File[jellyfish & loli.swf] - (254 KB)
[_] [H] tentacle+loli Mugen7676 !z3WlfboQ5U 03/25/12(Sun)20:55 No.1643126
dat feel when you realize its not a troll
Marked for deletion (old).
>> [_] sage sage 03/25/12(Sun)20:56 No.1643127
dat feel when you realize she's under age and can't fap to it because you're not a pedophile
>> [_] Mugen7676 !z3WlfboQ5U 03/25/12(Sun)21:06 No.1643137
ಠ_ಠ
>>1643127
>>1643127
>implying sage is taken serious on 4chan
sage does nothing except not let you bump the thread. doesnt bump down the thread, faggot.
>> [_] Anonymous 03/25/12(Sun)21:07 No.1643139
>>1643137
That's something to me
>> [_] Anonymous 03/25/12(Sun)21:08 No.1643141
>>1643127
>normalfags
>4chan
You don't belong here, faggot.
>> [_] Anonymous 03/25/12(Sun)21:56 No.1643166
Holy shit this is old. I remember this from so dam long ago, when I first got into tentacles
>> [_] SAGE SAGE 03/25/12(Sun)22:58 No.1643202
>>1643137
Implying SAGE has no relevance on 4chan.
GTFO, newfag.
>> [_] Anonymous 03/26/12(Mon)01:18 No.1643262
>>1643127
>>1643137
>>1643139
>>1643202
Implying any of you actually know what the fuck you're talking about, and aren't just dick-waving
for the sake of dick-waving.
>> [_] Anonymous 03/26/12(Mon)01:35 No.1643269
>IMPLYING
>IMPLYING
>IMPLYING
>IMPLYING
>IMPLYING
>IMPLYING
>> [_] Anonymous 03/26/12(Mon)01:37 No.1643271
>>1643137
From da rules
"What is "sage"?
Entering "sage" (by itself) into the [E-mail] field while replying will cause the thread not to
bump to the top of the page, while still counting against its reply count. Threads that reach
their reply limit can no longer be bumped, causing them to sink to the back pages and be pruned
more quickly. Abusing the sage function by "sage-bombing" is frowned upon and may result in a
ban." And now you know, and knowing is half the battle
>> [_] Anonymous 03/26/12(Mon)01:57 No.1643280
>>1643271
>Implying threads on /f/ ever come close to the post limit
>> [_] Anonymous 03/26/12(Mon)02:01 No.1643282
>>1643280
*Face Palm* I wasn't "Implying" that at all, I was just quoting the FAQ because it seemed like he
did not know. Context is key
>> [_] Anonymous 03/26/12(Mon)02:09 No.1643283
>>1643282
So you enjoy flexing your futile bitching muscle? In laymen's terms, your vagina?
>> [_] Anonymous 03/26/12(Mon)02:13 No.1643285
>>1643283
What the fuck are you even saying? I was informing him that is all no more no less, you
apparently took it way out of context.
>> [_] Anonymous 03/26/12(Mon)03:49 No.1643321
>>1643126
dat feel when you realize the fucking sound is broken on this one.
The one I have on my HD works fine... what gives?
