] regulations prohibit the use of pepper spray on inmates in all circumstances
  other than the immediate threat of violence. If a prisoner is seated, by definition the use of
  pepper spray is prohibited. Any prison guard who used pepper spray on a seated prisoner would
  face immediate disciplinary review for the use of excessive force. Even in the case of a prison
  riot in which inmates use extreme violence, once a prisoner sits down he or she is not considered
  to be an imminent threat. And if prison guards go into a situation where the use of pepper spray
  is considered likely, they are required to have medical personnel nearby to treat the victims of
  the chemical agent.

  So college kids sitting on a sidewalk have less rights than convicted felons, in your fucked up
  brain?

>> [_] Anonymous 11/20/11(Sun)23:19 No.

  are these the kids protesting massive tuitition hikes?

>> [_] Anonymous 11/20/11(Sun)23:19 No.

  >>1578764
  You're making a direct quote of a statuette from a law in California. Which is bar none the
  biggest left wing nut house in the country.

  Example: Arcadia -
  Peacocks have the right of way to cross any street, including driveways.

  Seriously. Go into a dick hurricane with your mouth open and fucking die.

>> [_] Anonymous 11/20/11(Sun)23:19 No.

  Gtfo out of /f/ and go back to /b/ where you think people care.
  Unlike the rest of 4chan no one gives a shit about this, go be white knights who want to force
  their views of "wrong doings" somewhere else faggot.

>> [_] Anonymous 11/20/11(Sun)23:19 No.

  I'm glad those kids got sprayed
  Everything is awesome right now and all theses protests are just trying to rock the boat.
  They are protesting just to be protesting, they have no cause.

>> [_] Anonymous 11/20/11(Sun)23:21 No.

  >>1578770
  Yes, with increasing unemployment and hiking prices due to inflation, everything is JUST FUCKING
  DANDY!!!

>> [_] Anonymous 11/20/11(Sun)23:22 No.

  ITT: er'rbody mad

>> [_] Anonymous 11/20/11(Sun)23:22 No.

  >>1578768
  >You're making a direct quote of a statuette from a law in California.

  Ummm, hell-fucking-o?
  >UC Davis
  >C
  >California

  >Peacocks have the right of way to cross any street, including driveways.
  Yes, that's so much more crazy than passing a draconian immigration law that completely destroys
  your state's economy like Georgia.

>> [_] Anonymous 11/20/11(Sun)23:25 No.

  ITT: leftards gettin' mad.

>> [_] Anonymous 11/20/11(Sun)23:26 No.

  >>1578769
  Oh dear, you seem to have forgoten the " 's" on the end of "Want's"

  Also faggots like this thread just side with the cops to go against popular opinion because its
  too mainstream.
  weeaboo scene kids and hipsters.

  Just enjoy the loop of people being pepper sprayed

>> [_] Anonymous 11/20/11(Sun)23:27 No.

  >>1578776
  Name me one reason why we shouldn't be.

>> [_] Anonymous 11/20/11(Sun)23:27 No.

  >>1578777
  >Oh dear, you seem to have forgoten the " 's" on the end of "Want's"

  Actually he didn't. If you're going to be condescending, at least make sure you're right.

  Dumbshit.

>> [_] FELL FOR IT AGAIN Anonymous 11/20/11(Sun)23:28 No.

  >>1578779
  >>1578779
  lol trolled

>> [_] Anonymous 11/20/11(Sun)23:29 No.

  Does anyone know where the music is from?

>> [_] Anonymous 11/20/11(Sun)23:29 No.

  >>1578780
  ok bro

>> [_] Anonymous 11/20/11(Sun)23:30 No.

  >>1578783
  no ones your bro namefag

>> [_] Anonymous 11/20/11(Sun)23:31 No.

  >>1578782
  http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=NO4L-jGsRZk#!

>> [_] Anonymous 11/20/11(Sun)23:32 No.

  >>1578785
  I knew sounded familiar!
  It's from MLP

>> [_] Anonymous 11/20/11(Sun)23:37 No.

  BAAWWWW

>> [_] Anonymous 11/20/11(Sun)23:40 No.

  Hes kinda far away from the people being sprayed

>> [_] Anonymous 11/20/11(Sun)23:40 No.

