File[atheist_delusion.swf] - (2.38 MB)
[_] [?] Anonymous 03/09/12(Fri)22:29 No.1634180
Proof.
Marked for deletion (old).
>> [_] Anonymous 03/09/12(Fri)23:01 No.1634199
Can't tell if trolling, or just stupid.
>> [_] Anonymous 03/09/12(Fri)23:03 No.1634202
>>1634199
You know what, next time i'll read the credits before saying anything...
>> [_] Anonymous 03/09/12(Fri)23:14 No.1634205
>God Wrote the bible
>God's a nigger
>Cant read or write
What now?
>> [_] Anonymous 03/09/12(Fri)23:18 No.1634207
Obvious troll.
If you need any proof, the Bible was written 300 years after Jesus' death by a collection of
monks, as they were some of the only people able to write.
As a side note, this fact is one of the strongest arguments against the realism of the bible, in
my opinion. You ever play that game telephone as a kid? Imagine playing it for 300 years, having
been passed on possibly over a million times.
>> [_] Anonymous 03/09/12(Fri)23:23 No.1634209
>>1634207
Except that's not true at all.
>> [_] Anonymous 03/09/12(Fri)23:29 No.1634215
>>1634207
>>1634209
(To elaborate, the Bible as a whole was written by many different people over hundreds of years.
However, if we're talking about the Gospels specifically, the earliest (Mark) is generally held
by scholars to have been written about 40 years after Jesus' death. At that time, there would
have still been eye witnesses alive to dispute fabrications.
>> [_] Anonymous 03/09/12(Fri)23:31 No.1634218
>>1634215
i dont think you understand how long people lived back then
>> [_] Anonymous 03/09/12(Fri)23:37 No.1634220
>>1634218
Life expectancy wasn't great, but not everyone was dropping dead before they hit 20, either. And
it doesn't take many to call bullshit and debunk the whole thing.
At any rate, it's not at all comparable to million-man telephone. You'd still have at the very
least hundreds of second-hand accounts.
>> [_] Anonymous 03/09/12(Fri)23:42 No.1634222
ITT: People who need to look up the word "satire".
>> [_] Anonymous 03/09/12(Fri)23:51 No.1634226
Even if there were very old people that followed jesus around his entire life to retell it to
various scholars, however unlikely that may be, it doesnt explain other factors.
Christianity as a whole is an amalgamation of other religions. It was slowly molded to be as
convenient and welcoming as possible to other more prevalent religions. Paganism was quite
popular, and their most celebrated holidays (Renamed Chirstmas and Easter eventually) were
adopted to bring in new people.
Also many of the key elements to Jesus' birth were adopted from the lore of Osiris.
>> [_] Anonymous 03/09/12(Fri)23:52 No.1634227
Yeah this guy is a troll he says so himself.
Look up Edward Current on Youtube.
>> [_] Anonymous 03/10/12(Sat)00:11 No.1634232
Checkmate!
>> [_] Anonymous 03/10/12(Sat)00:13 No.1634233
The origins of the bible(s) have nothing to do with the existence of god(s). Seriously guise.
Don't play their dumb game.
>> [_] Anonymous 03/10/12(Sat)00:14 No.1634234
This hurt my fucking brain. I think its broken. WTF...
>> [_] Anonymous 03/10/12(Sat)00:30 No.1634243
>>1634226
>Christianity ... people.
Well, no. Rather, Christians repurposed the pagan festivals for their own beliefs to make
Christianity more attractive to converts or potential converts. It's not a pagan festival; it's a
Christian festival that incorporates some pagan traditions that don't conflict with the Christian
beliefs. It's not like the festivals are core to the Christian beliefs; they're just largely
arbitrary days to celebrate.
>Also ... Osiris.
Rather than "adopted from" it's just as easily explained as "derived from the same source;" don't
forget that Judaic prophecy and tradition about the birth of the Messiah extends as far back as
the people themselves.
>> [_] Anonymous 03/10/12(Sat)00:36 No.1634247
>>1634243
>it's just as easily explained as "derived from the same source;"
Or "coincidence." Or "archetypical concept instilled into the human race by its creator to make
them more receptive to a message."
>> [_] Anonymous 03/10/12(Sat)00:44 No.1634252
Are kidding me?
/f/ has the most ignorant fuck on the internet.
This is not a troll. This guy is not serious.
Its a fucking joke and you are supposed to be smart enough to understand how stupid the points of
evidence he is using as a "christian". I a satire you fuckwads.
>> [_] Anonymous 03/10/12(Sat)00:58 No.1634260
hahahahah i posted this and you guys are killing me.
>> [_] Anonymous 03/10/12(Sat)01:11 No.1634265
>>1634252
God, thank you.
(no pun intended.)
I find it hilarious that "trolling" was brought up, but not just simple sarcasm.
Sad, really.
>> [_] Anonymous 03/10/12(Sat)01:15 No.1634268
ITT a religious debate that hasn't resulted in both parties calling each other faggots. I'm proud
of you guys. You managed to keep a simple argument simple without adding "umad" into the mix.
>> [_] Anonymous 03/10/12(Sat)01:43 No.1634277
silly christians
having an IQ lower than 50 is so august 4 1991
>> [_] Anonymous 03/10/12(Sat)02:35 No.1634297
>>1634220
>implying professional internet bloggers existed in Biblical times to debunk and challenge any
false narratives
>> [_] Anonymous 03/10/12(Sat)04:06 No.1634322
The butthurt in this thread, and not being able to spot a troll
Its delicious
>> [_] Anonymous 03/10/12(Sat)04:26 No.1634327
>god is a man
>god created/gave life to humans
>a guy created/gave life to humans
really? god isnt a female? i thought women give life to other humans, not men...
>> [_] Anonymous 03/10/12(Sat)04:36 No.1634329
>>1634327
>using science in a religious debate
oh you
>> [_] Anonymous 03/10/12(Sat)04:36 No.1634330
GOD IS A METAPHOR FOR TIME
>> [_] Anonymous 03/10/12(Sat)04:44 No.1634335
I am Christian. This is fucking bullshit. I'm calling trolling post.