  >Yes, those evil hippie scum, just sitting there curled up into little balls and being all
  peaceful and quiet.
  That's just it. If you want to fight someone then fight them. If you're going to set there and
  wait for them to shoot you then that's probably what's going to happen.

>> [_] Anonymous 11/20/11(Sun)23:41 No.

  why is this being posted in /f/

  just

  why

>> [_] Anonymous 11/20/11(Sun)23:41 No.

  >>1578789
  He wanted to be sure not to get any on him.

  >>1578790
  >They didn't give the cops a reason to spray them, therefore they deserved to be sprayed.

>> [_] Anonymous 11/20/11(Sun)23:44 No.

  The email address is offline.

>> [_] Anonymous 11/20/11(Sun)23:53 No.

  >>1578789
  He's just doing his job... he doesn't want to really hurt them. He is just misting the whole
  group in an attempt to make them move. If he wanted to really get them he would have squatted
  down and really laid into their faces instead of misting their hoodies.

  Protests don't do shit and I'm getting tired of all these fucking teens trying to act big until
  the defecation hits the oscillation and they have ti stand up or cry for mercy... in the end they
  always cry foul play no matter what they did.

>> [_] Anonymous 11/20/11(Sun)23:57 No.

  >>1578795
  Right. The Civil Rights protests, the Vietnam protests, the Arab Spring protests... all
  completely pointless and ineffective.

>> [_] Anonymous 11/21/11(Mon)00:02 No.

  Alright, so the email address has three "i"s, not two.
  japikeiii@ucdavis.edu

>> [_] Anonymous 11/21/11(Mon)00:04 No.

  ITT one faggot get's uppity.

>> [_] Anonymous 11/21/11(Mon)00:08 No.

  >>1578799
  That's what the guy who registered the similar "three i's" address just to see all the hate mail
  wants you to think.

>> [_] Anonymous 11/21/11(Mon)00:11 No.

  >>1578797
  Yep you got it... Damn you're good.

>> [_] Anonymous 11/21/11(Mon)00:16 No.

  >>1578774
  Im sorry if a peacock crosses out in front of me while Im driving, Im speeding the hell up and
  hope to god I drag it a little....same goes with Illegals

>> [_] Anonymous 11/21/11(Mon)00:19 No.

  >>1578797
  >>arab spring
  >>protestors

  The guys getting slaughtered in syria or the guys who staged a NATO backed war against their
  government?

>> [_] Anonymous 11/21/11(Mon)00:20 No.

  >>1578808

  LOL SO EDGY

  what a faggot underageb& troll kiddo you are

>> [_] Anonymous 11/21/11(Mon)00:20 No.

  >>1578808

  how2 troll teahadists
  1) post something (anything) contradicting their worldview.
  2) continue to prod them until they openly advocate murder/human rights abuses/terrorism.
  3) now that the teahadist has voluntarily destroyed his own credibility, you have won. you may
  continue to gloat until either he leaves the thread or you get bored

>> [_] Anonymous 11/21/11(Mon)00:21 No.

  I was there, it was fucking HILARIOUS

>> [_] Anonymous 11/21/11(Mon)00:22 No.

  >>1578812
  And what a disgrunted talk-radio grump you are

>> [_] Anonymous 11/21/11(Mon)00:25 No.

  >>1578813
  >2) continue to prod them until they openly advocate ...human rights abuse

  well they were doing that the second they came into the thread and started defending this
  shithead cop

>> [_] Anonymous 11/21/11(Mon)00:31 No.

  I still don't see why you guy's are so butt hurt over this.

>> [_] Anonymous 11/21/11(Mon)00:32 No.

  >>1578819
  Try to master the hidden mysteries of the apostrophe before you attempt to tackle more difficult
  problems such as why people would object to living in an oppressive police state.

>> [_] Anonymous 11/21/11(Mon)00:35 No.

  >>1578820
  youre awfully butt hurt about proper punctuation and speling too.

>> [_] Anonymous 11/21/11(Mon)00:44 No.

  Well fucking deal with it you crybaby.
  Stupid ass liberal

>> [_] Anonymous 11/21/11(Mon)00:46 No.

  >>1578822
  he's not mad, just disappointed

>> [_] Anonymous 11/21/11(Mon)00:51 No.

  >>1578825
  I think taking the time to formulate a response would indicate being upset and a certain amount
  of vested interest as opposed to disappointment. If you really didn't want to validate someones
  statement you would refrain from posting.

  Therefore we conclude that the entirety of this thread is composed of butt hurt and who gives a
  fuck. Seriously, it's the end of the weekend. Try to find something relaxing to do instead of
  having an aneurysm on the internet and flopping your dick all over your keyboard in
  self-righteous indignation.

>> [_] Anonymous 11/21/11(Mon)00:53 No.

  inb4 angry lefta- oh wait.

  lawl.

  Also, I thought 4chan would've lol'd their asses off at this rather than be asspained about it.

>> [_] Anonymous 11/21/11(Mon)00:54 No.

  >>1578828
  >try to convince everyone you aren't even mad by writing two paragraph essay about how much you
  dgaf

>> [_] Anonymous 11/21/11(Mon)00:58 No.

  I think they could have been shotgunned with bean bags. Or hit with a night stick. Using a billy
  club would have been MUCH cheaper than an aerosol powered can of capsicum.

  Maybe we should ask them to do a cost reassessment and just beat them with a club. Think of all
  the tax dollars we would save.

>> [_] Anonymous 11/21/11(Mon)01:00 No.

  Ahh.... Now I get why the liberals are so angry about this.

  It reminds them of themselves being bullied in High School, and they don't like it.

>> [_] Anonymous 11/21/11(Mon)01:01 No.

  >>1578834
  Yes, that surely must be it.

>> [_] Anonymous 11/21/11(Mon)01:08 No.

  >>1578768
  >>1578768

  Hey, I used to live in Arcadia. There weren't that many peacocks anyway. Plus it's not like they
  loitered in front of cars like it's nothing, they always ran the fuck off if a car was coming.

  Really, it's not a big deal and not exactly a stellar example of loony liberal leftism.

>> [_] Anonymous 11/21/11(Mon)01:10 No.

  >>1578836
  Elucidate me.

>> [_] Anonymous 11/21/11(Mon)01:15 No.

  >>1578837

  I already did. I would argue that having peacocks around Arcadia increases property values
  because where else can you find peacocks in the city? Not to mention that Arcadia is a really
  nice suburb. They're not really a nuisance and went you do see them, they're pretty neat.

>> [_] Anonymous 11/21/11(Mon)01:19 No.

  >>1578838
  I was talking more or less what you considered a stellar example of "loony left hand liberalism".
  I thought peacock avoidance and the inability to shoot at any game animal from a moving vehicle
  sans "whale" were two prime examples. But if you have one firsthand I'd love to hear it over this
  cup of coffee I'm sipping on.

>> [_] Anonymous 11/21/11(Mon)01:22 No.

  >>1578839
  Someone who cares about the health and well-being of a creature that isn't himself - let alone
  one that isn't human - isn't very likely to have many examples of "liberalism gone mad" on the
  tip of his tongue...

>> [_] Anonymous 11/21/11(Mon)01:29 No.

  >everyone saying they deserved it for not following lawful orders

  So if a police officer breaks the law, say during a stop or something, and I call them out on it
  and they refuse to comply, is it okay for me to assault the police officer?

>> [_] Anonymous 11/21/11(Mon)01:30 No.

  Your doing it wrong Mr. Pike.
  Next time use Napalm on these losers, and make all those fags die in a fire!

>> [_] Anonymous 11/21/11(Mon)01:30 No.

  >>1578840
  I'm more bi-partisan than anything. I just find that both sides have their extremes. It's funny
  to hear of either.

  Misappropriated spending in the form of a 890k tarmac on an airbase when the company is being
  headed by the senators cousin (Which by the way from all pictures was perfectly fine before). Or
  when zany left hand liberals take policies to protect the vested interests of criminals more than
  citizens.

  Either or, potatoe potato it's all the same to me. And you can't be honest in saying there isn't
  SOME form of legislation from your political party that you think is balls to the wall retarded.

  Tuition hikes and macing aside maybe some of that protesting should go towards rebuilding the
  infrastructure. Having keystones from bridges falling down and killing women in their cars to me
  seems like a pretty damned important investment.

>> [_] Anonymous 11/21/11(Mon)01:31 No.

  >>1578841
  You probably already assaulted him by looking at him funny.

  Enjoy your riot baton up the ass.

>> [_] Anonymous 11/21/11(Mon)01:34 No.

  >>1578840

  Pretty much this. California for the most part is like any other place (outside of CA I've only
  lived in north east Florida). Really not much different in terms of law or the people, even
  culture wise. I've driven through most of the contiguous states and most of them are alike.
  Except for Utah, man that place gave me the willies.

  People don't realize that while the cities tend to be liberal, when you go inland there are very
  staunchly conservative counties, like a slice of the old south in terms of demographics. It's
  just that the cities have the votes.

>> [_] Anonymous 11/21/11(Mon)01:44 No.

  >>1578843

  Honestly, I think you've been reading too much of a partisan blog (drudge report?). As long as
  there are politicians, there will be pork. And both parties are not immune to nepotism, parochial
  porkbarrel. It's not fair to say that pork is endemic to Democrats because it isn't.

  Also I have no clue what you're referring to about criminals in California. Besides, I don't know
  the exact statistics but there are a lot of people locked up for nonviolent drug offenses. Just
  because they receive the label of criminal doesn't mean that we can forget about them. This is
  probably one of the craziest thing California does is lock up so many people for really petty
  drug offenses. It's a waste of money and of human capital.

>> [_] Anonymous 11/21/11(Mon)01:52 No.

  Usually it takes a new Zone flash to get this many posts...

>> [_] Anonymous 11/21/11(Mon)02:07 No.

  >>1578841
  >implying you have any authority over an officer of the "law".

>> [_] Anonymous 11/21/11(Mon)02:15 No.

  >70 replies on /f/
  I must be a newfag.

>> [_] Anonymous 11/21/11(Mon)02:20 No.

  Why isn't this pepper spray shit on /ck/?

>> [_] Anonymous 11/21/11(Mon)02:37 No.

  >>1578856

  yes you do have authority which is to include deadly force if need be over officers of the law.
  good luck trying to prove what he was doing was wrong and required you to defend yourself or
  others by injuring/killing him.

  Cops can go postal, citizens have the right to arrest, and I doubt any of you have read the laws
  and rights of your state in regards to human and citizen rights and police regulations. Both
  citizens and officials have laws to abide by. If you don't like the rules break them. Just know
  you have a price to pay by doing so.

>> [_] Sleepingeasy !!hixPAyXzLya 11/21/11(Mon)02:41 No.

  I was there. Fuck the cops for using overly aggressive actions, and fuck the protesters for being
  dumbfucks that can't follow instructions and don't know what they're actually protesting.

  Can't wait for a brawl to happen.

>> [_] Anonymous 11/21/11(Mon)02:55 No.

  >>1578874

  >typical UCD alum.txt

>> [_] Anonymous 11/21/11(Mon)03:18 No.

  >>1578764
  Disciplinary review does not necessarily mean disciplinary action.

  Say an inmate sits down, but in doing so, obstructs facility programs or potentially compromises
  safety. Force can and will be used, up to and including pepper spray.

  But there will be an investigation, because the guy was sitting down, and spraying a person
  sitting on the ground sounds pretty bad at face value.

  But when the details of the situation become clear, the officer may not be prosecuted. Depends on
  how good the reasoning was. I've sprayed an inmate who managed to send several staff to the
  infirmary/emergency room while in handcuffs. I was put under investigation for spraying an inmate
  who was in handcuffs.

  But as someone has sprayed and been sprayed several times, I consider it much safer than physical
  force. I've seen pulled muscles, broken bones, and worse when trying to use physical force to
  move/restrain someone. Never have that with pepper spray.

>> [_] Anonymous 11/21/11(Mon)03:31 No.

  >>1578797
  >>Right. The Civil Rights protests,

  Didn't actually accomplish anything until the people started rioting.

  >>the Vietnam protests

  Didn't stop the war. It was already unpopular, even without the protesting because casualties
  were rising and the public had a poor understanding of the goals of the conflict. Just like the
  Iraq War wasn't made unpopular because of protesting. It was made unpopular because too many
  people were getting killed for reasons nobody understood.

  >>the Arab Spring protests... all completely pointless and ineffective.

  The successful ones were the ones where the protesters ended up turning violent, or had the
  military on their side, so they had the threat of violence.

  All the others so far been suppressed by force or have petered out.

>> [_] Anonymous 11/21/11(Mon)03:34 No.

  >>1578882
  So your message is that we need to start rioting...

  imokaywiththis.wmv

>> [_] Anonymous 11/21/11(Mon)03:44 No.

  >>1578884

  That, or voting. No, not just for president. Vote in mid-terms, and other, smaller elections.

  Politicians want to keep their jobs. They make choices, not based on what they think people want,
  but what will keep them in office.

  So if you have the power to vote them out of office, you can more strongly influence their
  actions.

  But that's slow and less dramatic/romantic, so it doesn't appeal as much to younger individuals.
  Protests are more in your face, but tend to accomplish less.

  So young people march in the streets, while our future leaders (and policies) are decided by
  older demographics.

>> [_] Anonymous 11/21/11(Mon)03:48 No.

  >>1578888
  Oh please. Voting isn't going to solve a damn thing.

  99% of the country still votes for major party candidates, and anyone with enough money to change
  that fact through elections has no interest in destabilizing things.

>> [_] Anonymous 11/21/11(Mon)03:49 No.

  >>1578888
  >>not based on what they think people want,

  I meant to say, "not so much based on what they think is best."

  Staunchly anti-abortion candidates rarely run on the "I will abolish" abortion platform because
  that doesn't get as many votes. Neither do people who encourage increased taxes want to increase
  taxes *that* much, and never on the majority of Americans (the ones who usually vote).

>> [_] Anonymous 11/21/11(Mon)03:54 No.

  here i was thinking that "its maybe something that removes pepperspray". but i guess its actually
  pepperspray

>> [_] Anonymous 11/21/11(Mon)03:56 No.

  >>1578889

  Wait... wait. Voting doesn't work because most people vote for certain kinds of candidates, thus
  electing them to office?

  Even if it's not the candidates you or I may want, that doesn't mean that voting doesn't work.

>> [_] Anonymous 11/21/11(Mon)04:01 No.

  >>1578894
  They aren't the candidates *they* want, either. They're just too passively ignorant to realize it.

>> [_] Anonymous 11/21/11(Mon)04:20 No.

  >>1578896

  Pretty sure they vote for who they want- or against who they don't want.

>> [_] Anonymous 11/21/11(Mon)04:21 No.

  >>1578792
  lulzy thread and a flash? Seems straightforward enough.

  >>1578828

  Watching the train-wreck is fun though. Kind of sums up the human race, really.

>> [_] Anonymous 11/21/11(Mon)07:30 No.

  >anonymous hijacked by hipster faggots
  nope, I'm out. The internet is no longer an anti-social sub-culture. It's one big fucking
  facebook.

  Fuck Zuckerberg, fuck Moot.

>> [_] Anonymous 11/21/11(Mon)08:32 No.

  >>1578922
  Welcome to 2007, slowpoke.

  All the haters in this thread should really read A Confederancy of Dunces since you're all
  Ignatius wannabes anyway. Maybe it'll give you some perspective.

>> [_] Anonymous 11/21/11(Mon)08:39 No.

  >>1578922
  You're realizing this now?
  Where were you in '06?

>> [_] Anonymous 11/21/11(Mon)09:09 No.

  I think what they're trying to say is, "Voting doesn't put leaders in power who can declare
  themselves above the law and put an end to this voting business before the stupid proles elect a
  Rethuglican. Only violent overthrow of the system can do that, so that's what we're going to do
  OW OW OW OH GOD THE PEPPER SPRAY HURTS HOW COULD SOMETHING LIKE THIS HAPPEN I NEVER SAID VIOLENCE
  SHOULD BE USED AGAINST US"

>> [_] Anonymous 11/21/11(Mon)09:37 No.

  Yeah, whenever basic human rights are being violated, it's somehow always a question of how
  liberal a person is, isn't it? I guess conservatives are more concerned with clean streets than
  police brutality.

>> [_] Anonymous 11/21/11(Mon)09:44 No.

  "People need to question authority!"
  Okay, how about we question YOUR authority.
  "OMG NOT FAIR"

  "People need to be eliminated to protect the environment."
  Okay, how about we start by eliminating YOU?
  "OMG NOT FAIR"

  OWS needs to STFU and GBTW.
  "Okay, how about we STFU and GBTW at shutting YOU down?"
  Pepper spray FTW.
  "OMG NOT FAIR"

>> [_] Anonymous 11/21/11(Mon)10:15 No.

  Lol wow this crappy video I made has 92 responses
  I was half trolling and all of /f shares its political opinion.

>> [_] Anonymous 11/21/11(Mon)10:20 No.

  just givin em a spray down nothing to see here folks

>> [_] Anonymous 11/21/11(Mon)10:31 No.

  Fuck these kids. I'm so sick of hearing about anything related to OWS, this shit needs to end, it
  has accomplished nothing.

>> [_] Anonymous 11/21/11(Mon)10:35 No.

  tl;dr

  What's the 10-second flash loop about? I've been living under a rock.

>> [_] Anonymous 11/21/11(Mon)10:36 No.

  An article appeared in the Washington Post today.

>> [_] Anonymous 11/21/11(Mon)10:37 No.

  >>1578931
  Wow, that was dumb

>> [_] Anonymous 11/21/11(Mon)10:38 No.

  99...

>> [_] Anonymous 11/21/11(Mon)10:39 No.

  100 GET

>> [_] Anonymous 11/21/11(Mon)10:44 No.

  what a lame get
  fucking cancer not doing it right

>> [_] Anonymous 11/21/11(Mon)11:24 No.

  >>1578942

  All gets are cancer. You suck.

>> [_] Anonymous 11/21/11(Mon)11:27 No.

  >>1578948
  what a lame troll
  fucking newfag doing it wrong

>> [_] Anonymous 11/21/11(Mon)11:36 No.

  REALLY?

  103 replies? Seriously?

  The analpain seems to be great here.

>> [_] Anonymous 11/21/11(Mon)11:57 No.

  I lold at this. Your liberal tears are delicious. And theirs would be extra spicy, just the way I
  like it!

>> [_] Anonymous 11/21/11(Mon)12:11 No.

  The only smart hippy was the one in the white cap on the right who when the pepper spray came out
  was all like, "yeah, fuck this, have fun guys"

>> [_] Anonymous 11/21/11(Mon)12:19 No.

  Send him and e-mail to let him know he should keep up the good work.

>> [_] Anonymous 11/21/11(Mon)12:31 No.

  This didn't have to happen. Both are to blame.
  The police officer felt intimidated.

  This isn't as bad as the Andrew Meyer incident which was more obvious police brutality where
  three urban cops ganged up on one white dude.

>> [_] Anonymous 11/21/11(Mon)12:56 No.

  Sure is serious business in here.

>> [_] Anonymous 11/21/11(Mon)13:12 No.

  Oh look, a thread full of political strawmen, how unusual. Maybe one day we will be able to
  discuss a subject of legality without it immediately devolving into taking pot-shots at each
  individuals opposing political group. Shame this sentiment seems to carry over to actual high-end
  politics too, where it is more about undercutting "the enemy" than it is about making good
  decisions.

>> [_] Anonymous 11/21/11(Mon)13:14 No.

  >>1578829
  Not the newfag4chan.

>> [_] Anonymous 11/21/11(Mon)13:40 No.

  If you ask me, this is how a real protest should go down. No violence, no one getting seriously
  hurt, just the protesters blocking the path.

  And judging by the actions of some pissed off Police, it shows that its working. But come on
  guys, do you seriously think there wouldn't have be any repercussions on taking this kind of
  action?

  Grow the fuck up.

>> [_] Anonymous 11/21/11(Mon)14:34 No.

  i hate everyone that uses the word "troll". you are destroying discussion online. as soon as you
  read something dumb or if someone is disagreeing with you you assume he is "trolling". as soon as
  someone points out a big flaw in your/someones argument you just say that he was trolled. "i
  trolled you" lol. grow up and please assume that whatever you read is serious. more fun that way.
  or at least stop using the word "troll", its ugly and childish.

>> [_] Anonymous 11/21/11(Mon)14:46 No.

  >112 replies
  the fuck?

>> [_] Anonymous 11/21/11(Mon)15:17 No.

  113.